Abstract
One particular, highly personal, form of social relationship following amputation relates to sexual behaviour and related concerns. Although the role of relationships, and particularly romantic and sexual relationships, are generally important in most persons’ lives, until relatively recently, the issue of sexuality following amputation has been a neglected area of research. This chapter summarizes the key literature on amputation and sexuality. This is mainly focused on males, who are lower-limb amputees, where data is collected via questionnaires or self-report surveys, with responses aggregated to ascertain the prevalence of certain pre-defined problems or issues. The sexual concerns of such persons can reasonably be expected to change over time and therefore to be different at various times following amputation and within the life course of individuals. Responses to limb losses are likely to be gendered experiences. Given the paucity of available literature on this topic and the importance of the issues surrounding it, this chapter reports the findings from a qualitative project of prosthesis use by both people with acquired amputations and those born with congenital limb deficiency on the complementary issues of gender, sexuality and romantic relationships. In this work, issues of sexuality emerged in relation to other salient meanings and experiences. In contrast to some prior research, which has had a tendency to explore sexual function and concerns in isolation, the qualitative analysis here highlights these as gendered concerns, and related to issues of forming romantic, and also sexual, relationships.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Akesode FA, Iyang UE (1981) Some social and sexual problems experienced by Nigerians with limb amputation. Trop Geogr Med 33:71–74
Badeau D (1995) Illness, disability, and aging. Sex Disabil 13:219–237
Bodenheimer C, Kerrigan AJ, Garber SL, Monga TN (2000) Sexuality in persons with lower extremity amputations. Disabil Rehabil 22:409–415
Bradway JK, Malone JM, Racy J, Leal JM, Pool J (1984) Psychological adaptation to amputation: An overview. Orthot Prosthet 38(3):46–50
Dunn DS (1996) Well-being following amputation: Salutary effects of positive meaning, optimism and control. Rehabil Psychol 41(4):285–302
Edmonson B (1988) Disability and sexual adjustment. In: Van Hasselt VB, Strain PS, Hersen M (eds) Handbook of development and physical disabilities. Pergamon Press, New York, pp 91–106
Frank G (1984) Life history model of adaptation to disability: The case of a “congenital amputee”. Soc Sci Med 19(6):639–645
Geertzen JHB, Van Es CG, Dijkstra PU (2009) Sexuality and amputation: A systematic literature review. Disabil Rehabil 31(7):522–527
Goldberg RT (1984) New trends in the rehabilitation of lower extremity amputees. Rehabil Lit 45:2–11
Ide M, Watanabe T, Toyonage T (2002) Sexuality in persons with limb amputation. Prosthet Orthot 26:189–194
Kaiser SB, Freeman CM, Wingate SB (1985) Stigmata and negotiated outcomes: Management of appearance by persons with physical disabilities. Deviant Behav 6(2):205–224
Kaiser SB, Wingate SB, Freeman CM, Chandler JL (1987) Acceptance of physical disability and attitudes toward personal appearance. Rehabil Psychol 32(1):51–58
Kasharni JH, Frank RG, Kasharni SR, Wonderlich SA (1983) Depression among amputees. J Clin Psychiatry 44:256–258
Kejlaa GH (1992) The social and economic outcome of upper limb amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int 16:25–31
Kelly M (1992) Self, identity and radical surgery. Sociol Health Illn 14(3):390–415
Lewis CE (1990) Sexual practices: Are physicians addressing the issues? J Gen Intern Med 5:S78–S81
Medhat A, Huber PM, Medhat MA (1990) Factors that influence the level of activities in persons with lower limb amputation. Rehabil Nurs 15:13–18
Murray CD (2004) An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the embodiment of artificial limbs. Disabil Rehabil 26(16):963–973
Murray CD (2005) The social meanings of prosthesis use. J Health Psychol 10(3):425–441
Murray CD (2009) The personal meanings of prosthesis use. Disabil Rehabil 31(7):573–581
Parkes CM (1975) Psychosocial transitions: Comparison between reaction to loss of a limb and loss of a spouse. Br J Psychiatry 127:204–210
Postma A, Kingma A, DeRuiter JH, Koops HS, Veth RPH, Goeken LNH, Kamps WA (1992) Quality of life in bone tumor patients comparing limb salvage and amputation of the lower extremity. Journal of Surgical Oncology 51:47–51
Randall GC, Ewalt JR, Blair H (1945) Psychiatric reaction to amputation. J Am Med Assoc 128:645–652
Reinstein L, Ashley J, Miller KH (1978) Sexual adjustment after lower extremity amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 59:501–504
Rintala DH, Howland DC, Nosek MA, Bennett JL, Young ME, Foley CC, Rossi CD, Chanpong G (1997) Dating issues for women with physical disabilities. Sex Disabil 15:219–242
Romeo AJ, Wanlass R, Arenass S (1993) A profile of psychosexual functioning in men following spinal cord injury. Sex Disabil 11:269–276
Schover LR, Jensen SB (1988) Sexual problems in chronic illness: A comprehensive approach. Guilford, New York
Shakespeare T (1996) Power and prejudice: Issues of gender, sexuality and disability. In: Barton L (ed) Disability and society: Emerging issues and insights. Longman, London, pp 191–214
Shuttleworth R (2000) The search for sexual intimacy for men with cerebral palsy. Sex Disabil 18:263–282
Smith JA (2004) Reflections on the development of interpretative phenomenological analysis and its contribution to qualitative research in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 1(1):39–54
Taleporos G (2001) Sexuality and physical disability. In: Wood C (ed) Sexual positions: An Australian view. Hill of Content Publishing, Melbourne, pp 155–166
Taleporos G, McCabe MP (2001) Physical disability and sexual esteem. Sex Disabil 19:131–148
Walters AS, Williamson GM (1998) Sexual satisfaction predicts quality of life: A study of adult amputees. Sexuality and Disability 16(2):103–115
Whipple B, Richard E, Tepper M, Komisaruk B (1996) Sexual response in women with complete spinal cord injury. Sex Disabil 14:191–201
Williamson GM, Walters AS (1996) Perceived impact of limb amputation on sexual activity: A study of adult amputees. J Sex Res 33:221–230
Young I (1990) Throwing like a girl and other essays in feminist philosophy and social theory. Indiana University Press, Indiana
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Murray, C.D. (2009). Gender, Sexuality and Prosthesis Use: Implications for Rehabilitation. In: Murray, C. (eds) Amputation, Prosthesis Use, and Phantom Limb Pain. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-87462-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-87462-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-87461-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-87462-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)