Skip to main content

The Economics of Business Process Design: Motivation, Information and Coordination within the Firm

  • Chapter
International Business

Abstract

This chapter presents a transaction cost analysis of the internal business processes of firms. Business processes are collections of activities which are technologically or managerially linked so that they jointly affect value added. Their organisation is characterised by their ‘architecture’ - the allocation of responsibilities amongst individuals and groups and communication between them for information and coordination - and their incentive structure. The overall costs of organisation are determined by losses due to imperfect motivation of process members, which flows from the incentive structure, and imperfect information and coordination, which flow from the architecture, together with the resource costs associated with incentives and architecture. Perfect motivation corresponds to ‘team behaviour’ and a quantitative model, based on team theory, indicates how the best architecture depends on the degree interaction between activities comprising the business process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alchian, Annen and Demsetz, H. (1972) ‘Production, Information Costs and Economic Organisation’, American Economic Review, 62, 777-95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, M. (1986) ‘Horizontal vs. Vertical Information Structure of the Firm’, American Economic Review, 76, pp. 971-83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, Peter J. (1983) ‘New Theories of International Business: Some Unresolved Issues’, in Mark Casson (ed.), The Growth of International Business. London: Geor e Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, PeterJ.l1988) ‘The Limits of Explanation: Testing the Internalisation Theory of the Multinational Enterprise’, journal of International Business Studies, 19, 181-93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, Peter J. (1990) ‘Problems and Developments in the Core Theory of International Business’,joumal of International Business Studies, 21, 657-65. Buckley, Peter J. and Casson, Mark (1976) The Future of the Multinational Enterprise. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, Peter J. and Casson, Mark (1985) The Economic Theory of the Multinational Enterprise. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, Peter J. and Casson, Mark (1988) ‘A Theory of Cooperation in International Business’, in Farok,J. Contractor and Peter Lorange (eds), Cooperative Strategy in International Business. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, Peter J. and Glaister, Keith (1994) ‘UK International Joint Ventures: An Analysis of Patterns of Activity and Distribution’, British journal of Management, 5, 33-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, Martin, J. (1995) ‘Information and the Division of Labour: Implications for the Firm’s Choice of Organisation’, Economicjouma 105, 385-97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, Martin, J. (1996) ‘Is the Customer Always Right: Information, Qulality and Organisational Architecture’, University of Bradford Working Paper Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson, Mark (1981) ‘Foreword’ to Alan M. Rugman, Inside the Multinationals. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson, Mark (1990a) Enterprise and Competitiveness: A Systems View of International Business. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson, Mark (1990b) ‘Enterpreneurial Culture as a Competitive Advantage’, in Research in Global Management, 1, 139-51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson, Mark (1994) ‘Why are Firms Hierarchical?’, International]ournal of the Economics of Business, 1, 47-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald, H. (1937) ‘The Nature of the Firm’, Economica, 4, 386-405. Deming, W. Edwards, (1986) Out of the Crisis: Qgality, Productivity and Competitive Position. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, Peter F. (1988) ‘The Coming of the New Organisation’, Harvard Business Review, January-February, 45-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigenbaum, A. V. (1983) Total Qyality Contro 3rd edn, New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geanakoplos,J. and Milgrom, P. (1991) ‘A Theory of Hierarchies Based on Limited Managerial Attention’ ,journal ofjapanese and International Economies, 28,205-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, Michael and Champy,James (1993) Eengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution. London: Nicholas Brealey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heal, Geoffrey, M. (1973) The Theory of Economic Planning. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, Jean-Francrois (1986) ‘What is Intemalisation?’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 122, 791-804.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, Jean-Francrois (1988) ‘A Transaction Cost Theory of Equity Joint Ventures’, Strategic Managementjourna 9, 361-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, Jack (1956) ‘On the Economics of Transfer Pricing’, journal of Business, 29, 172-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, John (1993) Foundations of Corporate Success. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marscha.k,Jacob and Radner, Roy (1972) Economic Theory of Teams. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakland, John, S. (1993) Total Qyality Management: The Route to Improving Performance, 2nd edn. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, William, G. (1980) ‘Markets, Bureaucracies and Clans’, Administrative Science Qyarterly, 25, 120-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkhe, Arvind (1993) ‘“Messy” Research, Methodological Predispositions and Theory Development in International Joint Ventures’, Academy of Management Review, 18, 227-Q8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascale, Richard, T. and Athos, Anthony, G. (1981) The Art ofjapanese Management. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, Tom,J. and Waterman, Robert, H. (1982) In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America’s Best Run Companies. London: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radner, Roy (1992) ‘Hierarchy: the Economics of Managing’, journal of Economic Literature, 30, 1382-1415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sah, R. J. and Stiglitz, J. E. (1986) ‘The Architecture of Economic Systems: Hierarchies and Polyarchies’, American Economic Review, 76, 716-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sah, R.J. and Stiglitz,]. E. (1988) ‘Committees, Hierarchies and Polyarchies’, Economic]ourna4 98, 451-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Steve and Wright, Mike (1993) ‘Markets, Hierarchies and Markets Again’, in Christos Pitelis (ed.), Transaction Costs, Markets and Hierarchies. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Oliver, E. (1975) Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Anti-Trust Implications. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Oliver, E. (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1998 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Buckley, P.J., Carter, M.J. (1998). The Economics of Business Process Design: Motivation, Information and Coordination within the Firm. In: International Business. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26416-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics