Abstract
Extensive signal processing occurs in sensory systems before perception of object positions. Normally this processing is cognitively opaque, inaccessible to experience or behavioral experiment. Several experimental techniques, however, allow analysis of relationships between unconscious processing and subsequent conscious perception and action. In the induced Roelofs effect, a visual target’s perceived position is biased by a large static frame that is offset from the center, an effect that appears in perceptual judgment but not in immediate motor activity. Delayed judgment and delayed pointing both show the effect. All four of these results are due to the frame capturing the straight-ahead, a bias that disappears after stimulus offset. The subject, however, is unaware of the bias, believing the straight-ahead (which affects orientation judgments) to remain accurate. Thus an unconscious bias changes conscious behavior. In a further experiment, inattentional blindness prevents perception of the frame. Nonetheless, the induced Roelofs effect appears. This phenomenon requires two dissociable and sequential unconscious steps, processing the frame and biasing the straight-ahead, before conscious responses are altered.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bridgeman, B., 1991, Complementary cognitive and motor image processing, in: Presbyopia research: From molecular biology to visual adaptation, G. Obrecht and L. Stark, eds.,. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 189–198.
Bridgeman, B., Gemmer, A., Forsman, T., and Huemer V., 2000, Processing spatial information in the sensorimotor branch of the visual system, Vision Res 40:3539–3552.
Bridgeman, B., Peery, S., and Anand, S., 1997, Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of visual space. Percept Psychophys 59:456–469.
Dassonville, P., Bridgeman, B., Bala, J., Thiem, P., and Sampanes, A.., 2003, The induced induced Roelofs effect: two visual systems or the shift of a single reference frame? Vision Res 44:603-611.
Diedrichsen, J., Werner, S., Schmidt, T., and Trommershäuser, J., 2004, Immediate spatial distortions of pointing movements induced by visual landmarks. Percept Psychophys 66:89-103.
Harris, C.S., 1974, Beware of the straight-ahead shift - nonperceptual change in experiments on adaptation to displaced vision. Perception 3:461-476.
Mack, A. & Rock, I., 1998. Inattentional blindness. MIT Press/Bradford Books series in cognitive psychology, Cambridge, MA.
Merikle, P.M., Joordens, S., and Stolz, J. A., 1995, Measuring the relative magnitude of unconscious influences. Conscious Cogn 4:422-439.
Mittelstaedt, H., 1999, The role of the otoliths in perception of the vertical and in path integration, in: Otolith function in spatial orientation and movement, B. Cohen and B. Hess, eds., Ann NY Acad Sci 871:334-344.
Rensink, R., 2004, Visual sensing without seeing. Psychol Sci 15:27-32.
Roelofs, C., 1935, Optische Lokalisation. Archiv für Augenheilkunde 109:395–415.
Van Essen, D. C, Anderson, C. H, and Felleman, D. J., 1992, Information processing in the primate visual system: An integrated systems perspective. Science 255:419-423.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bridgeman, B., Lathrop, B. (2007). Interactions Between Cognitive Space and Motor Activity. In: Mast, F., Jäncke, L. (eds) Spatial Processing in Navigation, Imagery and Perception. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71978-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71978-8_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-71977-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-71978-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)