Abstract
This empirical paper shows how free/libre open source software (FLOSS) contributes to mutual and collaborative learning in an educational environment. However, unlike proprietary software, FLOSS allows extensive customisation of software and supports the needs of local users better. In this paper, we observes how implementing FLOSS in an Italian high school challenges the conventional relationship between end users themselves (e.g. teachers and students) and that between users and developers. The findings will shed some light on the social aspects of FLOSS-based computerization -- including the roles of FLOSS in social and organizational change in educational environments and the ways that the social organization of FLOSS are influenced by social forces and social practices.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
References
A. Bruckman, Co-evolution of technological design and pedagogy in an online learning community. In Designing Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning edited by Sasha Barab, Rob Kling, and James Gray. Cambridge University Press (2003).
C. DiBona, S. Ockman, and M. Stone, (Eds.) Open Sources: Voicesfrom the Open Source Revolution (O’Reilly UK, 1999).
M. Dougiamas, Developing tools to foster online educational dialogue. In K. Martin, N. Stanley and N. Davison (Eds), Teaching in the Disciplines/Learning in Context, 119–123. Proceedings of the 8th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, The University of Western Australia, February 1999. Perth: UWA. http://lsn.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf1999/dougiamas.html (1999).
M. Dougiamas, and P. C. Taylor, Moodle: Using Learning Communities to Create an Open Source Course Management System. Proceedings of the EDMEDIA 2003 Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii (2003).
J. Fleck, Configurations: crystallizing contingency, International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing, 3(1), 15–36 (1993).
J. Fleck, Learning by trying: the implementation of configurational technology’, Research Policy, 23, 637–652 (1994).
R. Fox, What are the shortcomings inherent in the non-problematic perception of new technologies? In Black, B. and Stanley, N. (Eds), Teaching and Learning in Changing Times, 96–101, Proceedings of the 7th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, The University of Western Australia, February 1998. Perth: UWA (1998).
M-L Gomez, I. Bouty, and C. Drucker-Godard, Developing knowing in practice: behind the scenes of haute cuisine. In Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach edited by Davide Nicolini, Silvia Gherardi and Dvora Yanow (London: M. E. Sharpe, Inc.,2003).
C. Hine, Ideas of audience in World Wide Web design: the meaning of a mouse click. Information, Communication and Society 4(2): 182–198 (2001).
C. Hine, Cyberscience: and social boundaries: the implications of laboratory talk on the Internet. Sociological Research Online. 7(2) http://www.socresonline.org.uk/7/2/hine.html (2002).
M. H. Huysman, and D. de Wit, Knowledge sharing in practice (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002).
J. Lave, and E. Wenger E. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
D. R. Millen and M. J. Muller, Computer-Supported Communities of Practice, paper presented at the 2nd ECSCW Workshop on Community Knowledge, 16–20 September 2001, Bonn, Germany (2001).
E. J. Pearson and A. J. Koppi, A WebCT Course on Making Accessible Online Courses, WebCT Asia-Pacific Conference, Melbourne, Australia, March 2002 (2002).
B. Perens, The open source definition. In Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution, Chris DiBona, Sam Ockman, and Mark Stone (Eds). (O’Reilly UK, 1999).
C. Shirky, Situated software, firstly published March 30, 2004 on the ‘Networks, Economics, and Culture’ mailing list. Available online at http://www.shirky.com/writings/situated_software.html (2004).
S. L. Star, The structure of ill-structured solutions: boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In Gasser, L. & Huhns, M. (eds.) Distributed artiJicial intelligence, vol. 2 (London: Pitman, 1989), pp. 37–54.
A. Strauss, Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists (Cambridge University Press, 1987).
R. K. Yin, Case Study Research, Design and Methods, 3rd ed. (Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 2002).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lin, Y., Zini, E. (2006). An Empirical Study on Implementing Free/Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS) in Schools. In: Berleur, J., Nurminen, M.I., Impagliazzo, J. (eds) Social Informatics: An Information Society for all? In Remembrance of Rob Kling. HCC 2006. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, vol 223. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-37876-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-37876-3_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-37875-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-37876-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)