Skip to main content

Metadata for describing learning scenarios under the European Higher Education Area paradigm

  • Conference paper
Metadata and Semantics

n this paper we identify the requirements for creating formal descriptions of learning scenarios designed under the European Higher Education Area paradigm, using competences and learning activities as the basic pieces of the learning process, instead of contents and learning resources, pursuing personalization. Classical arrangements of content based courses are no longer enough to describe all the richness of this new learning process, where user profiles, competences and complex hierarchical itineraries need to be properly combined. We study the intersection with the current IMS Learning Design specification and the additional metadata required for describing such learning scenarios. This new approach involves the use of case based learning and collaborative learning in order to acquire and develop competences, following adaptive learning paths in two structured levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. IMS: WG12: Learning Design. Available at http://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kasanoff, B.: Making it Personal: how to profit from personalization without invading privacy. Perseus Publishing (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ausubel, D.P., Noval, J.D., Hanessian, H.: Educational Psychology. A cognitive view. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mor, E., Minguillón, J., Garreta-Domingo, M., Lewis, S.: A three-level approach for analyzing user behavior in ongoing relationships. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Beijing, China (2007) 971–980

    Google Scholar 

  5. Minguillón, J.: Education and pedagogy with learning objects and learning designs. Computers in Human Behavior 23 (2007) 2581–2584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Guardia, L., Sangrá, A., Maina, M.: Case method in vtle: An effective tool for improving learning design. In: Proceedings of the 4th EDEN Research Workshop, Barcelona, Spain (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sicilia, M.A.: Ontology-based competency management: Infrastructures for the knowledge-intensive learning organization. In: Intelligent learning infrastructures in knowledge intensive organizations: A semantic web perspective, Idea Group (2005) 302–324

    Google Scholar 

  8. IEEE: WG12: Learning Object Metadata. Available at http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/index.html (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guerrero, A.E., Minguillón, J.: Metadata for describing educational competencies: The uoc case. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies. (2006) 275–280

    Google Scholar 

  10. Biggs, J.B.: Evaluating the Quality of Learning- the SOLO Taxonomy. Academic Press, New York (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bloom, B.: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. David McKay Co Inc, New York (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  12. González, J., Wagenaar, R.: Tuning educational structures in Europe. Technical report (2003) Available at http://www.relint.deusto.es/TuningProject/index.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ng, A., Hatala, M., Gasevic, D. In: Ontology-based Approach to Learning Objective Formalization. IGP (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Woelk, D.: E-learning semantic web services and competency ontologies. In: Proceedings of World conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications. (2002) 2077–2078

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wiley, D.A.: The Instructional Use of Learning Objects. Agency for Instructional Technology (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chatti, M.A., Klamma, R., Quix, C., Kensche, D.: Lm-dtm: An environment for xml-based, lip/papi-compliant deployment, transformation and matching of learner models. In: ICALT, IEEE Computer Society (2005) 567–569

    Google Scholar 

  17. IEEE: WG12: Personal and Private Information. (Available at http://edutool.com/papi/)

    Google Scholar 

  18. IMS: WG12: Learner Information Package. (Available at http://www.imsglobal.org/profiles/index.html)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Aroyo, L., Dolog, P., Houben, G., Kravcik, M., Naeve, A., Nilsson, M., Wild, F.: Interoperability in personalized adaptive learning. Educational Technology & Society 9 (2006) 4–18

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this paper

Cite this paper

Guerrero, AE., Minguillón, J., Guàrdia, L., Sangrà, A. (2009). Metadata for describing learning scenarios under the European Higher Education Area paradigm. In: Sicilia, MA., Lytras, M.D. (eds) Metadata and Semantics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77745-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77745-0_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-77744-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-77745-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics