Skip to main content

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abu-Duhou, I. (1999). School-based management. Paris: Unesco/IIEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alternative Sud (1997). Editorial: Pouvoirs locaux. Alternative Sud, IV (3): 5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angus, J. (1994). Democratic Participation or Efficient Site Management: The School and Political Location of the Self-Managing School, (pp. 11–33). In J. Smyth (ed.). A Socially Critical View of the Self-Managing School. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnove, R. F. (1999). Reframing Comparative Education: The Dialectic of the Global and the Local. In R. F. Arnove, R. F. & C. A. Torres (eds). Comparative Education. The Dialectic of the Global and the Local, (pp. 1–24). Boulder: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnove, R., Franz, S., Mollis, M. and Torres, C. A. (1999). Education in Latin America at the End of the 1990s. In R. F. Arnove, R. F. & C. A. Torres (eds). Comparative Education. The Dialectic of the Global and the Local, (pp. 305–328). Boulder: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnstein, S. R. (1971). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the Royal Town Planning Institute. http://www.aiatsis.gov/au/rsrch/ntru/ifamp/pratice/pdfs/Arstein . Retrieved August 14, 2004.

  • Arsen, D. L., Plank, D. and Sykes, G. (2000). School Choice in Michigan: The Rules Matter. Lansing: Michigan State University;.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, S.M. (1996). How Countries Pay for Schools. An International Comparison of System for Financing Primary and Secondary Education. Paper prepared for the Center of the Consortium for Policy Research in Education (CPRE), University of Wisconsin;.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beare, H. (1993). Different Ways of Viewing School-site Councils: Whose Paradigm Is in the Use Here? In H. Beare and W.L. Boyd (eds.). Restructuring Schools. An International Perspective on the Movement to Transform the Control and Performance of School, (pp. 200–217). London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beare, H. and Boyd, W. L. (1993). Introduction. In H. Beare and W.L. Boyd (eds.). Restructuring Schools. An International Perspective on the Movement to Transform the Control and Performance of School, (pp. 3–11). London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J. (2000). Globalization: A Useful Concept for Feminists Rethinking Theory and Strategies in Education? In N. Burbules & C. A. Torres (eds.).Globalization and education. Critical Perspectives, (pp. 133–155). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boakari, M. F. (2004). Learning for Change: Lessons from Rural Community Participation. Paper presented at the annual conference organized by Comparative and International Education Society, March 9–12, in Salt Lake City, the USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolivia–Sida (2000). Popular Participation, Decentralization and Education in Bolivia. Paper presented at a seminar organized by the Swedish Development Cooperation Authority, October 13, 2000, in Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, M. (1997). Community Financing of Education: Rationales, Mechanisms, and Policy Implications in Less Developed Countries. In C. Colclough (ed.). Marketizing Education and Health in Developing Countries: Miracle or Mirage? , (pp. 185–201) Oxford: Clanderon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, M. (1998). Financing Education in Developing Asia: Patterns, Trends and Policy Implications. Hongkong: Asian Development Bank/The University of Hongkong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, J. B. (1993). Paradox and Uncertainty in the Governance of Education. In H. Beare and W.L. Boyd (eds.). Restructuring Schools. An International Perspective on the Movement to Transform the Control and Performance of School, (pp. 158–173). London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castillo, J. B. (2002).Descentralización del estado y articulación del espacio nacional. El Caso de la Región Sur del Ecuador. Third edition. Quito: Libre Mundi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Codd, J. A. (1994). Managerialism, Market Liberalism, and the Move to Self-Managing Schools in New Zealand. In J. Smyth (ed.). A Socially Critical View of the Self-Managing School, (pp. 153–170). London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, M. and Watson, K. (2003). Comparative and International Research in Education. Globalisation, context and difference. London & New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, R. (1997). The State and the Governance of Education: An Analysis of the Restructuring of the State-Education Relationship. In A. H. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown, and A. Stuart Wells (eds). Education. Culture, Economy, Society, (pp. 273–298). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, R. (1999). Specifying globalization effects on national policy: a focus on the mechanisms. Journal of Education Policy, 14 (1):1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale, R. (2000). Globalization and education: Demonstrating a “common world educational culture” or locating a “globally structured educational agenda”? Educational Theory, 40 (4): 427–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daresh, J. C. (1998). Professional development for school leadership: The impact of U. S. educational reform. International Journal of Educational Research, 29: 299–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daun, H. (2003). Market Forces and Decentralization in Sweden–a Threat to Comprehensiveness and Equity and an Impetus for School Development? In D. N. Plank & G. Sykes (eds.). Choosing Choice. School Choice in International Perspective, (pp. 92–111). New York and London: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daun, H. (2004). Privatization, Decentralization and Governance in Education in the Chech Republic, England, France. Germany and Sweden. International Review of Education, 50: 325–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daun, H. & R. Arjmand (forthc. 2006). Education in Europe and Muslim Demands for Competitive and Moral Education. International Review of Education, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daun, H. & Sapatoru, D. (2002). Educational Reforms in Eastern Europe: Shifts, Innovations and Restoration. In H. Daun (ed). Educational Restructuring in the Context of Globalization and Local Demands, (pp. 147–179). New York: Garland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daun, H., Slenning, K. & Waldow, F. (2004). Sweden. In E. Klieme (ed.). Educational Standards in Some OECD Countries, (pp. 115–145). Münster: Waxman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diallo, A. S. (2004). Community Participation in Education for Equity and Quality I. Paper presented at the annual conference organized by Comparative and International Education Society, March 9–12, in Salt Lake City, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durston, S. & Nashire, N. (1998). Community Participation in Education: Policies, Practices and Real Lives. Paper presented at the conference organized by the World Comparative Education Societies, in Cape Town, July 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmore, R.F. (1993). School Decentralization: Who Gains? Who Looses. In J. Hannawy and M. Carnoy (eds.). Decentralization and School Improvement. Can We Fulfill the Promise?, (pp. 33–54). San Fransisco: The Jossey-Bass Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esteva, G. and Prakash, M. S. (1998) Grassroots Postmodernism. Rewaking the Soil of Cultures, London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ethiopia-Sida (2001). Decentralisation in Education–Ethiopia Paper presented at a seminar organized by the Swedish Development Cooperation Authority, in Stockholm, October 13, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurydice (2003). http://www.eurydice.org/Eurybase/Applic . Retrieved November 15, 2003.

  • Fine (1993). (Ap) parent Involvement: Reflections on Parents, Power and Urban Public Schools. Teachers College Record, 94, reprinted in A. H. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown, and A. Stuart Wells (eds). Education. Culture, Economy, Society, (pp. 460–475). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, E. B. (1996). Decentralization of Education: Politics and Consensus. Washington: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske , E. B. & Ladd, H. F. (2003). School Choice in New Zealand: A Cautionary Tale. In D. N. Plank & G. Sykes (eds.).Choosing Choice. School Choice in International Perspective, (pp. 45–66). New York and London: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fofana, B. (2004). Community Participation in Education as a Catalyst for a Free Society, II. Paper presented at the annual conference organized by Comparative and International Education Society, March 9–12, in Salt Lake City, the USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnier , M. (2004). Community Participation in Education as a Catalyst for a Free Society, III. Paper presented at the annual conference organized by Comparative and International Education Society, March 9–12, in Salt Lake City, the USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaziel, H. (1998). School-Based Management as a Factor in School Effectiveness. International Review of Education, 44 (4): 319–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, N. (2004). Transformation of the Welfare State: The Silent Surrender of the Public Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace, G. (1997). Politics, Markets and Democratic Schools: On the Transformation of School Leadership. In A. H. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown, and A. Stuart Wells (eds). Education. Culture, Economy, Society (pp. 311–319). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, D. (1999). From supervision to quality assurance: the case of the State of Victoria (Australia). Paris: IIEP/Unesco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamidou, M. (1997). Décentrer ou decentraliser: un dilemme au Mali. Alternative Sud, IV, 3: 148–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, L. (2003). Assessment as a Policy tool. Review of Research in Education, 27: 25–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammouda, H. B. (1997). Vers une nouvelle problématique du savoir sur le développement. Alternative Sud, IV, 3: 25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannaway, J. (1993). Decentralization in Two School Districts: Challenging the Standard Paradigm. In J. Hannaway and M. Carnoy (eds.).Decentralization and School Improvement. Can We Fulfill the Promise?, (pp. 135–162). San Fransisco: The Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannaway, J. & Woodroffe, N. (2003). Policy Instruments in Education. Review of Research in Education, 27: 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, E.M. (1990). School-based Managemen and Educational Reform in he United Sates and Spain. Comparative Education Review, 34 (4): 523–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, E.M. (1995). Democratization and Decentralization in Colombian Education. Comparative Education Review, 39 (1): 101–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, E. M. (2001). Democratization and Educational Decentralization in Spain: A Twenty Year Struggle for Reform. Education Reform and Management Publication Series, 1 (3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harold, B. (1998). “Head”-ing into the future: The changing role of New Zealand´s principals. International Journal of Educational Research, 29: 299–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, J. N. (2000). Centralization, decentralization, recentralization. Educational reform in China. Journal of Educational Administration, 38, (5): 442–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henig, J.R. (1993). Rethinking School Choice. Limits of the Market Metaphor. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, C. & Lidström, A. (2001). National School Policy Changes in Britain and Sweden. In C. Hudson. & A. Lidström (eds.).Local Education Policies. Comparing Sweden and Britain, (pp. 27–64). Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO (1996). Impact of structural adjustment on the employment and training of teachers. Geneva: ILO, Sectoral Activities Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1997).Modernization and Postmodernization. Cultural, Economic and Political Changes in 43 Countries. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayal, N. G. & Pai, S. (2001). Introduction. In N. G. Jayal & S. Pai (eds.). Democratic Governance in India. Challenges of Poverty, Development and Identity, (pp. 11–31). New Delhi: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N (1987). The Welfare State in Transition. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanaev, A. and Daun, H. (2002). Nationalism and Educational Transition in Central Asia. In H. Daun (ed.).Educational Restructuring in the Context of Globalization and National Policy, (pp. 227–244). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmerer, F. (1994). Decentralization of Schooling in Developing Nations. In T. Husén & N. Postleithwaite (eds). International Encyclopedia of Education, (pp. 1412–1416). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitaev, I. (1999). Private education in sub-Saharan Africa: a re-examination of theories and concepts related to its development and finance. Paris: Unesco–International Institute for Educational Planning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, H. F. (2003). Introduction. In D. N. Plank & G. Sykes (eds.). Choosing Choice. School Choice in International Perspective (pp. 1–23). New York and London: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lareau, A. (1987). Social-Class Differences in Family-School Relationship: The Importance of Cultural Capital. Sociology of Education, 60: 73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leclercq, F. (2003). Decentralisation and Quality of Teaching: A Field Study of Primary Schools in Madhya Pradesh, India. Paper presented at the Paper presented at the conference organized by United Kingdom Forum for International Education and Training, in Oxford, England, September 9–12, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levacic, R. (1995). Local Management of Schools. Analysis and Practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, N. and L. Pereira (1992). Why States Change the Governance of Education: an historical comparison of Brazil and the United States. Comparative Education Review, 28 (2): 167–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, J. (1986). Community Participation: History, Concepts and Controversies. In J. Midgley (ed). Community Participation, Social Development and the State, (pp. 13–47). London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mmbaga, D. R. (2002). The Inclusive Classroom in Tanzania. Dream or Reality? Stockholm: Institute of International Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohannan, B. (1997). La décentralisation en Inde. Alternative Sud, IV (3): 61–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muta, H. (2000). Deregulation and decentralization of education in Japan. Journal of Educational Administration, 38 (5): 455–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo, J. (2005). Education Decentralization in Africa: Great Expectations and Unfulfilled Promises. In D. P. Baker & A. W. Wiseman (eds.). Global Trends in Educational Policy. Vol 6: International Perspectives on Education and Society, (pp. 99–124). New York: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. & Inglehart, R. (2004). Sacred and Secular. Religion and Politics Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odden, A. and P. Wohlstetter (1993). Strategies for Making School-Based Management Work. Consortium for Policy Research (CPRE), (pp. 6–10). New Brunswick.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1995a).Participatory Development and Good Governance. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1995b). Decision-making in 14 OECD Education Systems. Paris: OECD/CERI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornelas, C. (2000). The politics of the educational decentralization in Mexico. Journal of Educational Administration, 38 (5): 426–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ornelas, C. (2004). Decentralization in Mexico. Paper presented at the annual conference organized by Comparative and International Education Society, March 9–12, in Salt Lake City, the USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papagiannis, G.J., P.A. Easton & Owens, J. T. (1992). The School Restructuring Movement in the USA: an analysis of major issues and policy implications. Paris: Unesco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrinos, H. A. & Lakshmanan, A. (1997).Decentralization of Education, Demand-Side Financing. Washington: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, J. (2000). Introduction: Understanding Governance. In J. Pierre (ed.). Debating Governance, (pp. 1–12). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, S. & Whitty, G. (1997). Managing the State and the Market: ´New´ Education Management in Five Countries. British Journal of Educational Studies, 45 (4): 342–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, J. (2003). ´Community´ Participation in Rural Schooling: a case study from Ghana. Paper presented at the conference organized by United Kingdom Forum for International Education and Training, in Oxford, England, September 9–12, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimers, F. & Tiburcio, L. (1993). Education, Adjustment and Reconstruction: Options for Change. A Unesco Discussion Paper. Paris: Unesco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, K. och D. Rawles (1997). Inspection and School Improvement in England and Wales. In T. Townsend (ed.). Restructuring and Quality: Issues for Tomorrow´s Schools. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, J. M. (1998). From Managing in question to leadership perspectives. International Journal of Education Research, 29: 359–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rock Kane, P. and Lauricella, C. J. (2001). Assessing the Growth and Potential of Charter Schools. In H. M. Levin (ed.). Privatizing Education. Can Marketplace Deliver Choice, Efficiency, Equity and Social Cohesion? (pp. 203–233). Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz de Forsberg, N. (2003).School Community Voices: Implementation of the Autonomous School Program in Nicaragua. Stockholm: Institute of International Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samoff, J. (1999). Institutionalizing International Influence. In R. F. Arnove, R. F. & C. A. Torres (eds). Comparative Education. The Dialectic of the Global and the Local, (pp. 51–89). Boulder: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos Filho dos, C.J. (1993). The Recent Process of Decentralization and Democratic Management of Education in Brazil. International Review of Education, 39 (5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayed, Y. (2002). Democratising Education in a Decentralized System: South African Policy and Practice. Compare, 32 (1): 35–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, H. (1997). Participatory Governance: The Missing Link for Poverty Reduction. Policy Brief No. 17. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaeffer, S. (1994). Participation for Educational Change: A Synthesis of Experience. UNESCO. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddique, N. A. (1997). Théories de la d´centralisation de l´État. Alternative Sud, IV (3): 23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolverket (1999). Nationella kvalitetsgranskningen 1998. (The National Quality Assessment 1998). Stockholm: National Agency for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolverket (2000). Nationella kvalitetsgranskningen 2000. (The National Quality Assessment 2000) Stockholm: The National Agency for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolverket (2001a). Fem år av försöksverksamhet med lokala styrelser med föräldramajoritet. (Five years of experimentation with local boards with parental majority). Dnr 2000:615. Stockholm: National Agency for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolverket (2001b). Attityder till skolan 2000. (Attitudes towards school). Stockholm: The National Agency for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolverket (2003). SIRIS, SALSA: http://salsa.artisan.se . Retrieved November 15, 2003.

  • Slater, R.O. (1993). On centralization, decentralization and school restructuring: A sociological perspective. In H. Beare and W.L. Boyd (eds.). Restructuring Schools. An International Perspective on the Movement to Transform the Control and Performance of School, (pp. 174–183). London: The Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southworth, G. (1998). Change and continuity in the work of primary headteachers in England. International Journal of Educational Research, 29: 311–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tikly, L. (1998). Redefining Community Involvement in the Finance and Governance of Education in Developing Countries: A New Role for Local Governance. Paper presented at the conference organized by the World Comparative Education Societies, July 12–17, in Cape Town, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsang, M. D. (2003). School Choice in the People´s Republic of China. In D. N. Plank & G. Sykes (eds.).Choosing Choice. School Choice in International Perspective, (pp. 164–195). New York and London: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vynnycky, C. (2004). Obligatorisk grunnskoleopplaering i Sverige, utenor skolen och hjemmmebasert–tegn på forandring? (Compulsory basic education in Sweden, outside the school or home-based–signs of change). In C. Beck & M. Straume (eds.).Hjemmeundervisning–starten på en ny utdanningsrevolusjon? (pp. 67–92). Vallset: Oplandske Bokforlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, H. N. (1993). Control Versus Legitimation: The Politics of Ambivalence. In J. Hannaway and M. Carnoy (eds.).Decentralization and School Improvement. Can We Fulfill the Promise?, (pp. 55–83). San Fransisco: The Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weindling, D. (1998). Reform, restructuring, role and other “R” words: The effects of headteachers in England and Wales. International Journal of Educational Research, 29: 299–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, A. S. and Scott, J. (2001). Privatization and Charter School Reform: Ecnomic, Political and Soäcial Dimensions. In H. M. Levin (ed.). Privatizing Education. Can Marketplace Deliver Choice, Efficiency, Equity and Social Cohesion? (pp. 234–259). Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, T. & McGinn, N. F. (1999). Decentralization of education: why, when, what and how? Paris: IIEP/Unesco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitty, G. (1996). Creating Quasi-Markets in Education: A Review of Recent Research on Parental Choice and School Autonomy in Three Countries. Oxford Studies in Comparative Education, 8 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitty, G. (1997). Marketization, the State and the Re-formation of the Teaching Profession. In A. H. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown, and A. Stuart Wells (eds). Education. Culture, Economy, Society (pp. 299–310). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieringen, F. van (1997). School Autonomy: A Framework for European Comparison. In S. Lawton, R. Read & F. Wieringen (eds.).Restructuring Public Schooling: Europe, Canada, America, (pp. 59–74). New York: Waxman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R.A. (1997). Human Rights, Culture and Context: An Introduction. In R. A. Wilson (ed.). Human Rights, Culture and Context. Anthropological Perspectives, (pp. 1–27). London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, D.R. (1993). Fiscal Decentralization and Accountability in Education: Experiences in Four Countries. In J. Hannaway and M. Carnoy (eds.).Decentralization and School Improvement. Can We Fulfill the Promise? (pp. 102–134). San Fransisco: The Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, C. (1995). School-site Management–Some Lessons from New Zealand. Paper given at the annual AERA meeting, San Fransico, United States, 18–21 April, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhenyao, W. (1997). L´autonomie villageoise en Chine: état présent et prospective. Alternative Sud, IV, 3: 102–134.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Holger Daun

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Daun, H. (2007). How Does Educational Decentralization Work and What Has it Achieved?. In: Daun, H. (eds) School Decentralization in the Context of Globalizing Governance. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4700-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics