Skip to main content

Is Deterrence Evolutionarily Stable?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Dynamic Games and Their Applications

Part of the book series: Annals of the International Society of Dynamic Games ((AISDG,volume 10))

  • 1133 Accesses

Abstract

Deterrent behaviors are currently observed among animals. Similarly, deterrence has spread in human societies long before the nuclear era. That seems to speak for deterrence’s efficiency, or to state things in the language of evolution, for its fitness. The literature contains many case studies about the effect of deterrence on evolution. This paper aims at extending these studies, providing a general framework for analyzing the fitness of deterrent behaviors through the combination of two approaches: Evolutionary Games and Games of Deterrence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. H. Bestougeff, M. Rudnianski, Games of Deterrence and Satisficing Models Applied to Business Process Modeling, in Proceedings AAAI Spring Symposium, Stanford 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Cressmann, The Stability Concept of Evolutionary Game Theory, Springer, Berlin, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Rudnianski, P. Fabiani, On Games of Deterrence, in Qualitative Reasoning and Decision Technologies, N. Piera Carreté, M.G. Singh, Eds., pp 55–64, CIMNE Barcelona, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Fudenberg, D.K. Levine, The Theory of Learning in Games, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Gintis, Game Theory Evolving, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Hoffbauer and K. Sigmund, Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. A. Nowak, Evolutionary Dynamics, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Randolph M. Nesse, Evolution and the Capacity for Commitment, Ronald Sage Foundation, N.Y., 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Rudnianski, Deterrence Typology and Nuclear Stability, A Game Theoretical Approach, in Defense Decision Making, R. Avenhaus, H. Karkar, M. Rudnianski, Eds, Springer Verlag, pp 137–168, Heidelberg, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Rudnianski, Multipolar Deterrence in a Dynamic Environment, in IEEE Systems, Man and Cybernetics 1995, vol 5, pp 4279–4285.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Rudnianski, Nuclear Proliferation and Deterrence Stability, in Models for the Security Policy in the Post-Cold War Era, R Huber, R. Avenhaus, eds., pp-153–182, Nomos Verlag, Baden-Baden, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Rudnianski, Deterrence, Fuzzyness and Causality, in Proceedings of ISAS 96, pp 473–480, IIIS, Orlando 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Rudnianski, Games of Deterrence for Multiple Criteria Decision Making, in Proceedings of ISAS 98, vol 3, N. C. Callaos Ed., pp 633–639, Orlando, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Rudnianski, H. Bestougeff, Modeling Tasks and Teams through Game Theoretical Agents,in NASA First Goddard Workshop on Formal Approaches to Agent Based Systems, Lectures Notes in Computer Sciences N° 1871, pp 235–249, Springer Verlag, Berlin 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Rudnianski, H. Bestougeff, Modeling Multi-agent Interactions Through State Transitions in Games of Deterrence, Proceedings AAAI Spring Symposium, PP 159–162, AAAI Press, Stanford, 2001 .

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Rudnianski, H. Bestougeff, Multi-Agent Systems Reliability, Fuzzyness and Deterrence, in MG Hinchey & al, NASA FAABS 2004, LNAI 3228, pp 41–56, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2005 .

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Rudnianski, H. Bestougeff, Bridging Games and Diplomacy, presented at the 2005 American Association for the Advancement of Science Conference, to be published in Formal Models of International Negotiation, R; Avenhaus, G-O Faure, V. Kremeniuk, B. Zartmann, Eds., PIN, Vienna, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Rudnianski, A. d'Assignies, From MAD to MAD, in Strategic Stability in the Post-Cold War World and the Future of Nuclear Disarmament, M.L. Best, J. Hughes-Wilson, A. Piontkowsky, Eds., NATO ASI series, Disarmament Technologies, vol 3, pp 229–259, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Rudnianski, N. Ojeh, NATO and European Enlargment. A Methodological Perspective, in Defense Analysis for the 21st Century : Issues, Approaches, Models, R. Huber, W. Hoffmann, Eds., Nomos Verlag, Baden-Baden, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Ellison .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Birkhäuser Boston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ellison, D., Rudnianski, M. (2009). Is Deterrence Evolutionarily Stable?. In: Pourtallier, O., Gaitsgory, V., Bernhard, P. (eds) Advances in Dynamic Games and Their Applications. Annals of the International Society of Dynamic Games, vol 10. Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-4834-3_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics