Skip to main content

Understanding and Analysing Energy Demand

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Energy Economics

Abstract

This chapter introduces the concept of energy demand using basic micro-economics and presents the three-stage decision making process of energy demand. It then provides a set of simple indicators (such as price and income elasticities and energy intensity) and discusses the decomposition method and econometric method that can be used to analyse energy demand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See also Chapter 2 of Bohi (1981), Munasinghe and Meier (1993) and Medlock III (2009).

  2. 2.

    See Wilson and Dowlatabadi (2007).

  3. 3.

    This section is based on UN (1991). See also IEA (1997).

  4. 4.

    This discussion is based on Chapter 3, Energy Demand and Economic Growth, Measurement and Conceptual Issues in Policy Analysis, by C. M. Siddayao, West View Press, 1986.

  5. 5.

    Also see ODYSSEE project for energy efficiency indicators in Europe (http://www.odyssee-indicators.org/). IEA (1997) also presents a large study for IEA Member countries.

  6. 6.

    See Ang and Zhang (2000) for a detailed review. See also UN (1991).

  7. 7.

    This can also be expressed as the ratio of share of energy of a sector i and the total energy used in the economy (i.e. E i /E). This can be seen from the following relationship \( {\frac{{{\rm EI}_{i} S_{i} }}{{\sum\nolimits_{i} {{\rm EI}_{i} S_{i} } }}} = {\frac{{{\frac{{E_{i} }}{{Q_{i} }}}{\frac{{Q_{i} }}{Q}}}}{{\frac{E}{Q}}}} = {\frac{{E_{i} }}{E}}. \)

  8. 8.

    Substitute fuel price is not relevant here as the appliance has a specific fuel use capacity. This ignores the dual-fuel capability of the appliance.

  9. 9.

    The same general result is also obtained using the adaptive price expectation specification. This is presented in Annex 3.3.

  10. 10.

    This is based on Bhattacharyya and Blake (2009).

  11. 11.

    See any econometrics textbook, e.g. Pindyck and Rubinfeld (1998) for further discussions on this subject.

  12. 12.

    See any econometrics textbook, e.g. Pindyck and Rubinfeld (1998) for further discussions on this subject.

  13. 13.

    Again, this book does not enter into this.

References

  • Ang BW (1997) Decomposition of aggregate energy intensity of industry with application to China, Korea and Taiwan. Energy Environ 8(1):1–11

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ang BW, Zhang FQ (2000) A survey of index decomposition analysis in energy and environmental studies. Energy 25:1149–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ang BW (2004) Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: which is the preferred method? Energy Policy 32:1131–1139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentzen J, Engsted T (1993) Short- and long-run elasticities in energy demand: a cointegration approach. Energy Econ 15(1):9–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatia R (1987) Energy demand analysis in developing countries: a review. Energy J 8:1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya SC, Blake A (2009) Domestic demand for petroleum products in MENA countries. Energy Policy 37(4):1552–1560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya SC (2006) Renewable energies and the poor: Niche or Nexus. Energy Policy 34(6):659–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohi D (1981) Analyzing demand behaviour: a study of energy elasticities. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan HN, Lee SK (1997) Modelling and forecasting the demand for coal in China. Energy Econ 19:271–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DTI (2007) Meeting the energy challenge: a white paper on energy. Department of Trade and Industry, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle RE, Granger CW (1987) Cointegration and error-correction: representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica 55:251–276

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher FM, Kaysen C (1962) A study in econometrics: the demand for electricity in the United States. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman RS (1979) Frontiers in energy demand modelling. Annu Rev Energy 4:433–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey AC (1997) Trends, cycles and autoregressions. Economic J 107:192–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helm D (2005) The assessment: The new energy paradigm. Oxford. Rev. Econ. Pol 21(1), pp. 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEA (1997) Indicators of energy use and efficiency: understanding the link between energy and human activity, International Energy Agency, Paris (see http://www.iea.org/textbase/nppdf/free/1990/indicators1997.pdf)

  • IEA (1997) The link between energy and human activity. International Energy Agency, Paris (see http://www.iea.org/textbase/nppdf/free/1990/link97.pdf)

  • IEA (2003) Key world energy statistics 2003. International Energy Agency, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2009) Key world energy statistics 2009. International Energy Agency, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Laitner JA, DeCanio SJ, Coomey JG, Sanstand AH (2003) Room for improvement: increasing the value of energy modeling for policy analysis. Utilities Policy 11:87–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medlock III K (2009) Chapter 5: Energy demand theory. In: Evans J, Hunt LC (eds.) International handbook on the economics of energy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehra M, Bharadwaj A (2000) Demand forecasting for electricity. The Energy Resources Institute, New Delhi (http://www.regulationbodyofknowledge.org/documents/044.pdf)

  • Munasinghe M, Meier P (1993) Energy policy analysis and modeling. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck RS (1979) The structure of world energy demand. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck RS, Rubinfeld DL (1998) Econometric models and economic forecasts. McGraw-Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan DL, Ploure A (2009) Chapter 6: Empirical modeling of energy demand. In: Evans J, Hunt LC (eds) International handbook on the economics of energy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddayao CM (1986) Energy demand and economic growth, measurement and conceptual issues in policy analysis. West View Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens P (2000) An introduction to energy economics. In: Stevens P (ed.) The economics of energy, vol. 1. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. Also reproduced in two parts in the Journal of Energy Literature, vol. VI(2), December 2000, vol. VII(1) June 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun JW (1998) Changes in energy consumption and energy intensity: a complete decomposition model. Energy Econ 20(1):85–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN (1991) Sectoral energy demand studies: application of the end-use approach to Asian Countries. Energy Resources and Development Series, No. 33, United Nations

    Google Scholar 

  • Ussanarassamee A, Bhattacharyya SC (2005) Changes in energy demand in Thai industry between 1981 and 2000. Energy 30(10):1845–1857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson C, Dowlatabadi H (2007) Models of decision making and residential energy use. Annu Rev Environ Res 32:169–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worrel E, Ramesohl S, Boyd G (2004) Advances in energy forecasting models based on engineering economics. Annu Rev Environ Res 29:345–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Bauer M, Mar E (2005) Transport and energy demand in the developing world. Energy Environ 16(5):825–844 (access to PDF file through DU Library)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper JCB (2003) Price elasticity of demand for crude oil: estimates for 23 countries. OPEC Rev 27(1), 1–8 (see OPEC Review publisher website through DU Library for access to PDF file)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl C (1994) A survey of oil product demand elasticities for developing countries. OPEC Rev Spring:47–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannesson R (2002) Energy use and GDP growth. 1950–1997 OPEC Rev 26(3):215–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moroney JR (ed) (1997) Advances in the economics of energy and resources. Energy demand and supply, vol 10. Jai Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Price L, de la Rue du Can S, Sinton J, Worrell E, Nan Z, Sathaye J, Levine M (2006) Sectoral trends in global energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, CA (see http://ies.lbl.gov/iespubs/56144.pdf)

  • Watkins GC (1992) The economic analysis of energy demand: perspectives of a practitioner. In: Hawdon D (ed) Energy demand: evidence and expectations. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subhes C. Bhattacharyya .

Appendices

Annex 3.1: Consumer Demand for Energy—The Constrained Optimization Problem

Consider that the utility function of a consumer can be written as

$$ {\text{Utility}}\,u = U(X_1, X_2, X_3, \ldots, X_n) $$
(3.31)

The consumer has the budget constraint

$$ I = p_1 X_1 + p_2 X_2 + \cdots + p_n X_n $$
(3.32)

For maximization of the utility subject to the budget constraint, set the lagrange

$$ L = U(X_1, X_2, X_3, \ldots, X_n) - \lambda (I - (p_1 X_1 + p_2 X_2 + \cdots + p_n X_n )) $$
(3.33)

Setting partial derivatives of L with respect to X 1, X 2, X 3,…X n and λ equal to zero, n + 1 equations are obtained representing the necessary conditions for an interior maximum.

$$ \begin{gathered} \delta {{L}}/\delta {{X}}_{1} = \delta {{U}}/\delta {{X}}_{1} - \lambda {{p}}_{1} = 0; \hfill \\ \delta {{L}}/\delta {{X}}_{2} = \delta {{U}}/\delta {{X}}_{2} - \lambda {{p}}_{2} = 0; \\ \vdots \\ \delta {{L}}/\delta {{X}}_{{n}} = \delta {{U}}/\delta {{X}}_{{n}} - \lambda {{p}}_{{n}} = 0 \hfill \\ \delta {{L}}/\delta \lambda = {{I}} - {{p}}_{1} {{X}}_{1} + {{p}}_{2} {{X}}_{2} + \cdots + {{p}}_{{n}} {{X}}_{{n}} = 0 \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$
(3.34)

From above,

$$ \left( {\delta {{U}}/\delta {{X}}_{1} } \right)/\left( {\delta {{U}}/\delta {{X}}_{2} } \right) = {{p}}_{1} /{{p}}_{2} \;{\text{or}}\;{\text{MRS}} = {{p}}_{1} /{{p}}_{2} $$
(3.35)
$$ \lambda = (\delta {{U}}/\delta {{X}}_{1} )/{{p}}_{1} = (\delta {{U}}/\delta {{X}}_{2} )/{{p}}_{2} = \cdots = (\delta {{U}}/\delta {{X}}_{{n}} )/{{p}}_{{n}} $$
(3.36)

Solving the necessary conditions yields demand functions in prices and income.

$$ \begin{gathered} {{X}}_{1}^* = {{d}}_{1} ({{p}}_{1} ,{{p}}_{2} ,{{p}}_{3} , \ldots {{p}}_{{n}} ,{{I}}) \hfill \\ {{X}}_{2} ^* = {{d}}_{2} ({{p}}_{1} ,{{p}}_{2} ,{{p}}_{3} , \ldots {{p}}_{{n}} ,{{I}}) \hfill \\ \vdots \hfill \\ {{X}}_{{n}} ^* = {{d}}_{{n}} \left( {{{p}}_{1} ,{{p}}_{2} ,{{p}}_{3} , \ldots {{p}}_{{n}} ,{{I}}} \right) \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$
(3.37)

An individual demand curve shows the relationship between the price of a good and the quantity of that good purchased, assuming that all other determinants of demand are held constant.

Annex 3.2: Cost Minimization Problem of Producers

Consider a firm with single output, which is produced with two inputs X 1 and X 2. The cost of production is given by

$$ {\text{TC}} = {{c}}_{1} {{X}}_{1} + {{c}}_{2} {{X}}_{2} $$
(3.38)

This is subject to

$$ {\text{St}}\;{{q}}_{0} = {{f}}({{X}}_{1} ,{{X}}_{2} ) $$
(3.39)

Write the Lagrangian expression as follows:

$$ {{L}} = {{c}}_1{{X}}_1 + {{c}}_2{{X}}_2 + \lambda \left( {{{q}}_0 - {{f}}\left( {{{X}}_1,{{X}}_2} \right)} \right) $$
(3.40)

The first order conditions for a constrained minimum are:

$$ \begin{aligned} \delta {{L}}/\delta {{X}}_{1} & = {{c}}_{1} - \lambda \, \delta {{f}}/\delta {{X}}_{1} = 0 \\ \delta {{L}}/\delta {{X}}_{2} & = {{c}}_{2} - \lambda \delta {{f}}/\delta {{X}}_{2} = 0 \\ \end{aligned} $$

From above,

$$ {{c}}_1/{{c}}_2 = (\delta {{f}}/\delta {{X}}_{1} )/(\delta {{f}}/\delta {{X}}_{2} ) = {\text{RTS}}\,(X_1{\text{ for }} X_2 ) $$
(3.41)

In order to minimize the cost of any given level of input, the firm should produce at that point for which the rate of technical substitution is equal to the ratio of the inputs’ rental prices.

The solution of the conditions leads to factor demand functions.

Annex 3.3: Adaptive Price Expectation Model

Consider that Q t is related to price expectation and not the actual price level in time t.

$$ {{Q}}_{{t}} = {{a}}^* + {{b}}^*{{P}}_{{t}} ^* + {{e}}_{{t}} ^* $$
(3.42)

where P * represents expected level of prices, not actual prices

A second relationship defines the expected level of P *. It is assumed that in each time period, the expectation changes based on an adjustment process between the current observed value of P and the previous expected value of P *. The relationship is

$$ {{P}}_{{t}}^* - {{P}}_{{{{t}} - 1}}^* = {{c(P}}_{{t}} - {{P}}_{{{{t}} - 1}}^* ) $$
(3.43)
$$ {\text{or}}\;{{P}}_{{t}}^* = {{cP}}_{{t}} + (1 - {{c}}){{P}}_{{{{t}} - 1}}^* $$
(3.44)

This implies that the expected price is a weighted average of present price and the previous expected level of price.

For econometric estimation, the above equation is rearranged as follows:

$$ \begin{gathered} (1 - {{c}}){{P}}_{{{{t}} - 1}}^* = {{c(}}1 - {{c)P}}_{{{{t}} - 1}} + (1 - {{c}})^{2} {{P}}_{{{{t}} - 2}}^* \hfill \\ (1 - {{c}})^{2} {{P}}_{{{{t}} - 2}}^* = {{c(}}1 - {{c)}}^{2} {{P}}_{{{{t}} - 2}} + (1 - {{c}})^{3} {{P}}_{{{{t}} - 3}}^* \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$
(3.45)

Substituting and combing we obtain

$$ {{P}}_{{t}}^* = {{c[P}}_{{t}} + (1 - {{c}}){{P}}_{{{{t}} - 1}} + {{c(}}1 - {{c)}}^{2} {{P}}_{{{{t}} - 2}} + \cdots ]= {{c}}\sum (1 - {{c}})^{s} {{P}}_{{{{t}} - {{s}}}} $$
(3.46)

Substituting P t * in Q t , we get

$$ {{Q}}_{{t}} = {{a}}^* + {{b}}^*{{c}}\sum (1 - {{c}})^{{s}} {{P}}_{{t - s}} + {{e}}_{{t}}^* $$
(3.47)
$$ Q_{t} = a^* + b^*c\sum\limits_{s = 0}^{\infty } {(1 - c)^{s} P_{t - s} } + e_{t} ^* $$
(3.48)

Letting a = a *, b = b * c, w = (1 − c), and e t  = e t *

Q t  = a + b ∑(w)sPt − s + e t , the original geometric lag model

For econometric estimation, model is rewritten as:

$$Q_{t-1}=a^{\ast}+b^{\ast}c\sum(1-c)^{s}P_{t-s-1}+e_{t-1}^{\ast}$$
(3.49)

We calculate Q t − (1 − c)Q t−1 to obtain

$$ Q_t - (1 - c)Q_{t - 1} = a^*c + b^*c P_t + e_t^* - (1 - c)e_{t-1}^* $$
(3.50)
$$ {{Q}}_{{t}} = {{a}}^*{{c}} + {{b}}^*{{c}}\;{{P}}_{{t}} + \left( {1 - {{c}}} \right){{Q}}_{{{{t}} - 1}} + {{u}}_{{t}}^* $$
(3.51)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bhattacharyya, S.C. (2011). Understanding and Analysing Energy Demand. In: Energy Economics. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-268-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-268-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-267-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-268-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics