Skip to main content

The Clinical Research Process: Building a System in Harmony with its Users

  • Chapter
Cancer Clinical Trials: Proactive Strategies

Part of the book series: Cancer Treatment and Research ((CTAR,volume 132))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bodenheimer, T. Uneasy Alliance—Clinical Investigators and the Pharmaceutical Industry. N. Eng. J. Med., 2000; 342: 1539–1544. Available online at http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/342/20/1539

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Campbell, E., Koski, G., Zinner, D., and Blumenthal, D. Managing the Triple Helix in the Life Sciences. Issues in Science and Technology, Winter, 2005; 1: 32–39. National Academies Press, Washington, DC. Available online at http://www.issues.Org/21.2/campbell.html.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Christian, M., Goldberg, J., Killen, J., Abrams, J., McCabe, M., Mauer, J., and Wittes, R. A central institutional review board for multi-institutional trials. N. Eng. J. Med. 2002; 346: 1405–1408. Available online at http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/346/18/1405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gatter, R. Walking the Talk of Trust in Human Subjects Research: the Challenge of Regulating Financial Conflicts of Interest. Emory Law Journal, 2003; 52: 327–402.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Giles, J. Researchers break the rules in frustration at review boards. Nature, 2005; 438:136–137. Available online at http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v438/n7065/full/438136b.html

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Koski, G. Research, Regulations and Responsibility: Confronting the Compliance Myth. Emory Law Journal, 2003; 52: 403–416

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Koski, G., Aungst, J., Kupersmith, J., Getz, K., and Rimoin, D. Enhancing Safety and Efficiency in Clinical Research: Cooperative Research Ethics Review Boards—A Win-Win Solution? IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 2005; 27: 1–7. Available online at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/505154_print.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Martinson, B., Anderson, M., and de Vries, R. Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 2005; 435: 737–738. Available online at http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v435/n7043/full/435737a.html

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Koski, G. (2007). The Clinical Research Process: Building a System in Harmony with its Users. In: Leong, S.P.L. (eds) Cancer Clinical Trials: Proactive Strategies. Cancer Treatment and Research, vol 132. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-33225-3_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-33225-3_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-33224-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-33225-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics