Abstract
In Chap. 6, our aim was to gain some idea of the kinds of school-level characteristics that are most conducive to the implementation and integration of ICT-related pedagogical innovations. We found statistically significant associations between some of these characteristics and dimensions of innovativeness, indicating that contextual (ecological) factors influence the outcomes of innovation processes. However, pedagogical innovations also bring changes to the school ecology, and so can be viewed as processes that stimulate learning across the school as an organization. In this chapter, we look at how the innovation schools were nurturing innovative practices and thereby fostering (sustaining) themselves as learning organizations – as places where everybody in the organization learns and contributes to that learning. More particularly, we looked at whether and how the innovations differed in terms of the nature and focus of the organizational learning involved, as well as the mechanisms through which the organizational learning was being propagated.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Wenger (1998) refers to the organizational environments that foster teachers’ opportunities to learn new ideas and to try out new practices as “architectures for learning.”
- 2.
The five disciplines are systems thinking, personal mastery, mental models, shared vision, and team learning.
- 3.
The Dalton Plan is an educational concept aiming to achieve a balance between each child’s talents and the needs of the growing community, which embraces a three-part plan that continues to be the structural foundation of a Dalton education – the House, the Assignment, and the Laboratory (“Dalton Plan,” Wikipedia).
- 4.
In Greek mythology, the Argo was the ship on which Jason and the Argonauts sailed from Iolcus to retrieve the Golden Fleece.
References
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Cash, J. I., & McLeod, P. L. (1985). Managing the introduction of information systems technology in strategically dependent companies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 1(4), 5–23.
Crainer, S. (1998). Key management ideas (3rd ed.). London: Prentice Hall.
EMB (Education and Manpower Bureau HKSAR). (1998). Information technology for learning in a new era: Five-year strategy 1998/99 to 2002/03. Hong Kong. Retrieved from http://www.edb.gov.hk/FileManager/EN/Content_2309/five%20year%20strategy%2099%20to%2003.zip
Fiol, C. M., & Lyles, A. L. (1985). Organizational learning. The Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 803–813.
Fishman, B., Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2004). Creating a framework for research on systemic technology innovations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 43–76.
Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Goodman, J. (1994). External change agents and grassroots school reform: Reflections from the field. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 9(2), 113–135.
Hannan, A., English, S., & Silver, H. (1999). Why innovate? Some preliminary findings from a research project on “Innovations in teaching and learning in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 279–289.
Hendricks-Lee, M. S., Soled, S. W., & Yinger, R. J. (1995). Focus on research sustaining reform through teacher learning. Language Arts, 72(4), 288–292.
Hill, P., & Crévola, C. (2003). Organizational learning. In B. Davis & J. West-Burnham (Eds.), Handbook of educational leadership and management (pp. 394–403). London: Pearson Education.
Johnston, C., & Caldwell, B. (2001). Leadership and organisational learning in the quest for world class schools. The International Journal of Educational Management, 15(2), 94–101.
Karsten, S., Voncken, E., & Voorthuis, M. (2000). Dutch primary schools and concept of the learning organization. The Learning Organization, 7(3), 145–155.
Larsson, P., Löwstedt, J., & Shani, A. B. (2001). IT and the learning organization: Exploring the myths of change. Organizational Development Journal, 19(1), 73–91.
Leskes, A., Grogan, W. R., Canham, R. P., & O’Brien, J. (2003). Designing institutional change. Liberal Education, 89(1), 32–41.
Lorange, P. (1996). A business school as a learning organization. The Learning Organization, 3(5), 5–12.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 1017–1054.
Owston, R. D. (2003). School context, sustainability and transferability of innovation. In R. B. Kozma (Ed.), Technology, innovation and educational change: A global perspective (pp. 125–161). Eugene: International Society for Technology in Education.
Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and science of the learning organization. New York: Currency Doubleday.
Senge, P., Cambron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Smith, B., Dutton, J., & Kleiner, A. (2000). Schools that learn: A fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, parents, and everyone who cares about education. New York: Doubleday.
Senge, P., & Käufer, K. H. (2000). Communities of leaders or no leadership at all. In S. Chowdhury (Ed.), Management 21C (pp. 186–204). London: Prentice Hall.
Taylor, P. G. (1998). Institutional change in uncertain times: Lone ranging is not enough. Studies in Higher Education, 23(3), 269–279.
Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (Eds.). (1996). In action: Creating the learning organization. Alexandria: ASTD.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9(5), 1–5.
Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 807–840.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Law, N., Yuen, A., Fox, R. (2011). Organizational Learning in Innovation Schools. In: Educational Innovations Beyond Technology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71148-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71148-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-71137-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-71148-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)