Abstract
Economists have traditionally cast wildlife in the role of an “externality”, a neutral background that does not formally interact with the day-to-day business of human affairs. Yet by the time Apollo astronauts had returned with pictures of a lonely earth hanging in space, many of us concluded that there are no externalities. We inhabit a natural world that can be all too relevant to our everyday lives, however much we might try to ignore this fact. The species sharing this world can become susceptible to poisons of our making, toxic agents that might carry profound economic significance for us, but fatal consequences for a variety of plants and animals.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Butt C et al (2006) Rapid response of Arctic ringed seals to changes in perfluoroalkyl production. Environ Sci Technol 41(1):42–49
Butterworth-Heinemann et al (2001) The precautionary principle: a critical appraisal. Cato Institute, Washington
Carson R (1962) Silent spring. Haughton Mifflin, Boston
Commission of the European Communities (2000) Communication from the commission on the precautionary principle. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels
Eskenazi B et al (2009) The pine river statement: human health consequences of DDT Use. Environ Health Perspect 117(9):1359–1367
Giesy J et al (2001) Global distribution of perfluorooctane sulfonate in wildlife. Environ Sci Technol 35(7):1339–1342
Government of Canada (2003) A framework for the application of precaution in science-based decision making about risk
Hayes T et al (2002) Hermaphroditic, demasculinized frogs after exposure to the herbicide atrazine at low 808 ecologically relevant doses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:5476–5480
Leopold A (1949) A sand county Almanac. Oxford University Press, New York
Meadows D et al (1972) The limits to growth. The New American Library, New York
Ministerial Declaration of the Second International Conference on the Protection of the North Sea, ILM, 835, 25 November 1987; found on-line at http://www.seas-at-risk.org/1mages/1987%20London%20Declaration.pdf and in Morris, Julian (2000) Rethinking risk and the precautionary principle
Mooney C (2005) The republican war on science. Basic Books, New York
Sarewitz D (2004) How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environmental Sci Policy 7:385–403
Sass J, Devine J (2004) The center for regulatory effectiveness invokes the data quality act to reject published studies on atrazine toxicity. Environ Health Perspect 112(1):A18
Tozzi J et al (2004) Data quality act: response from the center for regulatory effectiveness. Environ Health Perspect 112(1):A18–A19
Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (Public Law 106–554)
Tren R, Bate R (2001) Malaria and the DDT story. The Institute of Economic Affairs, London
UNEP (1992) Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, 3–14 June 1992, A/CONF.151/26 (Vol. I)
vom Saal F et al (2008) Baby’s toxic bottle. The Work Group for Safe Markets
Welshons W et al (2006) Large effects from small exposures. III. Endocrine mechanisms mediating effects of bisphenol A at levels of human exposure. Endocrinology 147(Suppl 6):S56–S69
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lougheed, T. (2011). Where Science Stops, and Action Starts. In: Elliott, J., Bishop, C., Morrissey, C. (eds) Wildlife Ecotoxicology. Emerging Topics in Ecotoxicology, vol 3. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-89432-4_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-89432-4_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-89431-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-89432-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)