Skip to main content

DNA-Based Traceability of Meat

  • Chapter
Meat Biotechnology

Definitions of meat traceability are as varied as the people who write them. In essence, they have been encapsulated by McKean (2001) who defined traceability of meat as “the ability to maintain a credible custody of identification for animals or animal products through various steps within the food chain from the farm to the retailer”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anonymous. (2002). Source of deadly US listeria outbreak unknown. Retrieved October 21, 2002, from http://www.foodnavigator.com.

  • Arana, A., Soret, B., Lasa, I., & Alfonso, L. (2002). Meat traceability using DNA markers: Application to the beef industry. Meat Science, 61, 367–373.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aranishi, F., Okimoto, T., & Izumi, S. (2005). Identification of gadoid species (Pisces, Gadidae) by PCR-RFLP analysis. Journal of Applied Genetics,46(1), 69–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aumaître, A. (1999). Quality and safety of animal products. Livestock Production Science,59(2–3), 113–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, K. L., & Overall, A. D. J. (2004). api-calc 1.0: A computer program for calculating the average probability of identity allowing for substructure, inbreeding and the presence of close relatives. Molecular Ecology Notes,4(2), 315–318.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernués, A., Olaizola, A., & Corcoran, K. (2003). Labelling information demanded by European consumers and relationships with purchasing motives, quality and safety of meat. Meat Science,65(3), 1095–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blott, S. C., Williams, J. L., & Haley, C. S. (1999). Discriminating among cattle breeds using genetic markers. Heredity,82(Part 6), 613–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blouin, M. S. (2003). DNA-based methods for pedigree reconstruction and kinship analysis in natural populations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution,18(10), 503–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckleton, J., & Triggs, C. (2006). The effect of linkage on the calculation of DNA match probabilities for siblings and half siblings. Forensic Science International,160(2–3), 193–199.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buncic, S., McKinstry, J., Reid, C. A., & Anil, M. H. (2002). Spread of microbial contamination associated with penetrative captive bolt stunning of food animals. Food Control, 13(6–7),425–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cagney, C., Crowley, H., Duffy, G., Sheridan, J. J., O’Brien, S., Carney, E., et al. (2004). Prevalence and numbers of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in minced beef and beef burgers from butcher shops and supermarkets in the Republic of Ireland. Food Microbiology,21(2), 203–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvo, J. H., Osta, R., & Zaragoza, P. (2002). Quantitative PCR detection of pork in raw and heated ground beef and pâté. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,50(19), 5265–5267.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caporale, V., Giovannini, A., Di Francesco, C., & Calistri, P. (2001). Importance of the traceability of animals and animal products in epidemiology. OIE Revue Scientifique et Technique,20(2), 372–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castaldo, D. (2003). Brazilian beef labeled Irish. Retrieved September 26, 2003, from MeatNews.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavani, C., & Petracci, M. (2004). Rabbit meat processing and traceability. Proceedings of the 8th World Rabbit Congress, 1318–1336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Che Man, Y. B., Aida, A. A., Raha, A. R., & Son, R. (2007). Identification of pork derivatives in food products by species-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for halal verification. Food Control,18(7), 885–889.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chee, M., Yang, R., Hubbell, E., Berno, A., Huang, X. C., Stern, D., et al. (1996). Accessing genetic information with high-density DNA arrays. Science,274(5287), 610–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciampolini, R., Cetica, V., Ciani, E., Mazzanti, E., Fosella, X., Marroni, F., et al. (2006). Statistical analysis of individual assignment tests among four cattle breeds using fifteen STR loci. Journal of Animal Science,84(1), 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciampolini, R., Leveziel, H., Mazzanti, E., Grohs, C., & Cianci, D. (2000). Genomic identification of the breed of an individual or its tissue. Meat Science,54(1), 35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemens, R. (2003). Meat traceability in Japan. Iowa Ag Review,9(4), 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, F., Marchisio, E., Pizzini, A., & Cantoni, C. (2002). Identification of the goose species (Anser anser) in Italian “Mortara” salami by DNA sequencing and a Polymerase Chain Reaction with an original primer pair. Meat Science,61(3), 291–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D. N., Smith, B. A., & Cooke, H. J. (1985). An estimate of unique DNA sequence heterozygosity in the human genome. Human Genetics,69(3), 201–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornuet, J. M., Piry, S., Luikart, G., Estoup, A., & Solignac, M. (1999). New methods employing multilocus genotypes to select or exclude populations as origins of individuals. Genetics,153(4), 1989–2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, E. P., & Meghen, C. M. (2001). Biological identification systems: genetic markers. Scientific and Technical Review of the Office International des Épizooties,20(2), 491–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Pinto, A., Forte, V. T., Conversano, M. C., & Tantillo, G. M. (2005). Duplex polymerase chain reaction for detection of pork meat in horse meat fresh sausages from Italian retail sources. Food Control,16(5), 391–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, D. L., & Bailey, D. (2002). Meat traceability: Are U.S. consumers willing to pay for it? Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics,27(2), 348–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodds, K. G., & Shackell, G. H. (2004). The number of alleles seen in a mixture. Abstract MTU42. Paper presented at the XXIInd International Biometric Conference, Cairns, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodds, K. G., Tate, M. L., McEwan, J. C., & Crawford, A. M. (1996). Exclusion probabilities for pedigree testing farm animals. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 92, 966–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ElAmin, A. (2006). Belgium, Netherlands meat sectors face dioxin crisis. Retrieved January 31, 2006, from http://www.foodproductiondaily.com.

  • Evans, M. R., Lane, W., Frost, J. A., & Nylen, G. (1998). A campylobacter outbreak associated with stir-fried food. Epidemiology and Infection,121(2), 275–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evett, I. W., & Weir, B. S. (1998). Interpreting DNA evidence—statistical genetics for forensic scientists. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D. S., & Mackay, T. F. C. (1996). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Addison Wesley Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • García, D., Martínez, A., Dunner, S., Vega-Pla, J. L., Fernández, C., Delgado, J. V., & Cañón, J. (2006). Estimation of the genetic admixture composition of Iberian dry-cured ham samples using DNA multilocus genotypes. Meat Science,72(3), 560–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georges, M., Lathrop, M., Hilbert, P., Marcotte, A., Schwers, A., Swillens, S., et al. (1990). On the use of DNA fingerprints for linkage studies in cattle. Genomics,6(3), 461–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Göring, H., & Ott, J. (1997). Relationship estimation in affected sib pair analysis of late-onset diseases. European Journal of Human Genetics,5(2), 69–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley, C. S. (1995). Livestock QTLs – bringing home the bacon. Trends in Genetics, 11(12),488–492.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Håstein, T., Hill, B. J., Berthe, F., & Lightner, D. V. (2001). Traceability of aquatic animals. Scientific and Technical Review of the Office International des Épizooties,20(2), 564–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, B., Sonesson, A. K., & Gjerde, B. (2005). Evaluation of three strategies using DNA markers for traceability in aquaculture species. Aquaculture, 250(1–2), 70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, M. P., Keen, J. E., Clawson, M. L., Harhay, G. P., Bauer, N., Shultz, C., et al. (2005). Use of bovine single nucleotide polymorphism markers to verify sample tracking in beef processing. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association,226(8), 1311–1314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoban, T. J. (1997). Consumer acceptance of biotechnology: An international perspective. Nature Biotechnology,15(3), 232–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, A. L., Hobbs, J. E., Isaac, G. E., & Kerr, W. A. (2002). Ethics, domestic food policy and trade law: Assessing the EU animal welfare proposal to the WTO. Food Policy, 27(5–6), 437–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, J. E., Bailey, D., Dickinson, D. L., & Haghiri, M. (2005). Traceability in the Canadian red meat sector: Do consumers care? Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d’agroeconomie,53(1), 47–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel, C., & Weller, J. I. (2000). Effect of misidentification on genetic gain and estimation of breeding value in dairy cattle populations. Journal of Dairy Science,83(1), 181–187.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, F. W., Hägele, G. H., Buntjer, J. B., & Lenstra, J. A. (1998). Species identification in meat by using PCR-generated satellite probes. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, 21 (3), 115–120.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, A. J., Wilson, V., & Thein, S. L. (1985). Individual-specific ’fingerprints’ of human DNA. Nature,316(6023), 76–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. S., Lee, G. G., Park, J. S., Jung, Y. H., Kwak, H. S., Kim, S. B., et al. (2007). A novel multiplex PCR assay for rapid and simultaneous detection of five pathogenic bacteria: Escheria coli O157:H7, Salmonella, Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes and Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Journal of Food Protection,70(7), 1656–1662.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Latouche, K., Rainelli, P., & Vermersch, D. (1998). Food safety issues and the BSE scare: Some lessons from the French case. Food Policy,23(5), 347–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madec, F., Geers, R., Vesseur, P., Kjeldsen, N., & Blaha, T. (2001). Traceability in the pig production chain. OIE Revue Scientifique et Technique,20(2), 523–537.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maldini, M., Nonnis Marzano, F., Fortes, G. G., Papa, R., & Gandolfi, G. (2006). Fish and seafood traceability based on AFLP markers: Elaboration of a species database. Aquaculture,261(2), 487–494.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manel, S., Gaggiotti, O. E., & Waples, R. S. (2005). Assignment methods: matching biological questions with appropriate techniques. Trends in Ecology & Evolution,20(3), 136–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T. C., Slate, J., Kruuk, L. E. B., & Pemberton, J. M. (1998). Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Molecular Ecology, 7, 639–655.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matsunaga, T., Chikuni, K., Tanabe, R., Muroya, S., Nakai, H., Shibata, K., et al. (1998). Determination of mitochondrial cytochrome B gene sequence for red deer (Cervus Elaphus) and the differentiation of closely related deer meats. Meat Science,49(4), 379–385.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matsunaga, T., Chikuni, K., Tanabe, R., Muroya, S., Shibata, K., Yamada, J., & Shinmura, Y. (1999). A quick and simple method for the identification of meat species and meat products by PCR assay. Meat Science,51(2), 143–148.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maudet, C., & Taberlet, P. (2002). Holstein’s milk detection in cheeses inferred from melanocortin receptor 1 (MC1R) gene polymorphism. Journal of Dairy Science, 85(4), 707–715.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McKean, J. D. (2001). The importance of traceability for public health and consumer protection. OIE Revue Scientifique et Technique,20(2), 363–371.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meghen, C. N., Scott, C. S., Bradley, D. G., MacHugh, D. E., Loftus, R. T., & Cunningham, E. P. (1998). DNA based traceability techniques for the beef industry. Animal Genetics, 29S1, 48–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miraglia, M., Berdal, K. G., Brera, C., Corbisier, P., Holst-Jensen, A., Kok, E. J., et al. (2004). Detection and traceability of genetically modified organisms in the food production chain. Food and Chemical Toxicology,42(7), 1157–1180.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hanlon, K. A., Catarame, T. M. G., Blair, I. S., McDowell, D. A., & Duffy, G. (2005). Comparison of a real-time PCR and an IMS/culture method to detect Escherichia coli O26 and O111 in minced beef in the Republic of Ireland. Food Microbiology,22(6), 553–560.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Orrú, L., Napolitano, F., Catillo, G., & Moioli, B. (2006). Meat molecular traceability: How to choose the best set of microsatellites? Meat Science,72(2), 312–317.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ozawa, T., Lopez-Villalobos, N., & Blair, H. T. (2005). An update on beef traceability regulations in Japan. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production, 65, 80–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paetkau, D., Slade, R., Burden, M., & Estoup, A. (2004). Genetic assignment methods for the direct, real-time estimation of migration rate: a simulation-based exploration of accuracy and power. Molecular Ecology,13(1), 55–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pancaldi, M., Carboni, E., Paganelli, A., Righini, G., Salvi, A., Fontanesi, L., et al. (2006). Use of a natural tracer combined with the analysis of its DNA to guarantee the authenticity of agro-food products: The Authentifood system applied to typical dry-cured hams. Industrie Alimentari,45(463), 1147–1155.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M., & Donnelly, P. (2000). Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics, 155(2), 945–959.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of July 17, 2000 establishing a system for the identification and registration of bovine animals regarding the labelling of beef products and repealing Council Regulation (EC), No. 820/97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudenko, L., & Matheson, J. C. (2007). The US FDA and animal cloning: Risk and regulatory approach. Theriogenology,67(1), 198–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saez, R., Sanz, Y., & Toldrá, F. (2004). PCR-based fingerprinting techniques for rapid detection of animal species in meat products. Meat Science,66(3), 659–665.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., & Maniatis, T. (1989). Molecular cloning: a Laboratory Manual (2nd ed.). Cold Spring Harbor, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sancristobal, M., & Chevalet, C. (1997). Error tolerant parent identification from a finite set of individuals. Genetical Research,70(1), 53–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, C. M., White, D. G., Ge, B., Zhang, Y., McDermott, P. F., Ayers, S., Zhao, S., & Meng, J. (2003). Isolation of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli from retail meats purchased in Greater Washington, DC, USA. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 85(1–2),197–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackell, G. H. (2005). Traceability systems in the meat industry. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production, 65, 97–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackell, G. H., Mathias, H. C., Cave, V. M., & Dodds, K. G. (2005). Evaluation of microsatellites as a potential tool for product tracing of ground beef mixtures. Meat Science, 70(2),337–345.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shackell, G. H., Tate, M. L., & Anderson, R. M. (2001). Installing a DNA-based traceability system in the meat industry. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 14, 533–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. G., Cousens, S. N., Huillard D’Aignaux, J. N., Ward, H. J. T., & Will, R. G. (2004). The Epidemiology of Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, 284, 161–191.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taberlet, P., & Luikart, G. (1999). Non-invasive genetic sampling and individual identification. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 68, 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tate, M. L. (2001). Traceability of meat products – application of DNA technology. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grasslands Association, 63, 255–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S. C., & Hill, W. G. (2002). Sibship reconstruction in hierarchical population structures using Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques. Genetical Research,79(03), 227–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, J. J., Elliott-Smith, W., & Radosta, T. (2006). Laboratory information management system chain of custody: Reliability and security. Journal of Automated Methods and Management in Chemistry, Article id 74907 4 pages doi: 10.1155 JAMMC/2006/74907.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van De Casteele, T., Galbusera, P., & Matthysen, E. (2001). A comparison of microsatellite-based pairwise relatedness estimators. Molecular Ecology,10(6), 1539–1549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez, J. F., Pérez, T., Ureña, F., Gudín, E., Albornoz, J., & Domínguez, A. (2004). Practical Application of DNA Fingerprinting To Trace Beef. Journal of Food Protection, 67, 972–979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, W. (2001). Beliefs, attitude and behaviour towards fresh meat revisited after the Belgian dioxin crisis. Food Quality and Preference,12(8), 489–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, W., Frewer, L. J., Scholderer, J., & De Brabander, H. F. (2007). Why consumers behave as they do with respect to food safety and risk information. Analytica Chimica Acta,586(1–2 SPEC. ISS.), 2–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vignal, A., Milan, D., SanCristobal, M., & Eggen, A. (2002). A review on SNP and other types of molecular markers and their use in animal genetics. Genetics Selection Evolution,34(3), 275–305.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Villani, F., Russo, F., Blaiotta, G., Moschetti, G., & Ercolini, D. (2005). Presence and characterisation of verotoxin producing E. coli in fresh Italian pork sausages, and preparation and use of an antibiotic-resistant strain for challenge studies. Meat Science,70(1), 181–188.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vos, P., Hogers, R., Bleeker, M., Reijans, M., Van de Lee, T., Hornes, M., et al. (1995). AFLP: A new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Research,23(21), 4407–4414.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weir, B. S., Anderson, A. D., & Hepler, A. B. (2006). Genetic relatedness analysis: modern data and new challenges. Nature Reviews Genetics,7(10), 771–780.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. G. K., Kubelik, A. R., Livak, K. J., Rafalski, J. A., & Tingey, S. V. (1990). DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Research,18(22), 6531–6535.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shackell, G., Dodds, K. (2008). DNA-Based Traceability of Meat. In: Toldrá, F. (eds) Meat Biotechnology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79382-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics