Skip to main content

On Visualization of OWL Ontologies

  • Chapter
Semantic Web

Abstract

Ontology visualization tools serve the expanding needs of knowledge engineering communities. A number of visualization frameworks for the standard ontology language OWL have already been developed. Considering information visualization in general, we propose the criteria of simplicity and completeness with which to gauge ontology visualization models. After analyzing existing OWL visualization frameworks we propose a simple visualization model for OWL-DL that is optimized according to our criteria. This visualization model is based around the underlying DL semantics of OWL ontologies; it circumvents the perplexities of RDF syntax. It has been implemented in GrOWL- graphical browser and editor for OWL ontologies. We discuss the usage of GrOWL in Ecosystem Services Database.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Klein M.C.A., Broekstra J., Fensel D., van Harmelen F., and Horrocks I. Ontologies and schema languages on the web. In Spinning the Semantic Web. MIT Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bechhofer S., van. Harmelen F., Hendler J., Horrocks I., McGuinness D.L., Patel Schneider P.F., and Stein L.A. OWL web ontology language reference M. Dean, and G. Schreiber (eds.) W3C Recommendation 10 February 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Horrocks I. DAML+OIL: a description logic for the semantic web. Bull. of the IEEE Computer Society Technical Committee on Data Engineering, March 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Horrocks I., Patel-Schneider P.F., and van Harmelen F. From SHIQ and RDF to OWL J. of Web Semantics, 1(1), 7–26, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Krivov S. and Villa F. In: Ludascher, B., Raschid, L. (Eds) Towards the paradigm of an ontology.based user interface: From simple knowledge maps to graphical query language. In: I Data Integration in Life Sciences, Springer Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics 3615, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Krivov S. GrOWL website URL: http://ecoinformatics.uvm.edu/dmaps/growl/, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Villa F., Wilson M.A., DeGroot R., Farber S., Costanza R., and Boumans R. Design of an integrated knowledge base to support ecosystem services valuation. Ecological Economics, 41, pages 445–456, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ecosystem Services Database URL: http://esd.uvm.edu.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Geroimenko V. and Chen C, Eds., Visualizing the Semantic Web, Springer, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chen C. Information visualization versus the semantic web. In: Visualizing the Semantic Web; Springer Verlag London, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Heer J., Card S.K., and Landay J.A. Prefuse: a toolkit for interactive information visualization. In CHI.05: Proceeding of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Portland, Oregon, USA, 421–430, New York, NY, USA. ACM Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goguen J. and Harrell D.F., Information visualization and semiotic morphisms, http://www-cse.ucsd.edu/users/goguen/papers/sm/vzln.html 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Costello R.L. and Jacobs D.B., Camera ontology website: http://www.xfront.com/camera/index.htm, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Horrocks I. and Patel-Schneider P. Reducing owl entailment to description logic satis.ability. In Proc. International SemanticWeb Conference, 17–29. Springer-Verlag, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grosso W.E., Eriksson H., Fergerson R.W., Gennari J.H., Tu S.W., and Musen M.A. Knowledge modelling at the millenium (the design and evolution of prott,egt,e-2000). In Proceedings of Knowledge Acqusition Workshop (KAW.99), 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  16. OWL Viz OWL Viz, URL, http://www.co-ode.org/downloads/owlviz/.

    Google Scholar 

  17. EzOWL EzOWL URL: http://iweb.etri.re.kr/ezowl/index.html.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Liebig T. and Noppens O. Track Fast browsing and easy editing of large ontologies. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Evaluation of Ontology-Based Tools, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  19. IsaViz: A visual authoring tool for RDF URL: http://www.w3.org/2001/11/IsaViz/, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  20. RDF gravity (RDF graph visualization tool) URL: http://semweb.salzburgresearch.at/apps/rdf-gravity/.

    Google Scholar 

  21. VisioOWL URL: http://web.tampabay.rr.eom/.ynn/VisioOWL/VisioOWL.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  22. O. M. Group, Ontology definition metamodel-request for proposal. URL: http://www.omg.org/docs/ontology/03-03-01.rtf, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Brockmans S., Volz R. Eberhart A., and Löer P. Visual modeling of OWL DL ontologies using UML. In 3rd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2004), Hiroshima, Japan, 7–11 Nov. 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Brachman R.J. On the epistemological status of semantic networks. In Associative Networks: Representation and Use of Knowledge by Computers, N. V. Findler, Ed.; Academic Press, Orlando, 3–50, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gaines B.R. An interactive visual language for term subsumption languages. In J. Mylopoulos and R. Reiter, Editors, Proc. Of 12th Int. Joint Conf. On Art. Int., Sydney, Australia, Morgan Kaufrnann., pages 817–823, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sowa J.F., Conceptual graphs summary. In: Conceptual Structures: Current Research and Practice, (T.E. Nagle, J. A. Nagle, L.L. Gerholz, P.W. Eklund, Eds.). Ellis Horwood, New York 3–51, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sowa J. Conceptual structures: Information processing in mind and machine, The Systems Programming Series, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Patel-Schneider P.F., Hayes P., and Horrocks I. OWL web ontology language semantics and abstract syntax, W3C recommendation URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ludäscher B., Gupta A., and Martone M.E. Model-based mediation with domain maps. In 17th Intl. Conf. on Data Engineering ICDE, Heidelberg, Germany, 2001. IEEE Computer Society, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Costanza R., Arge R.D., DeGroot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., Limburg K., Naeem S., Neill R.O., Paruelo J., Raskin R., Sutton, P., and VanDenBelt M. The value of the world.s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 254–260, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. SEEK-Science Environment for Ecological Knowledge URL: http://seek.ecoinformatics.org.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Krivov, S., Villa, F., Williams, R., Wu, X. (2007). On Visualization of OWL Ontologies. In: Baker, C.J.O., Cheung, KH. (eds) Semantic Web. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-48438-9_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics