Skip to main content

The measurement of psychological characteristics

  • Chapter
Psychology for Occupational Therapists

Part of the book series: Psychology for Professional Groups

  • 23 Accesses

Abstract

It is not totally unknown for an occupational therapist to feel the need to assess, say, memory in a patient and to ‘make up’ a test. A case in point would be when a number of items are presented to a patient on a tray for a few moments; the tray is then taken away, and the patient is asked to name as many items as possible. This is not a valid procedure. Such ‘tests’ should never be used unless the aim is solely to obtain a very general notion of what the person can do at that point in time. To be a proper test you need to know, for example, what scores people of a comparable age, intelligence and culture would obtain; and whether you are actually measuring a person’s memory and not anxiety or something else. You also need to know if the same individual would get the same score on two separate occasions. You will also have to ensure that the items are shown for precisely the same amount of time, and that the people are given precisely the same instructions and so on. The standardization of a test, and demonstrations of its reliability and validity, are complex and time-consuming matters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aliport, G.W. (1937) Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Mas, F.M. (1955) Science and the single case. Psychological Reports, 1, 65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fransella, F. (1981) Repertory grid technique. In F. Fransella (ed.), Personality: Theory, measurement and research. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fransella, F. and Bannister, D. (1977) Manual for Repertory Grid Technique. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G.A. (1955) The Psychology of Personal Constructs, Volumes I and II. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tryon, R.C. (1934) Individual differences. In F.A. Moss (ed.), Comparative Psychology. New York: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Annotated reading

  • Semeonoff, B. (1976) Projective Techniques. Chichester: Wiley. This is a comprehensive account of projective techniques and should be referred to if you wish to learn about them in some depth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semeonoff, B. (1981) Projective Techniques. In F. Fransella (ed.), Personality: Theory, measurement and research. London: Methuen. A short overview of the main techniques with some discussion of measures and uses.

    Google Scholar 

Questionnaires

  • Kline, P. (1981) Personality Questionnaires. In F. Fransella (ed.), Personality: Theory, measurement and research. London: Methuen. A short concise account of some of the better known questionnaires and the pitfalls of questionnaire construction.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1982 The British Psychological Society

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fransella, F. (1982). The measurement of psychological characteristics. In: Psychology for Occupational Therapists. Psychology for Professional Groups. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16882-8_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics