Skip to main content

Complications of Liposuction

  • Chapter
Complications in Cutaneous Surgery

Abstract

In just a few decades since its first published description, the complication rates from liposuction have fallen considerably. Improvement in patient safety is largely due to the advent of tumescent liposuction, defined as liposuction performed solely using tumescent local anesthesia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ASPRS Task Force on Lipoplasty. 1997 survey summary report. Arlington Heights, IL: American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bruner JG, de Jong RH. Lipoplasty claims experience of U.S. insurance companies. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107:1285–1291.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dillerud E. Suction lipoplasty: a report on complications, undesired results, and patient satisfaction based on 3511 procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991;88:239–246.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Grazer FM, de Jong RH. Fatal outcomes from liposuction: census survey of cosmetic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;105:436–446.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hughes CE. Reduction of lipoplasty risks and mortality: an ASAPS survey. Aesthetic Surg J 2001;21:120–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jackson RF, Dolsky RL. Liposuction and patient safety. Am J Cosmet Surg 1999;16:21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Newman J, Dolsky RL. Evaluation of 5,458 cases of liposuction surgery. Am J Cosmet Surg 1984;1:25–80.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Teimourian B, Rogers WB. A national survey of complications associated with suction lipectomy: a comparative study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989;84:628–631.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Teimourian B. Complications associated with suction lipectomy. Clin Plast Surg 1989;16:385–394.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rao RB, Ely SF, Hoffman RS. Deaths related to liposuction. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1471–1475.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Coldiron B. Office surgical incidents: 19 months of Florida data. Dermatol Surg 2002;28:710–713.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Klein JA. The tumescent technique for liposuction. Am J Cosmet Surg 1987;4:263–267.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Klein JA. Tumescent technique for regional anesthesia permits lidocaine doses of 35 mg/kg for liposuction. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1990;16:248–263.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bernstein G, Hanke CW. Safety of liposuction: a review of 9478 cases performed by dermatologists. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1988;14:1112–1114.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Coleman WP, Hanke CW, Lillis P, Bernstein G, Narins R. Does the location of the surgery or the specialty of the physician affect malpractice claims in liposuction? Dermatol Surg 1999;25:343–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hanke CW, Bernstein G, Bullock S. Safety of tumescent liposuction in 15,336 patients. National survey results. Dermatol Surg 1995;21:459–462.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hanke W, Cox SE, Kuznets N, Coleman WP. Tumescent liposuction report performance measurement initiative: national survey results. Dermatol Surg 2004;30:967–978.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Housman TS, Lawrence N, Mellen BG, et al. The safety of liposuction: results of a national survey. Dermatol Surg 2002;28:971–978.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Coleman WP, Glogau RG, Klein JK, et al. Guidelines of care for liposuction. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001;45:438–447.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Drake LA, Ceilley RI, Cornelison RL, et al. Guidelines of care for liposuction. Committee on Guidelines of Care. J Am Acad Dermatol 1991;24:489–494.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lawrence N, Clark RE, Flynn TC, Coleman WP. American Society for Dermatologic Surgery guidelines of care for liposuction. Dermatol Surg 2000;26:265–269.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ilouz YG. The fat cell “graft”: a new technique to fill depressions. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986;78:122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Teimourian B. Repair of soft tissue contour deficit by means of semiliquid fat graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986;78:123.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gargon TJ, Courtiss EH. The risks of suction lipectomy: their prevention and treatment. Clin Plast Surg 1984;11:457.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Courtiss EH, Mathias B. Skin sensation after suction lipectomy: a prospective study of 50 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988;81:550.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sterling, J.B., Hanke, C.W. (2008). Complications of Liposuction. In: Gloster, H.M. (eds) Complications in Cutaneous Surgery. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73152-0_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73152-0_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-73151-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-73152-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics