Abstract
Humanity has put itself in great peril, as the impending demise of the nation of Kiribati due to global warming illustrates. This failure to act is in part due to the influence of mainstream economics. Economics is a challenging discipline that attracts many gifted individuals. Yet during their training, mainstream economists adopt, often unwittingly and despite believing their profession to be exemplar of objectivity and dispassionate analysis, a deeply problematic ethical framework and worldview. This is shown by examining the analysis that mainstream economists have contributed to policy discussions on global warming, the profession's unfailing devotion to economic growth, and the evaluative criterion that underlies so much economic theorizing and analysis, namely economic efficiency. This chapter then explores how it is that the many gifted individuals who have become economists, often out of concern for the disadvantaged, could have been educated and socialized to adopt uncritically a morally problematic analytical framework and to provide analysis and policy advice with little reflection on its moral implications. Some changes to economics education might provide gifted future economists more sophisticated ethical bearings and improve the likelihood that their skills will contribute to finding more equitable and sustainable solutions to the pressing ecological and social problems confronting humanity.
… goods follow dollar votes and not the greatest need. A rich man's cat may drink the milk that a poor boy needs to remain healthy. Does this happen because the market is failing? Not at all, for the market mechanism is doing its job – putting goods in the hands of those who have the dollar votes.
Samuelson and Nordhaus (2005, p. 38)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
International Herald Tribune Online, “Leader of disappearing nation says climate change is an issue of survival, not economics.” At: http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/06/05/asia/AS-GEN-New-Zealand-World-Environment-Day.php. Accessed June 28, 2008.
References
Ambrose, D. (2006). Large-scale contextual influences on creativity: Evolving academic disciplines and global value systems. Creativity Research Journal 18: 75–85.
Ambrose, D., & Green, T. L. (2009). The not-so-invisible hand of economics and its impact on high ability, Manuscript submitted for publication.
Becker, W. E. (2007). Quit lying and address the controversies: There are no dogmata, laws, rules or standards in the science of economics. American Economist 51(1): 3–14.
Blaug, M. (2001). No history of ideas, please, we're economists. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 15(1): 145–164.
Bromley, D. W. (1990). The ideology of efficiency: Searching for a theory of policy analysis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 19(1): 86–107.
Brown, P. G. (1992). Climate change and the planetary trust. Energy Policy 20(3): 208–222.
Brown, P. G. (2007). The Commonwealth of life: Economics for a flourishing earth, second edition. London: Black Rose Books.
Coleman, W. (2005). Taking out the pins: Economics as alive and living in the history of economic thought. Economic Papers 24(2): 107–115.
Daly, H. E. (1992). Steady state economics, Second Edition. London: Earthscan (Original work published 1977).
Daly, H. E. (2002). Reconciling the economics of social equity and environmental sustainability. Population and Environment 24: 47–53.
Ferber, M., & Nelson, J. (2003). Feminist economics today: Beyond economic man. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. (2005). Economics language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling. Academy of Management Review 30: 8–24.
Fischer, J., Manning, A., Steffen, W., Rose, D., Daniell, K., Felton, A., (2007). Mind the sustainability gap. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22: 621–624.
Fourcade, M. (2006). The construction of a global profession: The transnationalization of economics. American Journal of Sociology 112(1): 145–194.
Fourcade-Gourinchas, M. (2001). Politics, institutional structures, and the rise of economics: A comparative study. Theory and Society 30: 397–447.
Frank, B., & Schulze, G. G. (2000). Does economics make citizens corrupt? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 43: 101–113.
Frank, R. H., Gilovich, T. D., & Regan, D. (1993). Does studying economics inhibit cooperation? The Journal of Economic Perspectives 7(2): 159–171.
Frank, R. H., Gilovich, T. D., & Regan, D. (1996). Do economists make bad citizens? The Journal of Economic Perspectives 10(1): 187–192.
Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature 40: 402–435.
Galbraith, J. K. (1998). The affluent society: 40th anniversary edition. New York: Houghton Mifflin (Original work published 1958).
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971). The entropy law and the economic process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1975). Energy and economic myths. Southern Economic Journal 41: 347–381.
Goodwin, N. (2008). From outer circle to center stage: The maturation of heterodox economics. In J. T. Harvey, & R. F. Garnett Jr. (Eds.), Future directions for heterodox economics (pp. 27–52). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Greenwald, B. C., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1986). Externalities in economies with imperfect information and incomplete markets. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 101: 229–264.
Haigh, M. (2005). Greening the university curriculum: appraising an international movement. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 29: 31–48.
Hausman, D. M., & McPherson, M. S. (1996). Economic analysis and moral philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heilbroner, R. (1990). Analysis and vision in the history of modern economic thought. Journal of Economic Literature 28: 1097–1114.
Heilbroner, R., & Milberg, W. (1995). The crisis of vision in modern economic thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huesemann, M. H. (2003). The limits of technological solutions to sustainable development. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 5: 21–34.
Hughes, J. D. (2006). Energy Supply/demand trends and forecasts: Implications for a sustainable energy future in Canada and the world. Presentation To: Federation of Canadian Municipalities 2006 Sustainable Communities National Conference and Trade Show, Ottawa, February 2–4, 2006. Natural Resources Canada Geological Survey of Canada, Calgary.
Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. London: Penguin Books.
Lee, F. S. (2004). To be a heterodox economist: The contested landscape of American economics, 1960s and 1970s. Journal of Economic Issues 38: 747–763.
Liu, J., Dietz, T., & Stern, P. (2007). Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317: 1513–1516.
Lourdes, B. (2003). Gender, development, and globalization: Economics as if all people mattered. London: Routledge.
Lovins, A. B., & Lovins, L. H. (1991). Least-cost climatic stabilization. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 16: 433–531.
Ludwig, D., Hilborn, R., & Waters, C. (1993). Uncertainty, resource exploitation, and conservation: Lessons from history. Science 260: 17–36.
Lutz, M. A., & Lux, K. (1979). The challenge of humanistic economics. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.
Mankiw, G. N. (2007). Principles of economics. Mason, OH: South-Western.
Nelson, J. A. (2008). Economists, value judgments, and climate change: A view from feminist economics. Ecological Economics 65: 441–447.
Nelson, R. (2001). Economics as religion: From Samuelson to Chicago and beyond. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Nordhaus, W. D. (1982). How fast should we graze the global c commons? American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 72(2): 242–246.
Nordhaus, W. D. (2007). A review of the stern review on the economics of global warming. Journal of Economic Literature 45: 686–702.
Ormerod, P. (1998). Butterfly economics: A new general theory of social and economic behaviour. London: Faber and Faber.
Reay, M. (2007). Academic knowledge and expert authority in American economics. Sociological Perspectives 50: 101–129.
Rees, W. (2002). An ecological economics perspective on sustainability and prospects for ending poverty. Population and Environment 24: 15–46.
Samuelson, P. A., & Nordhaus, W. D. (2005). Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Scitovsky, T. (1992). The joyless economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sen, A. (1987). On ethics and economics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Silva, E. T., & Slaughter, S. A. (1984). Serving power: The making of the academic social science expert. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
Smart, J. J. C., & Williams, B. (1973). Utilitarianism: For and against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, A. (1790). The theory of moral sentiments. London: A. Millar.
Spash, C. (2008). The economics of avoiding action on climate change. Adbusters 16(1).Spash, C. (2008). The Economics of Avoiding Action on Climate Change. Adbusters 16(1).
Spash, C. L. (2002). Greenhouse Economics: value and ethics. London: Routledge.
Stiglitz, J. (1991). The invisible hand and modern welfare economics (p. 41). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Strober, M. H. (1994). Rethinking economics through a feminist lens. The American Economic Review 84(2): 143–147.
United Nations Environment Program (2005). Living beyond our means: Natural assets and human well-being. Statement of the millennium ecosystem assessment board. Nairobi: UNEP.
van Staveren, I. (2006). The ethics of efficiency. Groningen: Human Development and Capability Association.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Green, T.L. (2009). The Efficient Drowning of a Nation: Is Economics Education Warping Gifted Minds and Eroding Human Prospects?. In: Cross, T., Ambrose, D. (eds) Morality, Ethics, and Gifted Minds. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-89368-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-89368-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-89367-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-89368-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)