Skip to main content

The Impacts of Policing Terrorism on Society: Lessons from Israel and the US

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
To Protect and To Serve

Abstract

The phenomenon of terror became widespread in the last decade, especially after 9-11 events and the attacks in Madred and London, emphasizing the severity of this threat to the western society and the challenge they bring on police-community relations. This chapter tries to address three major questions: first, what kinds of methods do the police use in order to reinforce public feelings of security, safety and legitimacy; second, to what extent do the public and the police work together to co-produce justice and address terrorism; and third, what are the public’s priorities in relation to the policing of terrorism?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Intelligence is the product of a process that includes collection (of information), evaluation, collation, analysis, and dissemination. Information (which is what we get from the public) should be considered raw data, and it is not considered intelligence until it has gone through the entire process.

References

  • U. Aas and G. Bana. 2002. The accused with not preventing the terror attack in Miron: It wasn’t in my hands. Haaretz Newspaper, 8 August: p. 1. [In Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • G.P. Alpert, R.G. Dunham, and M.R. Smith. 2007. Investigating racial profiling by the Miami-Dade police department: A multimethod approach. Criminology and Public Policy 6:25–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Belieck. 2006. Social capital, fear and police legitimacy: Measuring community-based policing in Albania. Journal of Security Sector Management 4(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Black. 2002. Violent Structures. In: The Workshop on Theories of Violence, 2002, 10 December. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Chalk and W. Rosenau. 2004. Confronting the “Enemy within”: Security Intelligence, the Police, and Counterterrorism in Four Democracies. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Clutterbuck. 2006. Countering Irish republican terrorism in Britain, its origin as a police function. Terrorism and Political Violence 18:95–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T.P. Connors and G. Pellegrini (eds). 2005. Hard Lessons Learned: Policing Terrorism in the United States. New York, NY: The Manhattan Institute for Policy Research

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Cromer. 2006. Analogies to terror: The construction of social problems in Israel during the Al-Aqsa intifada. Terrorism and Political Violence 18(3):389–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Eisenberg. 2007. Shopping malls another target of terrorism? Newsday.com, 13 Feb 13. www.newsday.com (accessed April 17, 2007).

  • Fact Sheet, the Massachusetts Local Law Enforcement Administrative Survey. Terrorism. 2002. Boston: Massachusetts Statistical Analysis Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Hamm. 2005. After September 11: Terrorism research and the crisis in criminology. Theoretical Criminology 9:237–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Harris. 2002. Profiles in Injustice: Why Racial Profiling Can’t Work. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Hasisi and R. Weitzer. 2007. Police relations with Arabs and Jews in Israel. The British Journal of Criminology 47(5):728–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N.J. Henderson, C.W. Ortiz, N.F. Sugie, and J. Miller. 2006. Law Enforcement and Arab American Community Relations after September 11th, 2001: Engagement in a Time of Uncertainty. US: Vera Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Hoffman. 1998. Inside Terrorism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Hoffman. 2003. The logic of suicide terrorism. The Atlantic Monthly, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICM Research Marketing Communication. 2005. Muslim Polls. http://www.icmresearch.co.uk (accessed April 20, 2007).

  • M. Innes. 2006. Policing uncertainty, countering terror through community intelligence and democratic policing. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 605:222–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A.L. Kamen. 2004. Will terror alert level show its true colours? The Washington Post, 13 October, A19.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Kaminski and W. Pelfrey. 2005. South Carolina Law Enforcement Census 2004. South Carolina: University of South Carolina, Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice, and the South Carolina Criminal Justice Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • G.R. Kerlikowske. 2006. Safe at home? Policing the hometown in the era of homeland security. In: Presentation at John Jay College of Criminal Justice, New York. November 2006. New York: John Jay College of Criminal Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Klerks. 1999. The network paradigm applied to criminal organizations: Theoretical nitpicking or a relevant doctrine for investigators? Recent developments in Nederland’s. Connections 24(3):53–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. LaFree. 2002. Conceptual and methodological challenges to the criminological study of terrorism. In: The Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, 14 November. Chicago: The American Society of Criminology.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Lum, L. Kennedy, and A. Sherley. 2006. Are counter-terrorism strategies effective? The results of the Campbell systematic review of counter-terrorism evaluation research. Journal of Experimental Criminology 2:489–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. Lyons. 1999. Partnership, information and public safety: Community policing in a times of terror. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management 25(3):530–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabat Daily News Television Report. 2002. Television program. Israel: Channel 1, July 31. [In Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • D.E. Marks. 2005. Policing and terrorism: The impact of 9/11 on the organizational structure of state and local police departments in the United States. MA Thesis, University of Delaware, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Merari. 1993. Terrorism as a strategy in insurgency. Terrorism and Political Violence 5(4):213–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • G.R. Murphy and M.R. Plotkin. 2003. Protecting Your Community from Terrorism: The Strategies for Local Law Enforcement Series. (Vol. 1) Improving Local-Federal Partnerships. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Centre for Disaster Preparedness. 2004. How Americans Feel about Terrorism and Security: Three Years after September 11th. Columbia: Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • W.M. Oliver. 2006. Homeland Security for Policing. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Perliger, A. Pedahzur, and Y. Zalmanovich. 2005. The defensive of the battle against terrorism. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 13(2):79–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Rosenfeld and B. Buchner. 2002. The unanticipated contributions of criminology to understanding terrorism. In: The Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, 14 November. Chicago: American Society of Criminology.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Rosenzweig. 2004. Civil liberties and the response to terrorism. Duquesne University Law Review 42:663–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.J. Sampson and S.W. Raudenbusch. 2004. Seeing disorder: Neighbourhood stigma and the social construction of “broken windows”. Social Psychology Quarterly 67:319–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. Skogan and K. Frydl (eds). 2004. Fairness and Effectiveness in Policing: The Evidence. Washington, DC: National Academies.

    Google Scholar 

  • E.L. Smith and M.R. Durose. 2006. Characteristics of Drivers Stopped by the Police, 2002. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Sobelman. 2002. The Taxi driver to his colleagues: Don’t drive Palestinians in your taxis. Haaretz Newspaper, 1 January, p. 2. [In Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Stuntz. 2002. Local policing after the terror. The Yale Law Journal 111:2137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Cost of Heightened Security in American Cities: A 192 City Survey. 2002. Washington, DC: US Conference of Mayors.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Traynor. 2006. Citizenship in a time of repression. Stetson Law Review 35:775–809.

    Google Scholar 

  • T.R. Tyler. 2006. Why People Obey the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Weisburd, T. Jonathan, and S. Perry. (Forthcoming). The Israeli model for policing terrorism: Goals, strategies, and open questions. Criminal Justice and Behavior: An International Journal.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Badi Hasisi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix 1

figure 3_7figure 3_7

Appendix 2

figure 4_7figure 4_7

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hasisi, B., Alpert, G.P., Flynn, D. (2009). The Impacts of Policing Terrorism on Society: Lessons from Israel and the US. In: Weisburd, D., Feucht, T., Hakimi, I., Mock, L., Perry, S. (eds) To Protect and To Serve. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73685-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics