Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How Much Force?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Essentials of Autopsy Practice

Abstract

The question of how much force was required to create a particular injury is one that pathologists are often required to answer as part of the investigation of any serious injury that may or may not result in death. Many implements are used in causing either sharp or blunt force trauma, and this chapter reviews some of the important features in determining how much force was required to create a stabbing or slashing injury with a sharp weapon and gives some additional insights into forces required for biting and creating blunt force trauma with either bottles or other weapons. It is important to consider the weapon type and geometry and also the actions of both the victim and the assailant to give as full a picture as possible as to how different injuries arise. Additionally, the structure and mechanical properties of skin are an important factor in determining the amount of force required for penetration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. J. Kielhorn, S. Melching- Kollmuß, I. Mangelsdorf, Dermal Absorption. World Health Organisation, WHO Press 2006, Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rosai J. Rosai & Ackerman’s surgical pathology. 9th ed. Edinburgh, London, New York: Mosby; 2004. p. 94–6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tregear RT. Physical functions of the skin. London, New York: Academic; 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hult AM, Goltz RW. The measurement of elastin in human skin and its quantity in relation to age. J Invest Dermatol. 1965;44:408–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dombi GW, Haut RC. The tensile strength of skin and correlations with collagen content. Advances in bioengineering. ASME. 1985;32:95–6.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Daly CH. Biomechanical properties of dermis. J Invest Dermatol. 1982;79 Suppl 1:17s–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Agache PG, Monneur C, Leveque JL, De Rigal J. Mechanical properties and young’s modulus of human skin in vivo. Arch Dermatol Res. 1980;269(3):221–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Edwards C, Marks R. Evaluation of biomechanical properties of human skin. Clin Dermatol. 1995;13(4):375–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bader DL, Bowker P. Mechanical characteristics of skin and underlying tissues in vivo. Biomaterials. 1983;4(4):305–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wilkes GL, Brown IA, Wildnauer RH. The biomechanical properties of skin. CRC Crit Rev Bioeng. 1973;1(4):453–95.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cox HT. The cleavage lines of the skin. Br J Surg. 1941;29:234–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shergold OA, Fleck NA. Mechanisms of deep penetration of soft solids, with application to the injection and wounding of skin. Proc R Soc Lond A. 2004;460:3037–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shergold OA, Fleck NA. Experimental investigation into the deep penetration of soft solids by sharp and blunt punches, with application to the piercing of skin. J Bioeng. 2005;127:838–48.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Davison AM. The incised wound in essentials of autopsy practice. In: Rutty GN, editor. Recent advances, topics and developments. London: Springer; 2003. p. 187–220.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hainsworth SV, Delaney RJ, Rutty GN. How sharp is sharp? Methods for quantifying the sharpness and penetrability of kitchen knives used in stabbings. Int J Legal Med. 2008;122:281–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. O’Callaghan PT. The biomechanics of stab wounds. Ph.D. thesis, Cardiff University, Cardiff; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  17. O’Callaghan PT, Jones MD, James DS, Leadbetter S, Holt CA, Nokes LD. Dynamics of stab wounds: force required for penetration of various cadaveric human tissues. Forensic Sci Int. 1999;104:173–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Knight B. The dynamics of stab wounds. Forensic Sci. 1975;6:249–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nolan G, Hainsworth SV, Rutty GN. Forces required for a knife to penetrate a variety of clothing types. J Forensic Sci. 2013 (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bleetman A, Watson CH, Horsfall I, Champion SM. Wounding patterns and human performance in knife attacks: optimising the protection provided by knife-resistant body armour. J Clin Forensic Med. 2003;10:243–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Watson CH, Horsfall I, Champion SM, Harrod IC. Blade sharpness and its effect on the testing of body armour. In: Proceedings of the personal armour systems symposium 2002, The Hague, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  22. Faller-Marquardt M, Pollak S. Homicide with a screwdriver and simulation of a similar offence by self-infliction of injuries. J Clin Forensic Med. 1996;3:141–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schulz F, Colmant HJ, Trubner K. Penetrating spinal injury inflicted by screwdriver: unusual morphological findings. J Clin Forensic Med. 1995;2:153–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Croft AM, Ferllini R. Macroscopic characteristics of screwdriver trauma. J Forensic Sci. 2007;52:1243–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Parmar K, Hainsworth SV, Rutty GN. Quantification of forces required for stabbing with screwdrivers and other blunter instruments. Int J Legal Med. 2012;126:43–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Saukko P, Knight B. The pathology of wounds: the incised wound. In: Saukko P, Knight B, editors. Knight’s forensic pathology. 3rd ed. London: Arnold; 2004. p. 155–66.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Madea B, Schmidt PT, Lignitz E, Padosch SA. Skull injuries caused by blows with glass bottles. In: Tsokos M, editor. Forensic pathology reviews, vol. 2. Totowa: Humana Press Inc.; 2005. p. 27–41.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Weibull WA. Statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J Appl Mech. 1951;18:293–7.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lawn BR. Fracture of brittle solids. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Nolan G, Lawes SDA, Hainsworth SV, Rutty GN. An investigation into the force required for broken glass bottles to penetrate a skin simulant. Int J Legal Med. 2012;126:19–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. O’Callaghan PT, Jones MD, James DS, Leadbetter S, Evans SL, Nokes LDM. A biomechanic reconstruction of a wound caused by a glass shard – a case report. Forensic Sci Int. 1999;117:221–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bolliger SA, Ross S, Oesterhelweg L, Thali MJ, Kneubuehl BP. Are full or empty beer bottles sturdier and does their fracture-threshold suffice to break the human skull? J Forensic Leg Med. 2009;16:138–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Preston FW. Bottle breakage—causes and types of fractures. Am Ceram Soc Bull. 1939;18:35–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Cattermole HR, Hardy JRW, Gregg PJ. The footballers fracture. J Sports Med. 1996;30:171–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Harper TE, Roberts JR, Jones R. Driver Swingweighting: a worthwhile process? Proc Inst Mech Eng. Part B - J. Eng. Manuf. 2005;219(5):385–93.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kramer M, Burrow K, Heger A. 17th STAPP car crash conference, Coronado, 1973 SAE730966 81–100.

    Google Scholar 

  37. McElhaney JH. J Appl Physiol. 1966;31:1231–6.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Philippens M, Wismans J. Proceedings of 1989 international conference on the biomechanics of impacts, Stockholm, 1989. p. 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Engineering, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, Leicestershire, LE1 7RH, UK

    Sarah V. Hainsworth BEng (Hons) PhD CEng CSci FIMMM

Authors
  1. Sarah V. Hainsworth BEng (Hons) PhD CEng CSci FIMMM
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah V. Hainsworth BEng (Hons) PhD CEng CSci FIMMM .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Forensic Pathology Unit, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Robert Kilpatrick Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester, LE2 7LX, United Kingdom

    Guy N. Rutty

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hainsworth, S.V. (2013). How Much Force?. In: Rutty, G. (eds) Essentials of Autopsy Practice. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-519-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-519-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-518-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-519-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation