A supply chain can be defined as “a system of suppliers, manufacturers, distributors, retailers, and consumers where materials flow downstream from suppliers to customers and information flows in both directions” (Geneshan et. al. 1998). The system is typically decentralized which implies that its participants are independent firms each with its own frequently conflicting goals spanning production, service, purchasing, inventory, transportation, marketing and other such functions. Due to these conflicting goals a decentralized supply chain is generally much less efficient than the corresponding centralized or integrated chain with a single decision maker. Efficiency suffers from both vertical (e.g., buyer-vendor competition) and horizontal (e.g., a number of vendors competing for the same buyer) conflicts of interest.
How to manage competition in supply chains is a challenging task which comprises a variety of problems. The overall target is to make, to the extent possible, the decentralized chain operate as efficiently as its benchmark, the corresponding centralized chain. This particular aspect of supply chain management is referred to as coordination. This chapter addresses simple static supply chain models, competition between supply chain members and their coordination.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Basar T, Olsder GJ (1999) Dynamic Noncooperative Game Theory, SEAM.
Bertrand J (1983) Theorie mathematique de la richesses sociale, Journal des Savants, September pp499-509, Paris.
Cachon G, Netessine S (2004) Game theory in Supply Chain Analysis in Handbook of Quantitative Supply Chain Analysis: Modeling in the eBusiness Era. edited by Simchi-Levi D, Wu SD, Shen Z-J, Kluwer.
Cournot AA (1987) Research into the mathematical principles of the theory of wealth, Mcmillan, New York.
Davidson C (1988) Multiunit Bargaining in Oligopolistic Industries. Journal of Labor Economics 6: 397-422.
Horn H, Wolinsky A (1988), Worker substitutability and patterns of unionisation, Economic Journal 98: 484-97.
Ganeshan RE, Magazine MJ, Stephens P (1998) A taxonomic review of supply chain management research, in Quantitative models for supply chain management, edited by Tayur SR.
Goyal SK, Gupta YP (1989) Integrated inventory models: the buyervendor coordination, European journal of operational research 41(33): 261-269.
Leng M, Parlar M (2005) Game Theoretic Applications in Supply Chain Management: A Review, INFOR 43(3): 187220.
Li L, Whang S (2001) Game theory models in operations management and information systems. In Game theory and business applications, K. Chatterjee and W.F. Samuelson, editors, Kluwer.
Ritchken P, Tapiero CS (1986) Contingent Claim Contracts and Inventory Control. Operations Research 34: 864-870.
Viehoff I (1987) Bargaining between a Monopoly and an Oligopoly. Discussion Papers in Economics 14, Nuffield College, Oxford University.
Wilcox J, Howell R, Kuzdrall P, Britney R (1987) Price quantity discounts: some implications for buyers and sellers. Journal of Marketing 51(3): 60-70.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2007). Supply chain games: modeling in a static framework. In: Supply Chain Games: Operations Management And Risk Valuation. International Series In Operations Research & Management Science, vol 113. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72776-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72776-9_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-72775-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-72776-9
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)