Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Community Processes: Coordination

  • Chapter
Handbook of Disaster Research

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

In your mind’s eye picture the pyramids of Egypt or Peru. For they, like the darker side of human activity—think of the thousands involved in Alexander’s military movements— reflect the social process labeled coordination. And while your mind is soaring, picture those magnificent structures that defined the skyline of Manhattan prior to September 11, 2001. In contrast to the macro systems of finance, engineering, and architecture that were integrated to create those structures, think of the coordination among those few who brought them down. Then, even before the toxic dust settled, scores of additional professionals sought to coordinate their activities so as to limit the death, injury, and physical destruction beyond that which had occurred. These considerations establish the context, importance, and relevance of this chapter.

I wish to thank Ruth Ann Drabek for her work on this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Belardo, S., Karwan, K.R., & Wallace, W.A. (1984). Managing the response to disasters using microcomputers. Interfaces, 14, 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennings, J.M. (1981). Strategically interdependent organizations. In P.C. Nystrom & W.H. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of organizational design: Adapting organizations to their environments (pp. 433–455). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granot, H. (1997). Emergency inter-organizational relationships. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 6, 305–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dynes, R.R. (1970). Organized behavior in disaster. Lexington, MA: Heath Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, T.J. (1994). The role of EOCs in emergency management: A comparison of American and Canadian experience. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 12, 51–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mileti, D. (1999). Disasters by design: A reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, R.L., Rose, S.M., & Bergunder, A.F. (1974). The structure of urban reform: Community decision organizations in stability and change. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, T.R. (1978). Group emergence in disasters. In E.L. Quarantelli (Ed.), Disasters: Theory and research (pp. 106–125). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, G.O., Sorensen, J.H., Long, J.F., Jr., & Fisher, D. (1989). Emergency planning for chemical agent releases. The Environmental Professional, 11, 396–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dynes, R.R., & Aguirre, B.E. (1979). Organizational adaptation to crises: Mechanisms of coordination and structural change. Disasters, 3, 71–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B.A. (1994). Flexibility and improvisation in emergency response. Disaster Management, 6, 84–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoetmer, G.J. (1991). Introduction. In G.J. Hoetmer & T.E. Drabek (Eds.), Emergency management: principles and practice for local government (pp. xvii–xxxiv). Washington, DC: International City Management Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, D., & Plastrik, P. (1998). Banishing bureaucracy: The five strategies for reinventing government. New York: Plume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S.K. (1998). Reinventing public administration: A case study of the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Public Administration Quarterly, 22, 35–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, D.M., & Howard, G. A. (2001). Issues in the profession: The evolving role of the emergency manager. The Journal of the American Society of Professional Emergency Planners, 8, 63–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. (1981). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quarantelli, E.L. (1998b). Epilogue: Where we have been and where we might go. In E.L. Quarantelli (Ed.), What is a disaster: Perspective on the question (pp. 234–273). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddell, E. (1983). Coping with frosts, governments and disaster experts: Some reflections based on a New Guinea experience and a perusal of the relevant literature. In K. Hewitt (Ed.), Interpretations of calamity (pp. 33–43). Boston: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Tocqueville, A. (1947). Democracy in America. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, D.A., Whetten, D.A. and Associates. (1982). Interorganizational coordination: Theory, research and implementation. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, P. (2002). Images of terror. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, L.M., Bivans, C.J., & Steel, D.L. (1989). The impact of intergovernmental distance on disaster communications. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 7, 116–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, R.W. (1982). The social psychology of civil defense. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedel, K.R., & Baker, D.R. (1998). After the Oklahoma City bombing: A case study of the resource coordination committee. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 16, 333–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, G.F. (1945). Human adjustment to floods: A geographical approach to the flood problems in the United States. Research Paper No. 29. Chicago: Department of Geography, The University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, R.W., Lindell, M.K., & Greene, M.R. (1982). Threat perception and public response to volcano hazard. The Journal of Social Psychology, 116, 199–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drabek, T.E. (2003a). Strategies for coordinating disaster responses. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, B. (1999). Terrorism trends and prospects. In I.O. Lesser, B. Hoffman, J. Arquilla, D. Ronfeldt, & M. Zanini (Eds.), Countering the new terrorism (pp. 7–38). With a Foreword by Brian Michael Jenkins. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waugh, W.L., Jr. (2000b). Terrorism and emergency management: Instructor guide. Emmitsburg, MD: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Management Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, E.J. (1981). Resource mobilization and citizen protest in communities around three mile island. Social Problems, 29, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, J. (2002). The implementation of the incident control system in NSW: Span of control and management by objectives. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 17(3), 8–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, P.J. (1985). Recovering from catastrophes: Federal disaster relief policy and politics. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drabek, T.E. (2004). Social dimensions of disaster (2nd ed.). Emmitsburg, MD: Emergency Management Institute, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, G.O., Sorensen, J.H., & Morell, J.A. (1991). Using information systems in emergency management. Advances in the Implementation and Impact of Computer Systems, 1, 161–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J.D., & Hawkes, R.W. (1962). Disaster organization and administrative process. In G.W. Baker & D.W. Chapman (Eds.), Man and society in disaster (pp. 268–300). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, D.F. (1991). Coordinating community resources. In T.E. Drabek & G.J. Hoetmer (Eds.), Emergency management: Principles and practice for local government (pp. 55–78). Washington, DC: International City Management Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petak, W.J. (1984). Natural hazard mitigation: Professionalization of the policy making process. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 2, 285–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEntire, D.A. (2003). Causation of catastrophe: lessons from hurricane Georges. Journal of Emergency Management, 1(2), 22–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallings, R.A. (1995). Promoting risk: Constructing the earthquake threat. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennell, G. (2002). An alternative to the incident cgommand system. Contingency Planning & Management, 7(1), 35–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindell, M.K. (1994). Are local emergency planning committees effective in developing community disaster preparedness? International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 12, 159–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1938). Logic, the nature of inquiry. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, T.J. (1995). Federalism and Canadian emergency response: Control, co–operation and conflict. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 10(1), 18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, P.J., & Williams, W. (1986). Disaster policy implementation: Managing programs under shared governance. New York and London: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godschalk, D.R., Beatley, T., Berke, P., Brower, D., & Kaiser, E. (1998). Making mitigation work: Recasting natural hazard planning and implementation. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal, D.M. (1997). Reconsidering the phases of disaster. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 15(2), 239–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, R.L. (1959). Vertical and horizontal communication in formal organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 4, 188–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drabek, T.E. (1990). Emergency management: Strategies for maintaining organizational integrity. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, C.E. (1961b). Disaster and community therapy. Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, K.J. (1985). Emergency medical preparedness and response in disasters: The need for interorganizational coordination. Public Administration Review, 45, 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, J.H., Mileti, D.S., & Copenhaver, E. (1985). Inter and intraorganizational cohesion in emergencies. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 3, 27–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, K.J. (1994). Research overview: Emergency response. In P. Vaziri (Compiler), Proceedings of the NEHRP conference and workshop on the Northridge earthquake of January 17, 1994—Volume IV: Social science and emergency management (pp. IV-9–IV-15). Richmond, CA: California Universities for Research in Earthquake Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dynes, R.R. (1994). Community emergency planning: False assumptions and inappropriate analogies. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 12(2), 141–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quarantelli, E.L. (1960). Images of withdrawal behavior in disasters: Some basic misconceptions. Social Problems, 8, 68–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylves, R., & Cumming, W.R. (2004). FEMA’s path to homeland security. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management: 1979–2003, 1(11), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, H.E., Bates, F.L., Layman, M.V., & Parenton, V.J. (1963). Before the wind: A study of response to Hurricane Carla. National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council Disaster Study No. 19. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drabek, T.E. (1968). Disaster in aisle 13. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallings, R.A., & Quarantelli, E.L. (1985). Emergent citizen groups and emergency management. Public Administration Review, 45, 93–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hage, J., & Aiken, M. (1970). Social change in complex organizations. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drabek, T.E. (1985). Managing the emergency response. Public Administration Review, 45, 85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dynes, R.R., DeMarchi, B., & Pelanda, C. (Eds.). (1987). Sociology of disasters: Contributions of sociology to disaster research. Milan, Italy: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dynes, R.R. (1983). Problems in emergency planning. Energy, 8, 653–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dynes, R.R, Quarantelli, E.L., & Kreps, G.A. (1972). A perspective on disaster planning. Columbus, OH: Disaster Research Center, The Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolensky, R.P., & Miller, E.J. (1981). The everyday versus the disaster role of local officials—citizen and official definitions. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 16, 483–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller, J.M., & Quarantelli, E.L. (1973). Neglected characteristics of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 75, 665–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drabek, T.E. (1986). Human system responses to disaster: An inventory of sociological findings. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, R.W., & Lindell, M.K. (2003). Understanding citizen response to disasters with implications for terrorism. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 11, 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, R., & Anderson, P.S. (1997). Disasters and the information technology revolution. Disasters: The Journal of Disaster Studies, Policy and Management, 21, 305–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dash, N. (2002). The use of geographic information systems in disaster research. In R. A. Stallings (Ed.), Methods of disaster research (pp. 320–333). Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Xlibris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallings, R.A. (1988). Conflict in natural disasters: A codification of consensus and conflict theories. Social Science Quarterly, 69, 569–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R.M. (1970) American society: A sociological interpretation. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, G.A. (1990). The federal emergency management system in the United States: A research assessment. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 8, 275–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent, R.C. (1987). Anatomy of disaster relief: The international network in action. London: Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal, D.M., & Phillips, B.D. (1995). Effective emergency management: Reconsidering the bureaucratic approach. Disasters: The Journal of Disaster Studies, Policy and Management, 19, 327–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dynes, R.R. (1987). The concept of role in disaster research. In R.R. Dynes, B. De Marche, & C. Pelanda (Eds.), Sociology of disasters: Contributions of sociology to disaster research (pp. 71–103). Milano, Italy: Franco Angelo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, R.W. (1991). Managing response operations. In T. E. Drabek & G. J. Hoetmer (Eds.), Emergency management: Principles and practice for local government (pp. 201–223). Washington, DC: International City Management Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, R.A. (1956). The Rio Grande flood: A comparative study of border communities. National Research Disaster Study No. 7. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R.H. (1987). Organizations: Structures, processes, and outcomes. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enarson, E., Childers, C., Morrow, B.H., Thomas, D., & Wisner, B. (2003). A social vulnerability approach to disasters. Emmitsburg, MD: Emergency Management Institute, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulford, C.L., Klonglan, G.E., & Kopachevsky, J.P. (1973). Securing community resources for social action. Ames, IA: Iowa State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddow, G.D., & Bullock, J.A. (2003). Introduction to emergency management. Amsterdam: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulford, C.L., & Mulford, M.A. (1977). Community and interorganizational perspectives on cooperation and conflict. Rural Sociology, 42, 569–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benini, J.B. (1998). Getting organized pays off for disaster response. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 6, 61–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auf der Heide, E. (1989a). Disaster response: Principles of preparation and coordination. St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouzmin, A., Jarman, A.M.G., & Rosenthal, U. (1995). Interorganizational policy processes in disaster management. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 4, 20–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, R.W. (2003). Municipal terrorism management in the United States. Disaster Prevention and Management, 12(3), 190–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruntfest, E., & Weber, M. (1998). Internet and emergency management: Prospects for the future. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 16, 55–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J.D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, M. (1999). Disaster preparedness: An analysis of public safety agency and community preparedness during the Northridge earthquake. International Journal of Public Administration, 22, 679–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burby, R.J. (2000). Land-use planning for flood hazard reduction. In D.J. Parker (Ed.), Floods (pp. 6–18). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quarantelli, E.L. (1985). Realities and mythologies in disaster films. Communications, 11, 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I.L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascos. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R.S., Olson, R.A., & Gawronski, V.T. (1998). Night and day: Mitigation policy making in Oakland, California, before and after the Loma Prieta earthquake. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 16, 145–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kory, D.N. (1998). Coordinating intergovernmental policies on emergency management in a multi-centered metropolis. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 16, 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEntire, D., Robinson, R.J., & Weber, R.T. (2003). Business responses to the world trade center disaster: A study of corporate roles, functions, and interaction with the public sector. In J.L. Monday (Ed.), Beyond September 11th: An account of post-disaster research (pp. 431–457). Boulder, CO: University of Colorado, Institute of Behavioral Science, Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center, Special Publication No. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denis, H. (1997). Technology, structure, and culture in disaster management. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 15, 293–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quarantelli, E.L. (1966). Organization under stress. In R. Brictson (Ed.), Symposium on emergency operations (pp. 3–19). Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallings, R.A. (1978). The structural patterns of four types of organizations in disaster. In E.L. Quarantelli (Ed.), Disasters: Theory and research (pp. 87–103). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drabek, T.E., & Hoetmer, G.J. (1991). Introduction. In T.E. Drabek & G.J. Hoetmer (Eds.), Emergency management: Principles and practice for local government (pp. xvii– xxxiv). Washington, DC: International City Management Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, A.H. (1969). Communities in disasters: A sociological analysis of collective stress situations. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, D.F., & Colignon, R.A. (1993). Structural change in disaster preparedness networks. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 11, 143–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petak, W.J. (1985). Emergency management: A challenge for public administration. Public Administration Review, 54, 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Form, W.H., & Nosow, S. (1958). Community in disaster. New York: Harper & Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulford, C.L., & Klonglan, G. E. (1981). Creating coordination among organizations: An orientation and planning guide. Ames, IA: Iowa State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drabek, T.E., Tamminga, H.L., Kilijanek, T.S., & Adams, C.R. (1981). Managing multiorganizational emergency responses: Emergent search and rescue networks in natural disasters and remote area settings. Boulder, CO: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burby, R.J. (Ed). (1998). Cooperating with nature: Confronting natural hazards with land-use planning for substainable. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, T.J. (1988). Disaster’s little known pioneer: Canada’s Samuel Henry Prince. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 6, 213–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEntire, D.A., Fuller, C., Johnson, C.W., & Weber, R. (2002). A comparison of disaster paradigms: The search for a holistic policy guide. Public Administration Review, 62(3), 267–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, N.R. (1991). Constraints or effectiveness in disaster management: The bureaucratic imperative versus organizational mission. Canberra Bulletin of Public Administration, 64, 54–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, J.E., & Drabek, T.E. (1973). Complex organizations: A sociological perspective. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton, D., & Johnson, D. (2001). Disasters and communities: Vulnerability, resilience and preparedness. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 10, 270–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S.K. (1992).Governmental response to disasters: The conflict between bureaucratic procedures and emergent norms. Public Administration Review, 52, 135–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, L.J. (1932). Disaster and the sequence-pattern concept of social change. American Journal of Sociology, 38, 207–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, S.L., & Kreps, G.A. (1987). The life history of the emergent organization in times of disaster. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 23, 443–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindell, M.K., & Perry, R.W. (1992). Behavioral foundations of community emergency planning. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, D.F., & Streeter, C.L. (1987). Conceptualizing and measuring disaster preparedness. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 5, 155–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quarantelli, E.L., & Dynes, R.R. (1972). When disaster strikes: It isn’t much like what you’ve heard and read about. Psychology Today, 5(9), 66–70.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology and Criminology, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA

    Thomas E. Drabek

Authors
  1. Thomas E. Drabek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Drabek, T.E. (2007). Community Processes: Coordination. In: Handbook of Disaster Research. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-32353-4_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation