Abstract
Psychologists studying the psychological issues inherent in police interrogation techniques have much to learn from the road traveled by psychologists who generated and helped integrate into policy the research on eyewitness evidence. As nearly all readers of this volume are likely to know, research on eyewitness evidence began in the mid-1970s and captured the intrigue of many legal research psychologists into the 1980s and 1990s. During this time, psychologists conducted numerous studies about the ability of people to accurately recall and report details about a witnessed event and to identify a witnessed perpetrator from a lineup. This research helped identify factors affecting eyewitness reliability over which the justice system has no control (so-called estimator variables such as length of exposure), as well as factors over which the justice system does have control (e.g., system variables such as lineup procedures) (Wells, 1978). The studies—many relying on sophisticated experimental methods and materials—were able to examine the effect of these factors on the accuracy of eyewitness memory and identification (Cutler & Penrod; Wells et al., 2000). Wells and his colleagues (2000) detailed the journey of psychologists in helping to translate this body of research on eyewitness identification into policy, and it is wisdom from that experience on which much of the current chapter is premised.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ad Hoc Committee on Legal Issues, American Psychological Association. (June, 1983). Factors affecting APA involvement in litigation. (Available from the Office of General Counsel, American Psychological Association, 750 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 200024242).
American Psychological Association. (December 1996, amended June 2003 ). Procedures for submission of amicus curiae briefs. ( Available from the Office of General Counsel, American Psychological Association, 750 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20002–4242 ).
Burger, J.M., & Cooper, H.M. (1979). The desirability of control. Motivation and Emotion, 3, 381–393.
Carver, C. S., & Scheir, M. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control-theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Carver, C. S., & Scheir, M. F. (1983). Two sides of the self: One for you and one for me. In J. Suls & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 2, 123–157 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Connors, E., Lundregan, T., Miller, N., & McEwen, T. (1996). Convicted by juries, exonerated by science: Case studies in the use of DNA evidence to establish innocence after trial. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
Cutler, B. L., & Penrod, S. D. (1995). Mistaken identification: The eyewitness, psychology, and the law. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc, 509 U.S. 579 (1993).
DePaulo, B. M., & Friedman, H. S. (1998). Nonverbal communication. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 3–40 ). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Diener, E. (1979). Deindividuation, self-awareness, and disinhibition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1160–1171.
Diener, E. (1980). Deindividuation: The absence of self-awareness, and self regulation in group members. In D. Paulus (Ed.), The psychology of group influence ( 209–242 ). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Ekman, P., & O’Sullivan, M. (1991). Who can catch a liar? American Psychologist, 46, 913–920.
Gudjonsson, G.H. (1984). A new scale of interrogative suggestibility. Personality and individual differences, 5, 303–314.
Gudjonsson, G.H. (1991). Suggestibility and compliance among alleged false confessors and resistors in criminal trials. Medicine, Science, and the Law, 31, 147–151.
Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions: A handbook. West Sussex, England: Wiley.
Grisso, T. (1981). Juvenile’s waiver of rights: Legal and psychological competence. New York: Plenum.
Inbau, F. E., Reid, J. E., Buckley, J. P., & Jayne, B. C. (2001). Criminal interrogations and confessions ( 4th ed. ). Gaithersberg, MD: Aspen.
Jones, E. E. (1990). Interpersonal perception. New York: Macmillan.
Kassin, S. M. (1997). The psychology of confession evidence. American Psychologist, 52, 221–233.
Kassin, S. M., Goldstein, C. J., & Savitsky, K. (2003). Behavioral confirmation in the interrogation room: On the dangers of presuming guilt. Law and Human Behavior. 27, 187–203.
Kassin, S. M., & Kiechel, K. L. (1996). The social psychology of false confessions: Compliance, internalization, and confabulation. Psychological Science, 7, 125–128.
Kassin, S. M., & McNall, K. (1991). Police interrogations and confessions: Communicating promises and threats by pragmatic implication. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 233–252.
Kassin, S. M., & Sukel, H. (1997). Coerced confession and the jury: An experimental test of the “harmless error” rule. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 27–46.
Kassin, S. M., & Wrightman, L. S. (1980). Prior confessions and mock juror verdicts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10, 133–149.
Kassin, S. M., & Wrightman, L. S. (1981). Coerced confessions, judicial instruction, and mock juror verdicts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11, 489–506.
Konecni, V.J., & Ebbson, E.B., (1986). Courtroom testimony by psychologists on eyewitness identification issues. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 117–126.
Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098–2109.
McCloskey, M. E., & Egeth, H. E. (1983). Eyewitness identification: What can a psychologist tell a jury? American Psychologist, 38, 550–563.
Muaysterberg, H. (1908). On the witness stand: Essays on psychology and crime. New York: Doubleday.
Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., Sr Gibbons, F. X. (1979). Self-directed attention, awareness of bodily states, and suggestibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1576–1588.
Snyder, M. (1979). Self-monitoring processes. ht L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 85–128 ). New York: Academic Press.
Wells, G. L. (1978). Applied eyewitness-testimony research: System-variables and estimator variables. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1546–1557.
Wells, G. L., Small, M., Penrod, S. Malpass, R. S., Fulero, S. M., & Brimacombe, C.A.E. (1998). Eyewitness identification procedures: Recommendations for lineups and photospreads. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 603–647.
Wells, G. L., Malpass, R. S., Lindsay, R. C. L., Fisher, R. P., Turtle, J. W., & Fulero, S. M. (2000). From the lab to the police station: A successful application of eyewitness research. American Psychologist, 55, 581–598.
Wicklund, R. A. (1980). Group contact and self-focused attention. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), The psychology of group influence ( 189–208 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Williams, K. D., Loftus, E. F., & Deffenbacher, K. A. (1992). Eyewitness evidence and testimony. In D.K. Kagehiro & W.S. Laufer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology and law (pp. 141–166 ). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Wood, J. M., Billings, J. Taylor, R. Corey, D. Burns, J., & Garven, S. (2000, June). Guilty knowledge and false confessions regarding a staged theft: Effects of reinforcement on children’s admissions. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Miami, Florida.
Wrightsman, L. S., & Kassin, S. M. (1993). Confessions in the courtroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zanna, M. P., & Olson, J. M. (1982). Individual differences in attitudinal relations. In M. Zanna, E.T. Higgins, & C.P. Herman (Eds.), Consistency in social behavior: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 2, pp. 75–103 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 1–59.
Zuckerman, M., Koestner, R., & Alton, A. O. (1984). Learning to detect deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 519–528.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wiggins, E.C., Wheatman, S.R. (2004). So What’s a Concerned Psychologist to Do?. In: Lassiter, G.D. (eds) Interrogations, Confessions, and Entrapment. Perspectives in Law & Psychology, vol 20. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-38598-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-38598-3_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-33151-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-38598-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive