Skip to main content
  • 5373 Accesses

Abstract

Multifactor models can be used to predict returns, generate estimates of abnormal return, and estimate the variability and covariability of returns. This chapter focuses on the use of multifactor models to describe the covariance structure of returns1. Asset return covariance matrices are key inputs to portfolio optimization routines used for asset allocation and active asset management. A factor model decomposes an asset’s return into factors common to all assets and an asset specific factor. Often the common factors are interpreted as capturing fundamental risk components, and the factor model isolates an asset’s sensitivities to these risk factors. The three main types of multifactor models for asset returns are: (1) macroeconomic factor models; (2) fundamental factor models; and (3) statistical factor models. Macroeconomic factor models use observable economic time series like interest rates and inflation as measures of pervasive or common factors in asset returns. Fundamental factor models use observable firm or asset specific attributes such as firm size, dividend yield, and industry classification to determine common factors in asset returns. Statistical factor models treat the common factors as unobservable or latent factors. Estimation of multifactor models is type-specific, and this chapter summarizes the econometric issues associated with estimating each type of factor model and gives illustrations using S-PLUS.

A recent review of factor models for this purpose is given in Chan, Karceski and Lakonishok (1998).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

15.6 References

  • Alexander, C. (2001). Market Models: A Guide to Financial Data Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai, J. and Ng, S., (2002). “Determining the Number of Factors in Approximate Factor Models,” Econometrica, 70, 191–221.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, G. and Rothschild, M. (1983). “Arbitrage, Factor Structure and Mean-Variance Analysis in Large Asset Markets,” Econometrica, 51, 1305–1324.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, L.K., Karceski, J. and Lakonishok, J. (1998). “The Risk and Return from Factors,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 33(2), 159–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, L.K., Karceski, J. and Lakonishok, J. (1999). “On Portfolio Optimization: Forecasting Covariances and Choosing the Risk Model,” Review of Financial Studies, 5, 937–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, N.F., Roll, R., and Ross, S.A. (1986). “Economic Forces and the Stock Market,” The Journal of Business, 59(3), 383–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J.Y., Lo, A.W., and MacKinlay, A.C. (1997). The Econometrics of Financial Markets. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Connor, G. (1995). “The Three Types of Factor Models: A Comparison of Their Explanatory Power,” Financial Analysts Journal, 42–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, G., and Korajczyk, R.A. (1986). “Performance Measurement with the Arbitrage Pricing Theory: A New Framework for Analysis,” Journal of Financial Economics, 15, 373–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor, G., and Korajczyk, R.A. (1988). “Risk and Return in an Equilibrium APT: Application of a New Test Methodology,” Journal of Financial Economics, 21, 255–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor, G. and Korajczyk, R.A. (1993). “A Test for the Number of Factors in an Approximate Factor Model,” The Journal of Finance, vol. 48(4), 1263–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elton, E. and M.J. Gruber (1997). Modern Portfolio Theory and Investment Analysis, 5th Edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. and K.R. French (1992). “The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns”, Journal of Finance, 47, 427–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinold, R.C. and Kahn, R.N. (2000). Active Portfolio Management: A Quantitative Approach for Producing Superior Returns and Controlling Risk, Second Edition. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson and Wichern (1998). Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, W.F. (1970). Portfolio Theory and Capital Markets. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheikh, A. (1995). “BARRA’s Risk Models,” mimeo, BARRA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2006). Factor Models for Asset Returns. In: Modeling Financial Time Series with S-PLUS®. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-32348-0_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics