Skip to main content

Political Power and Territorial Form: the Nation in State Theory

  • Chapter
Nationalisms Old and New

Part of the book series: Explorations in Sociology ((EIS))

Abstract

The dominance of the nation state as overarching power and taken-for-granted societal unit has been thrown into doubt since the 1960s by transnational economic integration. However, this process is not as clear-cut as has sometimes been suggested, and is by no means following a single path or producing uniform results across territories. In Britain, for instance, European integration is more highly contested than elsewhere, and regional devolution has in the first instance been restricted to the old nations of Scotland and Wales. Elsewhere in the EU, regional states may be gaining in autonomy but this takes place at the price of greater fiscal isolation, while territories in central and eastern Europe have demonstrated renewed commitment to nationalism following the collapse of the supranational Soviet Union.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Althusser, L. (1977) For Marx (London: New Left Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Althusser, L. and Balibar, E. (1977) Reading Capital (London: New Left Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Altvater, E. (1978) ‘Some problems of state interventionism’, in Holloway, J. and Picciotto, S., State and Capital: A Marxist Debate (London: Edward Arnold).

    Google Scholar 

  • Altvater, E. and Kellscheuer, O. (1979) ‘Socialist politics and the “Crisis of Marxism”’, in Miliband, R. and Saville, J. (eds), Socialist Register (London: Merlin Press), pp. 101–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baran, P. A. (1973) The Political Economy of Growth (Harmonds-worth: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, C. (1978) ‘A note on the theory of the capitalist state’, Capital and Class, 4: 118–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanke, B., Jurgens, U. and Kastendiek, H. (1978) ‘On the current Marxist discussion on the analysis of form and function of the bourgeois state’, in Holloway, J. and Picciotto, S. (eds), State and Capital: A Marxist Debate (London: Edward Arnold).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, C. (1978) The Local State (London: Pluto Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, D. and Leitner, H. (1997) ‘The political construction of scale’, Political Geography, 16(2): 7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, S. S. and Goodwin, M. (1982) ‘The local state and restructuring social relations’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 6(2): 7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoare, Q. and Nowell-Smith, G. N. (eds) (1971) Selections From the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci (London: Lawrence & Wishart).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, J. and Picciotto, S. (eds) (1978) State and Capital: A Marxist Debate (London: Edward Arnold).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (1982) The Capitalist State: Marxist Theories and Methods (Oxford: Martin Robertson).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (1983) ‘Accumulation strategies, state forms and hegemonic projects’, Kapitalistate, 10/11: 89–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (1990) ‘Regulation theories in retrospect and prospect’, Economy and Society, 19: 153–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (1994) ‘The transition to post-Fordism and the Schumpeterian workfare state’, in Burrows R. and Loader, B. (eds), Towards a Post-Fordist Welfare State (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandel, E. (1970) Europe versus America? Contradictions of Imperialism (London: New Left Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, W. and Neussüs, C. (1975) ‘The social state illusion and the contradiction between wage labour and capital’, Telos, 25: 13–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, R. (1971) ‘The internationalisation of capital and the nation state’, New Left Review, 67: 84–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nairn, T. (1977) The Break-up of Britain (London: New Left Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Painter, J. and Goodwin, M. (1995) ‘Local governance and concrete research: investigating the uneven development of regulation’, Economy and Society, 24(3): 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulantzas, N. (1973) Political Power and Social Classes (London: New Left Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulantzas, N. (1975) Classes in Contemporary Capitalism (London: New Left Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowthorn, B. (1971) ‘Imperialism in the seventies — unity or rivalry’, New Left Review, 69: 31–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tickell, A. and Peck, J. (1992) ‘Accumulation, regulation and the geographies of post-Fordism: missing links in regulationist research’, Progress in Human Geography, 16(2): 7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, B. (1971) ‘The internationalisation of capital and the nation state: a comment’, New Left Review, 68: 83–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1999 British Sociological Association

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Collinge, C. (1999). Political Power and Territorial Form: the Nation in State Theory. In: Brehony, K.J., Rassool, N. (eds) Nationalisms Old and New. Explorations in Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27627-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics