Skip to main content

Choosing a Combinatorial Auction Design: An Illustrated Example

  • Chapter
Perspectives in Operations Research

Part of the book series: Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series ((ORCS,volume 36))

Summary

This paper summarizes a talk given in honor of Saul Gass’ 80th Birthday celebration. The paper is modeled after Saul’s well-known book, An Illustrated Guide to Linear Programming, and presents some of the illustrations provided during that talk. In this paper, we explain why specific rules might be chosen within a general combinatorial auction framework. The purpose of such rules is to assure that the market mechanism is fair to both buyers and sellers, and so that the auction will end in an efficient outcome, i.e., the goods are won by those that value them the most. The paper describes some of the issues, both computational and economic, that one faces when designing such auctions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Lawrence M. Ausubel, Peter Cramton, and Paul Milgrom. The Clock Proxy Auction, in Combinatorial Auctions, Cramton, Peter, Yoav Shoham and Richard Steinberg, eds., MIT Press, 113–136, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lawrence M. Ausubel and Paul Milgrom. Ascending Auctions with Package Bidding. Frontiers of Theoretical Economics 1: 1–42, 2002.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Craig Boutilier and Hoger H. Hoos. Bidding Languages for Combinatorial Auctions. Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IICAI-01): 1211–1217, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Craig Boutilier, Tuomas Sandholm, and Rob Shields. Eliciting Bid Taker Non-Price Preferences in Combinatorial Auctions. Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, V. Khu-Smith and C.J. Mitchell, eds., San Jose, CA, 204–211, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Peter Cramton. Simultaneous Ascending Auctions, in Combinatorial Auctions, Cramton, Peter, Yoav Shoham and Richard Steinberg, eds., MIT Press, 99–114,2005.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Peter Cramton, Yoav Shoham and Richard Steinberg. Combinatorial Auctions. MIT Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cybernomics. An experimental comparison of the simultaneous multiple round auction and the CRA combinatorial auction. Discussion paper. Report to the Federal Communications Commission. 2000. Available at: http://wireless.fcc.eov/auctions/conferertces/combin2Q00/releases/98540191.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  8. Robert Day and S. Raghavan. Assignment Preferences and Combinatorial Auctions. working paper, Operations and Information Management School of Business, University of Connecticut., 2005. Available at: http://users. business. uconn. edu/bday/index.html

    Google Scholar 

  9. Melissa Dunford, Karla Hoffman, Dinesh Menon, Rudy Sultana, and Thomas Wilson. Price Estimates in Ascending Combinatorial Auctions. Technical Report, George Mason University, Systems Engineering and Operations Research Department, Fairfax, VA, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wedad Elmaghraby and Pinar Keskinocak. Combinatorial Auctions in Procurement, The Practice of Supply Chain Management, C. Billington, T. Harrison, H. Lee, J. Neale (editors), Kluwer Academic Publishers. 2003

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yuz Fujishima, Kevin Leyton-Brown, and Yoav Shoham. Taming the Computational Complexity of Combinatorial Auctions: Optimal and Approximate Approaches. Proceedings of IJCAI 1999 548–553, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Paul Klemperer, What Really Matters in Auction Design. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16: 169–189, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Anthony M. Kwasnica, John O. Ledyard, David Porter, and Christine DeMartini. A New and Improved Design for Multi-object Iterative Auctions. Management Science, 51: 419–4234, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. John O. Ledyard, Mark Olson, David Porter, Joseph A. Swanson and David P. Torma. The First Use of a Combined Value Auction for Transportation Services. Interfaces. 32: 4–12, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kevin Leyton-Brown, Eugene Nudelman, and Yoav Shoham. Empirical Hardness Models, in Combinatorial Auctions, Cramton, Peter, Yoav Shoham and Richard Steinberg, eds., MIT Press, 479–503, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  16. John McMillan. Reinventing the Bazaar: A Natural History of Markets. Norton Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Paul Milgrom. Putting Auction Theory to Work. Cambridge Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Noam Nisan. Bidding and Allocation in Combinatorial Auctions. Proceedings of the 2 nd ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, 1–12, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  19. David C. Parkes. Auction Design with Costly Preference Elicitation. Annals of Mathematics and AI, 44: 269–302, 2005.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. David C. Parkes and Lyle H. Ungar. Iterative Combinatorial Auctions: Theory and Practice. Proceedings of the 17 th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-00), 74–81, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Steve J. Rassenti, Vernon I. Smith and Robert I. Bulfin. A Combinatorial Mechanism for Airport Time Slot Allocation. Bell Journal of Economics, 13:402–417, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hoffman, K. (2006). Choosing a Combinatorial Auction Design: An Illustrated Example. In: Alt, F.B., Fu, M.C., Golden, B.L. (eds) Perspectives in Operations Research. Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series, vol 36. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-39934-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics