Skip to main content

Integrating Concepts: Demonstration of a Multilevel Model for Exploring the Rise of Mutualism Value Orientations in Post-industrial Society

  • Chapter
Who Cares About Wildlife?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (1973). The coming of post-industrial society: A venture in social forecasting. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bright, A., Manfredo, M. J., & Fulton, D. (2000). Segmenting the public: An application of value orientations to wildlife planning in Colorado. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 28(1), 218–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. L., Connelly, N. A., & Decker, D. J. (2006). Participation in and orientation of wildlife professionals toward consumptive wildlife use: A resurvey. HDRU Series Report No. 06-1. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttel, F. H., & Humphrey, C. R. (2002). Sociological theory and the natural environment. In R. E. Dunlap, & W. Michelson (Eds.), Handbook of environmental sociology (pp. 33–69). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catton, W. R. Jr., & Dunlap, R. (1980). A new ecological paradigm for post-exuberant sociology. American Behavioral Scientist, 24, 15–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, W. W. (1993). The Development of American Agriculture: A Historical Analysis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayer, A. A., Stinchfield, H. M., & Manfredo, M. J. (2007). Stories about wildlife: Developing an instrument for identifying wildlife value orientations cross-culturally. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 12(5), 307–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D.A., & Tremblay, K. R. (1977). The quality of life in rural America. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 429, 115–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dizard, J. E. (2003). Mortal stakes: Hunters and hunting in contemporary America. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1990). The pangolin revisited: A new approach to animal symbolism. In R. G. Willis (Ed.), Signifying Animals: Human Meaning in the Natural World (pp. 25–36). London: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, R. E. (2002). An enduring concern: Light stays green for environmental protection. Policy Perspective, September/October, 13(5), 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, A. P. (1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99, 689–723.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, D. C., Manfredo, M. J., & Lipscomb, J. (1996). Wildlife value orientations: A conceptual and measurement approach. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 1(2), 24–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hand, C. M., & Van Liere, K. D. (1984). Religion, mastery-over-nature, and environmental concern. Social Forces, 63, 555–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heberlein, T. A. (1991). Changing attitudes and funding for wildlife: Preserving the sporthunter. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 19, 528–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, D. J. (2003). The hunter’s aim: The cultural politics of American sport hunters, 1880–1910. Journal of Leisure Research, 35, 455–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2002). The pitfalls of cross-national survey research: A reply to the article by Spector et al. on the psychometric properties of the Hofstede Values Survey Module 1994. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 170–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homer, P. M., & Kahle, L. R. (1988). A structural equation test of the Value-Attitude-Behavior Hierarchy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 638–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial societies. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 19–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change and Democracy: The human development sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (1994). From trust to domination: An alternative history of human-animal relations. In A. Manning, & J. Serpell (Eds.), Animals and human society: Changing perspectives (pp. 1–22). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, M. H. (2007). Wildlife value orientations in the Netherlands. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 12(5), 359–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, L. (2006). Ballot measure wrap-up. The Rothenberg Political Report. Retrieved Tuesday, November 21, 2006 from http://rothenbergpoliticalreport.blogspot.com/2006/11/ballot-measure-wrap-up.html.

  • Kaczensky, P. (2007). Wildlife value orientations of rural Mongolians. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 12(5), 317–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katcher, A., & Wilkins, G. (1993). Dialogue with animals: Its nature and culture. In S. R. Kellert, & E. O. Wilson (Eds.), The Biophilia Hypothesis (pp. 173–200). Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellert, S. R. (1976). Perceptions of animals in American society. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, 41, 533–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluckholn, C. (1951). Values and value orientations in the Theory of Action. In T. Parsons, & E. A. Shils (Eds.), Toward a general Theory of Action (pp. 388–433). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluckholn, F. R., & Strodtbeck, F. (1961). Variations in value orientations. Evanston: Row, Peterson, & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maio, G. R., Olson, J. M., Bernard, M. M., & Luke, M. A. (2003). Ideologies, values, and behavior. In J. Delamater (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 283–308). London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manfredo, M. J., & Zinn, H. C. (1996). Population change and its implications for wildlife management in the new west: A case study of Colorado. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 1, 62–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manfredo, M. J., Teel, T. L., & Bright, A. D. (2004). Application of the concepts of values and attitudes in human dimensions of natural resources research. In M. J. Manfredo, J. J. Vaske, D. Field, & P. J. Brown (Eds.), Society and Natural Resources: A summary of knowledge prepared for the 10th International Symposium on Society and Natural Resources (pp. 271–282). Jefferson, MO: Modern Litho.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manfredo, M. J., Teel, T., & Henry, K. (2007). Modernization and the rise of mutualism in human-wildlife relationships. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milton, K. (1996). Environmentalism and cultural theory: Exploring the role of Anthropology in environmental discourse. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Minnis, D. L. (1998). Wildlife policy-making by the electorate: An overview of citizen-sponsored ballot measures on hunting and trapping. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 26, 75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mithen, S. (1996). The prehistory of the mind. London: Thames & Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muth, R. M., & Jamison, W. V. (2000). On the destiny of deer camps and duck blinds: The rise of the animal rights movement and the future of wildlife conservation. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 28, 841–851.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organ, J. F., & Fritzell, E. K. (2000). Trends in consumptive recreation and the wildlife profession. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 28, 780–787.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peyton, R. B. (2000). Wildlife management: Cropping to manage or managing to crop? Wildlife Society Bulletin, 28, 774–779.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratto, F. (1999). The puzzle of continuing group inequality: Piecing together psychological, social and cultural forces in social dominance theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 191–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raadik, J., & Cottrell, S. (2007). Wildlife value orientations: An Estonian case study. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 12(5), 347–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, methods, and applications (Vol. 18, Cross Cultural Research and Methodology Series, pp. 85–119). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (2004). Basic human values: Their content and structure across cultures. In A. Tamayo, & J. Porto (Eds.), Vialores e Trabalho. Brazil: Editora Universidade de Brasilis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5, 136–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serpell, J. A. (2003). Anthropomorphism and anthropomorphic selection – Beyond the ‘cute response’. Society and Animals, 11(1), 83–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J. (1993). The psychology of group conflict and the dynamics of oppression: A social dominance perspective. In S. Iyengar, & W. McGuire (Eds.), Explorations in Political Psychology (pp. 183–219). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., van Laar, C., & Levin, S. (2004). Social dominance theory: Its agenda and method. Political Psychology, 25, 845–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, T. A., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanakanjana, N., & Saranet, S. (2007). Wildlife value orientations in Thailand: preliminary findings. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 12(5), 339–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teel, T. L., Dayer, A. A., Manfredo, M. J., & Bright, A. D. (2005). Regional results from the research project entitled “Wildlife Values in the West.” (Project Rep. No. 58). Project Report for the Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University, Human Dimensions in Natural Resources Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teel, T. L., Manfredo, M. J., & Stinchfield, H. S. (2005). The need and theoretical basis for exploring wildlife value orientations cross-culturally. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 12(5), 297–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teel, T. L., & Manfredo, M. J. (2007a). Exploring the predictive validity of the wildlife value orientation concept across a diverse set of wildlife-related issues. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teel, T. L. & Manfredo, M. J. (2007b). Understanding the diversity of public interests in wildlife conservation. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (2007). 2006 National survey of fishing, hunting, and wildlife- associated recreation: National overview. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaske, J. J., Shelby, L. B., & Manfredo, M. J. (2006). Bibliometric reflections on the first decade of Human Dimensions of Wildlife. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 11(2), 79–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vining, J. (2003). The connection to other animals and caring for nature. Human Ecology Review, 10(2), 87–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, C. M., Brown, B. B., & Altman, I. (1997). Environmental psychology. In J. Berry, M. H. Segal, & C. Kagitibasi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 3, Social Behavior and Applications, pp. 255–290). Boston: Allan and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L. (1967). The historical roots of our ecologic crisis. Science, 155, 1203–1207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky, A. B. (1991). The rise of radical egalitarianism. Washington, DC: The American University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, R. (Ed.). (1990). Signifying animals: Human meaning in the natural world. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinn, H. C., & Shen, X. S. (2007). Wildlife value orientations in China. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 12(5), 331–338.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J Manfredo .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Manfredo, M.J. (2008). Integrating Concepts: Demonstration of a Multilevel Model for Exploring the Rise of Mutualism Value Orientations in Post-industrial Society. In: Who Cares About Wildlife?. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77040-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics