Skip to main content

A Practical Mini-Guide to Geriatric Assessment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Management of Lung Cancer in Older People

Abstract

The heterogeneity of the aging process has practical consequences for the assessment of older cancer patients: Patients need individualized assessments to approximately determine their physiological age. There is no simple way to assess physiological age, but an approach frequently used by geriatricians involves a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). Unfortunately, there is no such thing as an internationally standardized CGA. Oncologists often ask for a copy of “the CGA” scoring sheet, which does not exist. However, there is general agreement within the literature of the components that comprise a CGA: Areas where older adults often present with problems are systematically assessed. The general composition of a CGA involves functional status, comorbidity, polypharmacy, nutritional status, cognitive function, emotional status, and social support. It is important to know that in clinical geriatric medicine, the CGA is carried out in the presence of a multidisciplinary team and involves the process of developing an intervention plan for the patient. The multidisciplinary team usually includes some or all of the following specialists: a geriatrician, a geriatric nurse, a physiotherapist, an occupational therapist, a dietician, a social worker, and a pharmacist. Thus, it is more correct to speak about a geriatric assessment (GA) than a CGA in this context where isolated scoring tools are presented. We will present some of the tools that are most frequently used in the field of geriatric oncology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982;5:649–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Katz S, Downs TD, Cash HR, et al. Progress in the development of the index of ADL. Gerontologist. 1970;10:8–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment living. Gerontologist. 1969;9:179–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(3):M146–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39(2):142–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rockwood K, Andrew M, Mitnitski A. A comparison of two approaches to measuring frailty in elderly people. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007;62(7):738–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Afilalo J, Eisenberg MJ, Morin JF, Bergman H, Monette J, Noiseux N, et al. Gait speed as an incremental predictor of mortality and major morbidity in elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(20):1668–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Salvi F, Miller MD, Grilli A, Giorgi R, Towers AL, Morichi V, et al. A manual of guidelines to score the modified cumulative illness rating scale and its validation in acute hospitalized elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(10):1926–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Vellas B, Villars H, Abellan G, et al. Overview of the MNA - Its history and challenges. J Nutr Health Aging. 2006;10:456–65.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rubenstein LZ, Harker JO, Salva A, Guigoz Y, Vellas B. Screening for undernutrition in geriatric practice: developing the short-form Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA-SF). J Gerontol. 2001;56A:M366–77.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Guigoz Y. The Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA) review of the literature - What does it tell us? J Nutr Health Aging. 2006;10:466–87.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaiser MJ, Bauer JM, Ramsch C, et al. Validation of the Mini Nutritional Assessment short-form (MNA-SF): a practical tool for identification of nutritional status. J Nutr Health Aging. 2009;13:782–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hodkinson HM. Evaluation of a mental test score for assessment of mental impairment in the elderly. Age Ageing. 1972;1(4):233–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schofield I, Stott DJ, Tolson D, McFadyen A, Monaghan J, Nelson D. Screening for cognitive impairment in older people attending accident and emergency using the 4-item Abbreviated Mental Test. Eur J Emergency Med. 2010;17(6):340–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, Adey MB, et al. Development and validation of a geriatric depression scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res. 1983;17:37–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Saliba D, Elliott M, Rubenstein LZ, Solomon DH, Young RT, Kamberg CJ, et al. The vulnerable elders survey: a tool for identifying vulnerable older people in the community. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49(12):1691–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pallis AG, Wedding U, Lacombe D, Soubeyran P, Wildiers H. Questionnaires and instruments for a multidimensional assessment of the older cancer patient: what clinicians need to know? Eur J Cancer. 2010;46(6):1019–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hurria A, Togawa K, Mohile SG, Owusu C, Klepin HD, Gross CP, et al. Predicting chemotherapy toxicity in older adults with cancer: a prospective multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(25):3457–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siri Rostoft Kristjansson MD, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kristjansson, S.R. (2013). A Practical Mini-Guide to Geriatric Assessment. In: Gridelli, C., Audisio, R. (eds) Management of Lung Cancer in Older People. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-793-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-793-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-792-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-793-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics