Abstract
There are some differences in the way we use the terms ‘value’ and ‘good’. The most obvious difference is that ‘value’ is used exclusively as a noun, for which the corresponding adjective is ‘valuable’; while ‘good’ is used primarily as an adjective. However ‘valuable’ does not mean quite the same thing as ‘good’. ‘Valuable’ suggests ‘good to possess’, or ‘good to use’; while ‘good’ cannot similarly be analyzed in terms of ‘valuable’. We would call some things ‘valuable’ — diamonds, water, popularity — which we should hesitate to call ‘good’. And we would call some things ‘good’ — an act of courage, a right choice, or an experience of pleasure — which we should hesitate to call ‘valuable’. There are other things which we would speak of in both ways, as both valuable and good — for example, friendship, truth, health. But these are things which are good to possess. We do not speak of a ‘valuable pleasure’ or a ‘valuable act of courage’, for we cannot strictly possess these but can only experience the pleasure and perform the act of courage. We would speak of a ‘good pleasure’ and a ‘good act of courage’, and we would speak of a ‘valuable habit of courage’ or a ‘valuable life’ for we could have or possess these latter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 1962 Sidney Zink
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zink, S. (1962). Value. In: The Concepts of Ethics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-81652-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-81652-1_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-81654-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-81652-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)