Skip to main content

DECENTRALIZATION AND DEVOLUTION IN PAKISTAN: EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE PRAETORIAN INTERPRETATION

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Educational Decentralization

Abstract

Pakistan has a diverse ethnic population of 142 million people, with 32.2% living below the poverty line (I-PRSP, 2001). It is a federation with four provinces and four federally administered territories.1 For three decades the country experienced a process of increasing centralization in decision-making, resource management, and service delivery. During that period, governments were set-up under Islamic Socialism, martial law, experiments with democracy by eight governments, and another military take over. Democratic institutions and service delivery eroded at each reconstruction of the state. To offset poor governance, a process of devolution has been initiated through the establishment of local governments across Pakistan. The principle of inclusion through political decentralization was meant to provide institutional entitlements for voice and action. Direct elections were held at the union council level (encompassing a population of 25,000, covering 5–7 villages or more settlements) in 2000 for 21 representatives. As the result of a countrywide mobilization drive, 33% seats were reserved for women, an unprecedented accomplishment in Pakistan’s history. In addition, six seats were set-aside for workers and peasants and one for a representative of a minority group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Bashir, S., & Viadyanatha A. R. V. (2001). District primary education programme. Submitted to the Encyclopaedia of Indian Education, NCERT, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, M. (1994). Centralization/decentralization and privatization/publicization: Conceptual issues and the need for more research. International Journal of Education Research, 21(8), 817–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray, M. (1996a). Privatisation of secondary education: Issues and policy implications. International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century, UNESCO, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, M. (1996b). Decentralization of education: Community financing. World Bank, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, N. (2002). Pakistan: Working with the private sector in primary and middle school education, towards a policy framework (DRAFT). The World Bank, SASHID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Bureau of Statistics. (2001). Census of Private Educational Institutions in Pakistan 1000–2000. Islamabad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, E. B. (1996). Decentralization of education: Politics and consensus. Directions in Development, The World Bank, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazdar, H. (1999). Universal basic education in Pakistan: A commentary on strategy and results of a survey. SDPI Working Papers, Islamabad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Pakistan. (2000). Local government plan 2000. National Reconstruction Bureau, Islamabad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Pakistan. (2001). Finance division—Interim poverty reduction strategy paper (I-PRSP), Islamabad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Pakistan. (2002). Planning division—Poverty reduction and human development. Strategy for Pakistan Human Development Forum, Islamabad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of the Punjab. (2000). Devolving the state: A model for empowering the people. Task Force on Social Empowerment, Lahore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, E. M. (2000). Democratization and education decentralization in Spain: A twenty year struggle for reform. Country Studies, Education Reform and Management Publication Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idara-e-Taleem-o-Aagahi. (2001). Policy note to the district, provincial and federal education and NRB authorities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamil, B. (1999). Privatization and equity: The case of Pakistani urban secondary schools, Unpublished Mphil/PhD thesis, University of London, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kardar, S. (1996). Survey of schools in five districts of Punjab. British Council: Systems Private Limited, Lahore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, S. et al. (1999). The state of basic education in Pakistan: A qualitative, comparative institutional analysis. Islamabad, Sustainable Development Policy Institute, Working Papers Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauglo, J. & McLean, M. (1985). The control of education: International perspectives on the centralization-decentralization debate. Heineman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (1998). National education policy 1998–2010. Government of Pakistan, Islamabad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2002). Education sector reforms action plan 2001—2005. Government of Pakistan, Islamabad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Multi-Donor Support Unit (MSU). (2001a). Elementary education in Pakistan: Current status, issues and future strategies. MSU, Islamabad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Multi-Donor Support Unit (MSU). (2001b). Report of the technical group meeting on devolution and decentralization: Implications for the education sector (February 26–27, 2001). Islamabad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Najam, M. J. (2001). Up-gradation of schools through community public partnerships—CPP (afternoon school system). Education Department, Government of Punjab, Punjab.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rondinelli, D. (1990). Decentralizing urban development programs: A framework for analyzing policy. U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqui, T. A. (2001). Towards good governance. Oxford University Press, Karachi.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Punjab Local Government Ordinance. (2001). Irfan Law Book House, Lahore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verghese, N. V. (1996). Decentralization of educational planning in India: The case of the district primary education programme. International Journal of Education Development, 16(4), 355–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodhall, M. (1997). Public versus private education: Changing perceptions of boundaries and roles. The World Bank, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jamil, B.R. (2006). DECENTRALIZATION AND DEVOLUTION IN PAKISTAN: EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE PRAETORIAN INTERPRETATION. In: BJORK, C. (eds) Educational Decentralization. Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4358-1_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics