Abstract
Pakistan has a diverse ethnic population of 142 million people, with 32.2% living below the poverty line (I-PRSP, 2001). It is a federation with four provinces and four federally administered territories.1 For three decades the country experienced a process of increasing centralization in decision-making, resource management, and service delivery. During that period, governments were set-up under Islamic Socialism, martial law, experiments with democracy by eight governments, and another military take over. Democratic institutions and service delivery eroded at each reconstruction of the state. To offset poor governance, a process of devolution has been initiated through the establishment of local governments across Pakistan. The principle of inclusion through political decentralization was meant to provide institutional entitlements for voice and action. Direct elections were held at the union council level (encompassing a population of 25,000, covering 5–7 villages or more settlements) in 2000 for 21 representatives. As the result of a countrywide mobilization drive, 33% seats were reserved for women, an unprecedented accomplishment in Pakistan’s history. In addition, six seats were set-aside for workers and peasants and one for a representative of a minority group.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
REFERENCES
Bashir, S., & Viadyanatha A. R. V. (2001). District primary education programme. Submitted to the Encyclopaedia of Indian Education, NCERT, New Delhi.
Bray, M. (1994). Centralization/decentralization and privatization/publicization: Conceptual issues and the need for more research. International Journal of Education Research, 21(8), 817–824.
Bray, M. (1996a). Privatisation of secondary education: Issues and policy implications. International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century, UNESCO, Paris.
Bray, M. (1996b). Decentralization of education: Community financing. World Bank, Washington, DC.
Burnett, N. (2002). Pakistan: Working with the private sector in primary and middle school education, towards a policy framework (DRAFT). The World Bank, SASHID.
Federal Bureau of Statistics. (2001). Census of Private Educational Institutions in Pakistan 1000–2000. Islamabad.
Fiske, E. B. (1996). Decentralization of education: Politics and consensus. Directions in Development, The World Bank, Washington, DC.
Gazdar, H. (1999). Universal basic education in Pakistan: A commentary on strategy and results of a survey. SDPI Working Papers, Islamabad.
Government of Pakistan. (2000). Local government plan 2000. National Reconstruction Bureau, Islamabad.
Government of Pakistan. (2001). Finance division—Interim poverty reduction strategy paper (I-PRSP), Islamabad.
Government of Pakistan. (2002). Planning division—Poverty reduction and human development. Strategy for Pakistan Human Development Forum, Islamabad.
Government of the Punjab. (2000). Devolving the state: A model for empowering the people. Task Force on Social Empowerment, Lahore.
Hanson, E. M. (2000). Democratization and education decentralization in Spain: A twenty year struggle for reform. Country Studies, Education Reform and Management Publication Series.
Idara-e-Taleem-o-Aagahi. (2001). Policy note to the district, provincial and federal education and NRB authorities.
Jamil, B. (1999). Privatization and equity: The case of Pakistani urban secondary schools, Unpublished Mphil/PhD thesis, University of London, London.
Kardar, S. (1996). Survey of schools in five districts of Punjab. British Council: Systems Private Limited, Lahore.
Khan, S. et al. (1999). The state of basic education in Pakistan: A qualitative, comparative institutional analysis. Islamabad, Sustainable Development Policy Institute, Working Papers Series.
Lauglo, J. & McLean, M. (1985). The control of education: International perspectives on the centralization-decentralization debate. Heineman, London.
Ministry of Education. (1998). National education policy 1998–2010. Government of Pakistan, Islamabad.
Ministry of Education. (2002). Education sector reforms action plan 2001—2005. Government of Pakistan, Islamabad.
Multi-Donor Support Unit (MSU). (2001a). Elementary education in Pakistan: Current status, issues and future strategies. MSU, Islamabad.
Multi-Donor Support Unit (MSU). (2001b). Report of the technical group meeting on devolution and decentralization: Implications for the education sector (February 26–27, 2001). Islamabad.
Najam, M. J. (2001). Up-gradation of schools through community public partnerships—CPP (afternoon school system). Education Department, Government of Punjab, Punjab.
Rondinelli, D. (1990). Decentralizing urban development programs: A framework for analyzing policy. U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, DC.
Siddiqui, T. A. (2001). Towards good governance. Oxford University Press, Karachi.
The Punjab Local Government Ordinance. (2001). Irfan Law Book House, Lahore.
Verghese, N. V. (1996). Decentralization of educational planning in India: The case of the district primary education programme. International Journal of Education Development, 16(4), 355–365.
Woodhall, M. (1997). Public versus private education: Changing perceptions of boundaries and roles. The World Bank, Washington, DC.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jamil, B.R. (2006). DECENTRALIZATION AND DEVOLUTION IN PAKISTAN: EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE PRAETORIAN INTERPRETATION. In: BJORK, C. (eds) Educational Decentralization. Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4358-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4358-1_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-4356-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4358-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)