Abstract
This investigation into the real estate practices of indigenous peoples in Southern Africa is accomplished through an extensive literature review and interviews undertaken with tribal members across Southern Africa. Literature of indigenous real estate studies and South African real estate history and laws are addressed. The conventional U.S. and North European model of real estate (e.g., the real estate bundle of rights) is examined and juxtaposed with the scenario that exists in six tribes in four nations, as well as three overlapping/derivative/melded cultures in South Africa and adjacent countries in Southern Africa. The study draws the conclusion that the U.S. bundle of rights applies in parts, but communal rights, (which are often not reflective of the private bundle of rights) play a dominant and important role in real estate decisions and relationships. Communal arrangements implemented and managed by tribal Chiefs in Southern Africa often dominate outside urban areas. Yet, in South Africa, tribal lands operate in a dual system, with the tribal systems placing substantial limits on control and disposition, without offering the potential for conventional financing, and often not offering formal ownership. Governments across the Southern African region are developing land management and ownership systems that challenge traditional African land ownership and transfer systems, making it possible for households to acquire some of the rights associated with formal real estate ownership. But, at the same time, the formal system comes with its problems, which include slow bureaucratic procedures and associated costs which the poor cannot afford. This also implies that Real estate development in a dual land title system along the urban edge of cities, remains a challenge for policy makers, The challenge lies in finding institutional mechanisms that gradually transform one type of real estate ownership into another, but which at the same time offers the advantages of the market and indigenous land transfer and management systems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In certain cases, there is also evidence that land ownership is influenced by gender issues. This is particularly true when property is transferred as part of an inheritance, with sons often receiving preference.
References
Botlhale, Emmanuel. 2005. Cattle rancher and member of Tswana tribe. Personal Interview, December 30–31, Kanye, Botswana.
Donahoe, Brian. 2002 “Hey You! Get Offa My Taiga! Comparing the Sense of Property Rights among the Tofa and Tozhu-Tyva”. Unpublished Working Paper #38, Max Planck Institute Land Act; Act 27 of 1979. Government Gazette, Maseru
Mantiziaris, C and D. Martin. 2000. Native Title Corporations: a legal and anthropological analysis. Leichhardt: Federation press: p.98.
Miles, Mike, et al. 2001. Real Estate Development. Washington DC: Urban Land Institute Press.
Mogale, Thomas, Alan Mabin and Alain Durand-Lasserve. 2005. “Residential tenure security in South Africa – shifting relationships between customary, informal and formal systems”. Working paper. University of the Witswatersrand.
Mosaase A. undated. Lesotho’s Land Policy under the Land Act and its implications for the agricultural sector; Land Commissioner, department of Lands, surveys and Physical Planning, Maseru, Lesotho.
Motsepe, Fanuel. 2005. Architect. Personal Interview on Tswana tribe, November 23, 2005, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Newell, G., P. Acheampong and P.Du Plessis. 2002. “The Real Estate Markets in South Africa”. Journal of Real Estate Literature 10:2, 279–296.
United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (UNCHS). 1999. Reassessment of Urban Planning and Development Regulations In African Cities. Nairobi.
Widlok, Thomas. 2000. “Dealing with Institutional Changes in Property Regimes: An African Case Study”. Unpublished Working Paper #12, Max Planck Institute.
Widlok, Thomas. 2001. “Equality, Group Rights, and Corporate ownership of Land: a comparative perspective of indigenous dilemmas in Australia and Namibia”. Unpublished Working Paper #21, Max Planck Institute.
Wilson, P., P. Du Plessis and J. Pienaar. 2000, “Land Claims of Indigenous Peoples-The Impact on Property Values: A comparative Study on South Africa and Australia”. Journal of Real Estate Literature 8:1: 35–56.
www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/reference_maps/pdf/africa.pdf
Additional Resources (not cited)
Adams, Martin, Sipho Sibanda and Stephen Turner. Land Tenure Reform and Rural Livelihoods in Southern Africa. Tenure reform in Southern Africa – country case studies.
Harrison, P. 1992. The Policies and Politics of Informal Settlement in South Africa: A Historical Perspective, African Insight, 1.
Miller, D.L. and A. Pope. 2000. Land Title in South Africa, Juta & Co Ltd, Kenwyn.
Mpaketsane, N.K. 2005. Chief of Southern Limpopo Lemba tribe. Personal interview, December 13–14, 2005 India Village, (Limpopo Province), South Africa.
Scheepers, Theo. 2000. A Practical guide to Law and Development, Juta and Co Ltd.
Selebalo, C.Q. 2001 Land Reform and Poverty Alleviation; Lesotho’s experiences during the last two decades; Land Management and Administration Presented at the Regional Conference for land Reform Poverty Alleviation in Southern Africa; 4th and 5th June 2001.
Shapera, Issac. 1930. The Khoisan People of South Africa: Bushmen and Hottentots. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Tanzania Government. 1998, “Tanzania Land Act. p.146 (cited in S. Mundene 2002, p.146”).
Terbanche, N. 1996. Restitution of the Land Rights in South Africa: Issues and Challenges to Property Valuers, Australian Land Economics Review, 2:2, 3–11.
Thomas, P. and Van der Merwe. 2000. Historical Foundations of South African Private Law, 2 nd Edition, Butterworths, Durban.
Van Der Walt, A. 1991. Land Law Without the Land Acts: Predicaments and Possibilities, Journal of Contemporary Roman-Dutch Law, 54:4, 738–751.
Van Zyl, J. and N. Vink .1996. An Agricultural Economic View on Land Taxation in South Africa, Journal of Property Tax Assessment and Administration, 2:1, 101–121.
Volker. K. and W. Olima. 2002. “Urban land Management in Africa” Spring Centre, Faculty of Spatial Planning, University of Dortmund, Germany.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Makhomo Macheli and Maduna Clive, who assisted in the literature review and conducted some of the interviews with key tribal leaders. We also wish to acknowledge the Fulbright Foundation for providing a scholarship for Dr. Simons to come to South Africa.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Simons, R.A., Viruly, F.M. (2008). Real Estate Practices Among Indigenous Peoples in Southern Africa: A Clash of Real Estate Systems on the Urban Fringe. In: Simons, R.A., Malmgren, R., Small, G. (eds) Indigenous Peoples and Real Estate Valuation. Research Issues in Real Estate, vol 10. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77938-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77938-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-77937-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-77938-6
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)