Skip to main content

DECENTRALIZATION OF EDUCATIONAL GOVERNANCE IN INDIA: TRENDS AND ISSUES

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Educational Decentralization

Abstract

In recent years, decentralization has become a global trend and it is on the political agenda in many countries. Education is being decentralized in numerous countries as part of a larger move to reform public management systems (Govinda, 2003a). The policies largely aim to reduce government size, reorganize delivery, expand private initiatives, and create new partnerships. Decentralization is having a significant impact on policy, planning, and management of elementary education. With the increasing impact of globalization, the challenges faced by the nations of the world are substantial; hence, the importance of localization through decentralization has intensified. At the same time, decentralization is seen as a means of improving the efficiency of education systems and the quality of educational services. In India, education is the joint responsibility of state and union governments. Ever since decentralization has been promoted in the field of education, different states in India have undergone various decentralization processes with distinct outcomes. The actual manifestation of the process of decentralization, in terms of the rationale put forth as well as operational features adopted, varies widely across the states. The socio-political context and the degree of popular participation in the decision-making process directly influence the outcomes of decentralization measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Adamolekun, L., Robert, R., & Laleye, M., (1990). Decentralisation policies and socio-economic development in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: Economic Development Institute of the World Bank and Pan African Institute for Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan, P. (2001). Social justice in the global economy. Economic and Political Weekly Special Articles (February 3–10), 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. S., Dyckman, J. W., Schoenberger, E., & Downs, C. R. (1981). Decentralization: A framework for policy analysis (pp. 46–48). Berkeley: Institute for International Studies, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook, R., & Manor, J. (2000). Democratic decentralization, operations evaluation department. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delors, J. (1996). Education: The necessary utopia. In Learning: The treasure within (pp. 13–35). Paris: Report of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century, UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhar, T. N. (1997). Decentralized management of elementary education: The Indian experience. In R. Govinda (Ed.), Decentralization of Educational Management: Experiences from South Asia (pp. 95–121). Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faguet, J. P. (2001). Does decentralization increase responsiveness to local needs? Evidence from Bolivia. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govinda, R. (1997). Decentralized management of primary education in South Asia: Policy and Practice. In R. Govinda (Ed.), Decentralization of Educational Management: Experiences from South Asia (pp. 15–72). Paris: UNESCO International Institute of Educational Planning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govinda, R. (2001). Capacity building for educational governance at local levels. Paper presented at the International Consultation on Educational Governance at Local Levels, held at UNESCO, Paris, 27–28 February 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govinda, R. (2003a). Decentralising education: Trends and issues. IIEP Newsletter, XXI(2), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govinda, R. (2003b). Dynamics of decentralized management and community empowerment in primary education: A comparative analysis of policy and practice in Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh. In R. Govinda & R. Diwan (Eds.), Community participation and empowerment in primary education: Indian experience. New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govinda, R., & Varghese, N. V. (1994). District level plan implementation strategy with particular reference to school improvement. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantha, V. K., & Narain, D. (2003). Dynamics of community mobilization in a fragmented and turbulent state. In R. Govinda & R. Diwan (Eds.), Community participation and empowerment in primary education. New Delhi: Sage Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauglo, J., & McClean, M. (1985). The control of education: International perspectives on the centralization–decentralization debate. London: Heinamann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclure, R. (1993). School reform in Burkina Faso: The limited prospects of decentralization and local participation. Canadian and International Education, 22(2), 69–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathur, K. (1985). Small farmers development agency in India: An experiment in controlled decentralization. In G. Shabbir Cheema (Ed.), Rural Development in Asia. New Delhi: Sterling Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, A. (1978). Report of the Committee of Panchayati Raj Institutions. New Delhi: Department of Rural Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Human Resource Development. (1995). Report of the CABE Committee on decentralization in education. New Delhi: Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal, G. (1968). Asian drama: An inquiry into the poverty of nations. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCERT. (1972). Report of the Education Commission 1964–66 (p. 12). New Delhi: NCERT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, D. (1989). Territorial power and the peripheral state: The issue of decentralization. Development and Change, 20(3), 501–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, N. (1992). Panchayati raj in West Bengal: Popular participation for the people or the party? Development and Change, 23(4), 129–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, H. N. (1983). Legalization, expertise, and participation: Strategies of compensatory legitimation in educational policy. Comparative Education Review, 27(2): 259–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2000). Hidden challenges to education systems in transition economies: A world free of poverty. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Govinda, R., Bandyopadhyay, M. (2006). DECENTRALIZATION OF EDUCATIONAL GOVERNANCE IN INDIA: TRENDS AND ISSUES. In: BJORK, C. (eds) Educational Decentralization. Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4358-1_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics