Skip to main content

Abstract

Volunteering is done in leisure time and is usually categorized as serious leisure by Stebbins (1996), but is sometimes casual leisure. We review here whether volunteering is essentially independent of other leisure activities or is causally associated with some other leisure activities. Volunteering types cluster empirically among themselves in survey data and with other socio-culturally approved leisure activities in a seldom-noticed leisure general activity pattern (LGAP). The existence of the LGAP can be explained mainly by three factors: (1) pressure of social norms (social conformity) regarding approved ways to spend leisure time; (2) social contagion among an individual’s close people, influencing the person to engage in other LGAP activities; and (3) the Active-Effective Character (AE-C), as a combination of personality and attitude factors. People high on LGAP are often the civic core in modern societies, a small proportion of people doing most of the active leisure/civic activities.

The objective of this chapter is to disentangle how social scientists study individual leisure activities and activity domains of adults all over the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Agrikoliansky, Eric. 2001. “New Modes of Political Participation. Political Crisis or Crisis of Models of Political Analysis.” Revue des Sciences Soci ales 28:63–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahtik, Vitomir. 1962. “Industrial Workers’ Participation in Cultural, Social, and Physical Leisure Activities.” Pp. 13–25 in Evolution of the Forms and Needs of Leisure, edited by UNESCO. Hamburg, Germany: UNESCO Institute for Education

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, Damon T., Jo Barraket, Jenny M. Lewis, and Mark Considine. 2010. “Civic Engagement and Associationalism: The Impact of Group Membership Scope versus Intensity of Participation.” European Sociological Review 28(1):43–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Allardt, Erik, P. Jartti, F. Jyrkila, and Y. Littunen. 1958. “On the Cumulative Nature of Leisure Activities.” Acta Sociologica 3: 165–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Almond, Gabriel, and Sidney Verba. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Badescu, Gabriel, and Katja Nelle. 2007. “Explaining Associational Involvement.” Pp. 187 in Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies: A Comparative Analysis, edited by J. W. van Deth, J. Montero and A. Westholm. New York: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartko, W. Todd, and Jacquelynne S. Eccles. 2003. “Adolescent Participation in Structured and Unstructured Activities: A Person-Oriented Analysis.” Journal of Youth and Adolescence 32(4):233–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Zygmunt. 1999. In Search of Politics. Stanford: Stanford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekkers, René. 2004. “Giving and Volunteering in the Netherlands: Sociological and Psychological Perspectives.” PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekkers, René. 2005. “Participation in Voluntary Associations: Relations with Resources, Personality, and Political Values.” Political Psychology 26(3):439–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekkers, René, and Pamala Wiepking. 2011. “A Literature Review of Empirical Studies of Philanthropy: Eight Mechanisms that Drive Charitable Giving.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 40(5):924–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Donald E. 1991. Human Universals. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr, Jeffrey A., Namkee G. Choi, Jan E. Mutchler, and Francis G. Caro. 2005. “Caregiving and Volunteering: Are Private and Public Helping Behaviors linked?” The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 60(5):5247–5256

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Robert N., and H. P. Gleason, eds. 1985. Productive Aging: Enhancing Vitality in Later Life. New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambré, Susan M. 1987. Good Deeds in Old Age: Volunteering by the New Leisure Class. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambré, Susan M., and Christopher Einolf. 2008. “Is Volunteering Work, Prosocial Behavior, or Leisure? An Empirical Study.” New York: Baruch College, CUNY, School of Public Affairs, Working Paper Series

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, Christopher T., Jaime E. Settle, Peter J. Loewen, Matt McGue, and William G. Iacono. 2015. “Genes, Psychological Traits, and Civic Engagement.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 370(1683): DOI 10.1098/rstb.2015.0015

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, Paul. 2004. “Social Capital of Individuals: Relational Asset or Personal Quality?” Pp. 88-110 in Investigating Social Capital: Comparative Perspectives on Civil Society, Participation and Governance, edited by S. Prakash and P. Selle. Thousand Oaks/London: Sage Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, Paul, Ruud Koopmans, and Andries van den Broek. 1997. “Voluntary Associations, Social Movements and Individual Political Behaviour in Western Europe: A Micro-Macro Puzzle.” Pp. 1–21 in Private Groups and Public Life: Social Participation, Voluntary Associations and Political Involvement in Representative Democracies, edited by J. W. van Deth. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Digman, John M. 1990. “Personality Structure: Emergence of the Five-Factor Model.” Annual Review of Psychology 41:417–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dury, Sarah, Liesbeth De Donder, Nico De Witte, Dorien Brosens, An-Sofie Smetcoren, Sofie Van Regenmortel, and Dominique Verté. 2016. “Is Volunteering in Later Life Impeded or Stimulated by Other Activities?” Research on Aging, 38(1):51–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einolf, Christopher J. 2011. “Informal and Non-Organised Volunteering.” Bonn, Germany: United Nations Volunteer Programme, External Background Paper E3, State of the World’s Volunteerism Report Project

    Google Scholar 

  • Einolf, Christopher, and Susan M. Chambré. 2011. “Who Volunteers? Constructing a Hybrid Theory.” International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 16(4):298–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahmy, Eldin. 2003. “Civic Capacity, Social Exclusion & Political Participation in Britain: Evidence from the 1999 Poverty & Social Exclusion Survey.” ESRC/ODPM Postgraduate Research Programme Working Paper 3. Bristol, UK: University of Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  • Fröding, Karin, Ingemar Elander, and Charli Eriksson 2012. “Neighborhood Development and Public Health Initiatives: Who Participates?” Health Promotion International 27(1):102–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, Howard. 2011. Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences, 3rd edition. New York: Basic Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershuny, Jonathan. 2000. Changing Times: Work and Leisure in Postindustrial Society. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerth, Hans, and C. Wright Mills. 1964. Character and Social Structure. Boston, MA: Mariner Books, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt

    Google Scholar 

  • Godbey, Geoffrey. 2007. Leisure in Your Life: New Perspectives. State College, PA: Venture

    Google Scholar 

  • Goel, M. Lal. 1980. “Conventional Political Participation.” Pp. 108-132 in Participation in Social and Political Activities, edited by D. Smith, J. Macaulay and Associates. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodale, Thomas, and Geoffrey Godbey. 1988. The Evolution of Leisure: Historical and Philosophical Perspectives. State College, PA: Venture

    Google Scholar 

  • Hank, Karsten. 2011. “Societal Determinants of Successful Aging: A Multilevel Analysis Across 11 European Countries.” European Sociological Review 27(4):526–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hank, Karsten, and Stephanie Stuck. 2008. “Volunteer Work, Informal Help, and Care among the 50+ in Europe: Further Evidence for ‘Linked’ Productive Activities at Older Ages.” Social Science Research 37: 1280–1291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinila, K. 1959. Vapaa-aika ja urheiu: Sosiologinen tutkimos miesten vapaa-ajan kay-tosta ja urheiiuharrastaksesta [Leisure and Sports: A Sociological Study of Men’s Use of Leisure and Sports Activities]. Helsinki, Finland: Porvoo

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendee, John, and Rabel J. Burdge 1974. “The Substitutability Concept: Implications for Recreation Research and Management.” Journal of Leisure Research 6: 157–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, Virginia. 2003. “Volunteering in Global Perspective.” Pp. 35–53 in The Values of Volunteering: Cross-Cultural Perspectives, edited by P. Dekker and L. Halman. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Hustinx, Lesley, Lucas Meijs, Femida Handy, and Ram Cnaan. 2012. “Monitorial Citizens or Civic Omnivores? Repertoires of Civic Participation among University Students.” Youth & Society 44(1):95–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, Ronald. 1997. Modernization and Postmodemization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkeles, Alex. 1997. National Character: A Psycho-Social Perspective. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Juster, F. Thomas, and Frank P. Stafford, eds. 1985. Time, Goods, and Well-Being: The Joint Dependence Problem. Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Center, University of Michigan

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawachi, Ichiro, and Daniel Kim. 2006. “A Multilevel Analysis of key Forms of Community- and Individual-Level Social Capital as Predictors of Self-Rated Health in the United States.” Journal of Urban Health 83(5):813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, John R. 1996. Leisure. 3rd edition. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, Martin, Karsten Hank, and Harald Kiinemund. 2009. “The Social Connectedness of Older Europeans: Patterns, Dynamics, and Contexts.” Journal of European Social Policy 19(4):327–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, Reed W., and D. Kleiber. 1993. “Free Time Activities as Factors in Adolescent Adjustment.” Pp.125–145 in Handbook of Clinical Research and Practice with Adolescents, edited by P. Tolan, and B. Cohler. New York: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitner, Michael J., and Sara F. Leitner. 2012. Leisure Enhancement. Urbana, IL: Sagamore

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannarini, Terri, Monica Legittimo, and C. Tab. 2008. “Determinants of Social and Political Participation among Youth: A Preliminary Study.” Psicologia Politica 36: 95–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Michel, Lacie M. 2007. “Personal Responsibility and Volunteering after a Natural Disaster: The Case of Hurricane Katina.” Sociological Spectrum 27(6):633–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, John, and Sarah L. Bulloch. 2012. “The Idea of a ‘Civic Core’: What Are the Overlaps Between Charitable Giving, Volunteering, and Civic Participation in England and Wales?” Birmingham, UK: Third Sector Research Centre, Working Paper 73

    Google Scholar 

  • Musick, Marc A., and Wilson, John. 2008. Volunteers: A Social Profile. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishide, Yuko, and Naoto Yamauchi. 2005. “Social Capital and Civic Activities in Japan.” The Nonprofit Review 5: 13–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Noell-Neumann, E. 1999, January 13. “Ein Museum der Irrtmet: Die Ergebnisse der Empirischen Sozialforschung finden keinen Eingang in die Gesellschaft” [A Museum of Errors: Results of Empirical Research Do Not Make their Way into Public Discourse]. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 5

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, Patrick, and Gerhard Lenski. 2006. Human Societies, 10th edition. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, Marvin E. 1982. Participatory Pluralism. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Parboteeah, K. Praveen, John B. Cullen, and Lrong Lim. 2004. “Formal Volunteering: A Cross-National Test.” Journal of World Business 39: 431–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pentland, Wendy E., Andrew S. Harvey, M. Powell Lawton, and Mary Ann McColl. 1999. Time Use Research in the Social Sciences. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Richard A. 1993. “Understanding Audience Segmentation: From Elite and Mass to Omnivore and Univore.” Poetics 21:243–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Richard A., and R. M. Kern. 1996. “Changing Highbrow Taste: From Snob to Omnivore.” American Sociological Review 61: 900–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plagnol, Anke, and Felicia Huppert (2010) “Happy to Help.” Social Indicators Research 97(2):157–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, Charles. 1962. “Dependence of Recreation Participation on Background Characteristics of Sample Persons in the September 1960 National Recreation Survey.” Pp. 77–94 in Outdoor Recreation Resources Review Commission, ORRRC Study Report no. 19. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugliese, Donato. 1986 Voluntary Associations: An Annotated Bibliography. New York: Garland

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, Paul B., and L. Kevin Selbee. 2001. “The Civic Core in Canada: Disproportionality in Charitable Giving, Volunteering, and Civic Participation.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 30: 761–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, Paul B., and L. Kevin Selbee. 2003. “Do People Who Volunteer Have a Distinctive Ethos?” Pp. 91–109 in The Values of Volunteering: Cross-Cultural Perspectives, edited by P. Dekker and L. Halman. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, John R., and Geoffrey Godbey. 1997. Time for Life: The Surprising Ways Americans Use Their Time. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, Milton. 1973. The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheufele, Dietram, and Dhavan Shah. 2000. “Personality Strength and Social Capital: The Role of Dispositional and Informational Variables in the Production of Civic Participation.” Communication Research 27(2):107–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Constance, and Anne Freedman. 1972. Voluntary Associations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, David H. 1966. “A Psychological Model of Individual Participation Informal Voluntary Organizations: Application to some Chilean Data.” American Journal of Sociology 72:249–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, David H. 1969. “Evidence for a General Activity Syndrome.” Pp. 453-454 in Proceedings of the 77th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 1969 (Vol. 4), edited by American Psychological Association. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, David H. 1975. “Voluntary Action and Voluntary Groups.” Annual Review of Sociology 1:247–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, David H. 1980. “General Activity Model.” Pp. 461–530, Chapter 19 in Participation in Social and Political Activities, edited by D. H. Smith, J. Macaulay, and Associates. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, David H. 1982. “Fundamental Intrinsic Duality, Social Scientific Debates, and the Nature of Psychosocial Modernity: A Reanalysis and Reply to Rau and Others.” American Sociological Review 47:690–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, David H. 1983. “Synanthrometrics: On Progress in the Development of a General Theory of Voluntary Action and Citizen Participation.” Pp. 80–94, in International Perspectives on Voluntary Action Research, edited by D. H. Smith, J. Van Til, and others. Washington, DC: University Press of America

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, David H. 1994. “Determinants of Voluntary Association Participation and Volunteering: A Literature Review.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 23:243–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, David H. 2015. “S-Theory as a Comprehensive Explanation of Formal Volunteering: Testing The Theory of Eveiyone on Russian National Sample Interview Data.” Paper Presented at the Annual Conference of ARNOVA, Chicago, IL, November 19–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, David H. (forthcoming) 2017. “A Survey of Major Bases of Human Social Solidarity and Pro-Sociality: Expanding the Scope of Relevant Variables with Interdisciplinary Multiplex Sociality Theory.” Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College, Dept. of Sociology, unpublished paper submitted for editorial review

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, David H. (forthcoming) 2016b. “Determinants of the Leisure General Activity Pattern (LGAP) in Russia: Confirmation of the Role of the Active-Effective Character Trait Complex as an Influence.” Chestnut Hill, MA: Department of Sociology, Unpublished paper submitted for editorial review

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, David H., and Christopher Einolf. 2012. “How program volunteering and association activity fit with other leisure activities: National USA MIDUS survey evidence for a Leisure General Activity Pattern.” Paper presented at the 20th ISTR conference in Siena, Italy, 10 July 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, David H., and Christopher Einolf. (forthcoming) 2017. “The Positive Relationship Among Different Individual Leisure Time Activities and Activity Domains: Evidence from Three U.S. Representative National Sample Surveys for a Leisure General Activity Pattem/LGAP.” Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College, Department of Sociology, unpublished paper submitted for editorial review

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, David H., Jacqueline Macaulay, and Associates. 1980. Participation in Social and Political Activities: A Comprehensive Analysis of Political Involvement, Expressive Leisure Time, and Helping Behavior. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, David H., Richard D. Reddy, and Burt R. Baldwin, eds. 1972. Voluntary Action Research 1972. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, D. C. Heath

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, David H. and John P. Robinson. (forthcoming) 2017. “Evidence from Two U.S. Representative National Sample Surveys for Empirical Clustering among Different Leisure Activities in a Leisure General Activity Pattern/LGAP.” Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College, Department of Sociology, Unpublished paper submitted for editorial review

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, David H., and Nancy Theberge. 1987. Why People Recreate. Champaign, IL: Life Enhancement Publications/Human Kinetics Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, Rodney, and Charles Y. Glock. 1968. American Piety: The Nature of Religious Commitment. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, Robert A. 1996. “Volunteering: A Serious Leisure Perspective.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Action Quarterly 25:211–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szalai, Alexander, ed. 1972. The Use of Time. The Hague: Mouton

    Google Scholar 

  • Taniguchi, Hiromi. 2010. “Who Volunteers in Japan?” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 39(1):161–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, Edgar J. 1973. “An Examination of Participants in Organizational, Political, Informational, and Interpersonal Activities.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 2(4):200–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Jonathan H. 2003. Human Institutions: A Theory of Societal Evolution. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, Sidney, Kay L. Schlozman, and Henry E. Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, Sidney, and Norman Nie. 1972. Participation in America. New York: Harper and Row

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, Sidney, Norman Nie, and Jae-on Kim. 1971. The Modes of Democratic Participation: A Cross-National Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm, Mark O., and René Bekkers. 2010. “Helping Behavior, Dispositional Empathic Concern, and the Principle of Care.” Social Psychology Quarterly 73(1):11–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, John. 1980. “The Sociology of Leisure.” Annual Review of Sociology 6:21–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, John. 2000. “Volunteering.” Annual Review of Sociology 26:215–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, John, and Marc Musick. 1998. “The Contribution of Social Resources to Volunteering.” Social Science Quarterly 79(4):799–814

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2005. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. 3rd edition. Mason, OH: Thomson/Southwestern

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Jixia, Yaping Gong, and Yuanyuan Huo. 2011. “Proactive Personality, Social Capital, Helping, and Turnover Intentions.” Journal of Managerial Psychology 26(8):739–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, D., Dury, S., Mohan, J., Stebbins, R. (2016). Volunteering as Related to Other Leisure Activities. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Volunteering, Civic Participation, and Nonprofit Associations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-26317-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-26317-9_6

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-26316-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-26317-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics