Skip to main content

Decision Models for the Movie Industry

  • Chapter
Handbook of Marketing Decision Models

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In a separate regression equation, Ravid (1999) also considered “return-to-investment” as the dependent variable. The R-square value is low (0.25), and MPAA ratings (G, PG) are the only significant predictors.

  2. 2.

    In a related study, Krider et al. (2005) used a graphical approach to model the lead-lag relationship between distribution and demand for motion pictures. They found that, after the first week, the number of theatres a movie is shown is influenced by its performance in the previous week.

  3. 3.

    In the paper, the author also estimated other specifications that are similar (and some slightly more general) than Equation (13.18). Interested readers are encouraged to see Davis (2006) for more details.

  4. 4.

    We thank Fred Zufryden for this suggestion.

Reference

  • Ainslie, A., X. Dreze, F. Zufryden. 2005. Modeling Movie Life Cycle and Market Share. Marketing Science 24(3) 508–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, K.R. 1993. Elements of Sequencing and Scheduling. Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, F.M. 1969. A New Product Growth Model for Consumer Durables. Management Science 15 215–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blattberg, R.C., S.J. Hoch. 1990. Database Models and Managerial Intuition: 50% Models and 50% Manager. Management Science 38(8) 887–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dana, J.D. Jr., K.E. Spier. 2001. Revenue Sharing in the Video Rental Industry. Journal of Industrial Economics 49(3) 223–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, P. 2005. The Effect of Local Competition on Retail Prices: The U.S. Motion Picture Exhibition Market. Journal of Law and Economics 48(2) 677–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, P. 2006. Measuring the Business Stealing, Cannibalization and Market Expansion Effects Of Entry in the Motion Picture Exhibition Market. Journal of Industrial Economics 54(3) 293–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner, Z., B.A. Pasternack. 1999. The Videotape Rental Model. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Decision Sciences 3 163–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easingwood, C.J., V. Mahajan, E. Muller. 1983. A Nonuniform Influence Innovation Diffusion Model of New Product Acceptance. Marketing Science 2(3) 273–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einav, L. 2007. Seasonality in the U.S. Motion Picture Industry. RAND Journal of Economics 38(1) 127–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elberse, A., J. Eliashberg. 2003. Demand and Supply Dynamics for Sequentially Released Products in International Markets: The Case of Motion Pictures. Marketing Science 22(3) 329–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliashberg, J., A. Elberse, Mark A.A.M. Leenders. 2006. The Motion Picture Industry: Critical Issues in Practice, Current Research, and New Research Directions. Marketing Science 25(6) 638–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliashberg, J., S.K. Hui, J.Z. Zhang. 2007. From Storyline to Box Office: A New Approach for Green-Lighting Movie Scripts. Management Science 53(6) 881–893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliashberg, J., J.-J. Jonker, M.S. Sawhney, B. Wierenga. 2000. MOVIEMOD: An Implementable Decision-Support System for Prerelease Market Evaluation of Motion Pictures. Marketing Science 19(3) 226–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliashberg, J., S. Swami, C.B. Weinberg, B. Wierenga. 2001. Implementation and Evaluation of SilverScreener: A Marketing Management Support System for Movie Exhibitors. Interfaces: Special Issue on Marketing Engineering 31(3) S108–S127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerchak, Y., R.K. Cho, S. Ray. 2006. Coordination of Quantity and Shelf-Retention Timing in the Video Movie Rental Industry. IIE Transactions 38 525–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennig-Thurau, T., M.B. Houston, S. Sridhar. 2006). Can Good Marketing Carry a Bad Product? Evidence from the Motion Picture Industry. Marketing Letters 17 205–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeuland, A., S. Shugan. 1983. Managing Channel Profits. Marketing Science 2(3) 239–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J.M., C.J., Ritz. 1991. Incorporating Distribution into New Product Diffusion Models. International Journal of Research in Marketing 8 91–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krider, R.E., C.B. Weinberg. 1998. Competitive Dynamics and the Introduction of New Products: The Motion Picture Timing Game. Journal of Marketing Research 35(1) 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krider, R.E., T. Li, Y. Liu, C.B. Weinberg. 2005. The Lead-Lag Puzzle of Demand and Distribution: A Graphical Method Applied to Movies. Marketing Science 24(4) 635–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lariviere, M.A., G.P. Cachon. 2002. Supply Chain Coordination with Revenue Sharing Contracts. Management Science 51(1) 30–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, D.R., C.B. Weinberg. 2000. Sales Through Sequential Distribution Channels: An Application to Movies and Videos. Journal of Marketing 64 18–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilien, G.L., A. Rangaswamy. 2005. Marketing Engineering. Trafford Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litman, B.R., H. Ahn. 1998. Predicting Financial Success of Motion Pictures: The Early ‘90s Experience. Litman B.R., Ed.. The Motion Picture Mega-Industry. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y. 2006. Word of Mouth for Movies: Its Dynamics and Impact on Box Office Revenue. Journal of Marketing 70(3) 74–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodish, L. 2001. Building Marketing Models that Make Money. Interfaces: Special Issue on Marketing Engineering. 31(3), Part 2 S45–S55.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, T., R. Staelin. 1983. An Industry Equilibrium Analysis of Downstream Vertical Integration. Marketing Science 2(2) 161–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer, J.H. 2006. Vertical Contracts in the Video Rental Industry. Working Paper, Harvard Department of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moul, C.C. 2005. A Concise Handbook of Movie Industry Economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, A., V. Mahajan, B.J. Bronnenberg. 2004. Product Entry Timing in Dual Distribution Channels: The Case of the Movie Industry. Review of Marketing Science: Vol. 2, Article 4. http://www.bepress.com/romsjournal/vol2/iss1/art4

  • Pringle, L., R.D. Wilson, E.J. Brody. 1982. NEWS: A Decision Analysis Model for New Product Analysis and Forecasting. Marketing Science 1(1) 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, S.A. 1999. Information, Blockbusters, and Stars: A Study of the Film Industry. Journal of Business 72(4) 463–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawhney, M.S., J. Eliashberg. 1996. A Parsimonious Model for Forecasting Gross Box-Office Revenues of Motion Pictures. Marketing Science 15(2) 113–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silk, A., G.L. Urban. 1978. Pre-test Market Evaluation of New Packaged Goods: A Model and Measurement Methodology. Journal of Marketing Research 15(2) 171–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, P., A. Zoltners. 2001. Sales-Force Decision Models: Insights from 25 Years of Implementation. Interfaces: Special Issue on Marketing Engineering 31(3), Part 2 S108–S127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standard and Poor’s. 2006. Industry Surveys: Movies and Home Entertainment. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swami, S., J. Eliashberg, C.B. Weinberg. 1999. SilverScreener: A Modeling Approach to Movie Screens Management. Marketing Science 18(3) 352–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Variety. 2004.H'w'd Vexed by Plex Success: Newly Healthy Chains Dueling for Better Film Rental Terms. May 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, H.L. 2001. Entertainment Industry Economics: A guide for Financial Analysis, 6th Ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall Street Journal. 2006. Creative Financing: Defying the Odds, Hedge Funds Bet Billions on Movies. April 29–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, D. 2005. Hollywood’s Road to Riches. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, C.B. 2005. Profits Out of the Picture: Research Issues and Revenue Sources Beyond the North American Box Office. Moul, C. Ed. A Concise Handbook of Movie Industry Economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierenga, B., G.H. Van Bruggen, R. Staelin. 1999. The Success of Marketing Management Support Systems. Marketing Science 18(3) 196–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zufryden, F.S. 1996. Linking Advertising to Box Office Performance of New Film Releases: A Marketing Planning Model. Journal of Advertising Research July–August 29–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zufryden, F.S. 2000. New Film Website Promotion and Box-Office Performance. Journal of Advertising Research 40(1) 55–64.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jehoshua Eliashberg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eliashberg, J., Weinberg, C.B., Hui, S.K. (2008). Decision Models for the Movie Industry. In: Wierenga, B. (eds) Handbook of Marketing Decision Models. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 121. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-78213-3_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics