Skip to main content

Political Violence as an Object of Study: The Need for Taxonomic Clarity

  • Chapter
Handbook of Politics

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Taxonomies are essential to science because they represent the way human minds work. As Pinker (2002: 203) notes, “intelligence depends on lumping together things that share properties, so that we are not flabbergasted by every new thing we encounter.” The bedrock of our sciences, and especially the social sciences, is neither methodology nor causal modeling, but rather taxonomy (or, more specifically, the construction of variables within a theory-driven schema), for both our methods and our models may produce deeply flawed conclusions if our theoretical objects are poorly constructed or specified. As Lenski (1994: 1–2) points out, “Comprehensive taxonomies that are grounded in careful observation — even when incomplete or incorrect in earlier formulations — provide both a foundation for the formulation of basic theory and a spur to innovative research.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Banks, A. 2008. Banks' Cross-National Time-Series Data Archive: Variables and Variable Locations. Binghamton: Databanks International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, C. 2008. “The Contribution of Social Movement Theory to Understanding Terrorism.” Sociological Compass 2: 1565–1581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooney, M and S. Phillips. 2002. “Typologizing Violence: A Blackian Perspective.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 22: 75–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drakos, K. and A. Gofas. 2006. “The Devil You Know but Are Afraid To Face: Underreporting Bias and its Distorting Effects on the Study of Terrorism.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 50: 714–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Europa World Yearbook. 2005. London, England: Europa Publications Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedom House. 2008. http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page = 1

  • Ganor, B. 2008. “Terrorist Organization Typologies and the Probability of a Boomerang Effect.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 31: 269–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, J. 2006. “A Theory of Categorical Terrorism.” Social Forces 84: 2027–2046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenski, G. 1994. “Societal Taxonomies: Mapping the Social Universe.” Annual Review of Sociology 20: 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, D. and D. Snow. 1996. Social Movements: Readings on Their Emergence, Mobilization and Dynamics. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mickolus, E., T. Sandler, J. M. Murdock, and P. A. Flemming. 2004. International Terrorism: Attributes of Terrorist Events (ITERATE) (07/27/04 version). Vineyard Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. 2002. The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature. New York: Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, D. C. 2004. “The Four Waves of Modern Terrorism.” Pp. 46–73. In A. K. Cronin and Ludes J. M. (eds.), Attacking Terrorism: Elements of a Grant Strategy. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambanis, N. 2004. “What is Civil War? Conceptual and Empirical Complexities of an Operational Definition.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 48: 814–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, A. P., and de Graaf, J. 1982. Violence as Communication: Insurgent Terrorism and the Western News Media. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. 1950. “The Fundamental Problems of Sociology.” In K. H. Wolff (ed.), The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. 2004. “Terror, Terrorism, Terrorists.” Sociological Theory 22: 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, R. 1999. BTSCS: A Binary Time-Series-Cross-Section Data Analysis Utility. Version 4.0.4. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.http://www.fas.harvard.edu/

    Google Scholar 

  • Weimann, G. and C. Winn. 1994. The Theater of Terror: Mass Media and International Terrorism. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2006. World Development Indicators 2006. New York: Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been made possible by a grant from the National Science Foundation (SES-0617980).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Crenshaw, E., Robison, K. (2010). Political Violence as an Object of Study: The Need for Taxonomic Clarity. In: Leicht, K.T., Jenkins, J.C. (eds) Handbook of Politics. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68930-2_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics