Skip to main content

Abstract

The fundamental force keeping solar systems, binary stars, and galaxies together is the force of gravity (as opposed to electric, magnetic, and nuclear forces), and it is not unreasonable to suppose that the force governing the large-scale motions of the entire universe is primarily gravitational. If there is some other force governing these motions, there has to date been no evidence for it, neither in the solar system, nor in the observable galaxies. By the universe we mean all detectable components in the sky: stars, galaxies, constellations, pulsars, quasars, as well as such things as cosmic rays and background radiation. If this directly observable universe is part of a much grander system of universe-within-universes (C.V.I. Charlier’s hypothesis1) then there is little we can say.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. See Charlier, 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Penzias and Wilson, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Ohanian and Ruffini, 1994, p. 532.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Winget et al., 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Friedmann, 1922; Robertson, 1935 and 1936; and Walker, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See, for example, Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler, 1973, §27.6, in particular Box 27.2.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See, for example, Weinberg, 1972, Chap. 14, and Ohanian, 1989, Chap. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See Stuckey, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See Hoyle, 1948, and Bondi and Gold, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See Penzias and Wilson, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  11. There have been articles—too numerous to list here—by physicists H. Alfven, E.J. Lerner, and others, and astronomers such as H. Arp and J.V.Narlikar, which query big-bang cosmologies. The bases for many of these arguments involve paucity of observational evidence, ongoing lack of an exact value for H, difficulties with relative abundances of hydrogen and helium, large-scale inhomogeneities in the universe’s structure in conflict with the uniformity of the cosmic background radiation, and so on. See Horgan, 1987, for a review of some of these dissident views.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See Narlikar and Padmanabhan, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See Guth, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See, for example, Landau and Lifshitz, 1987, §2.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See Bondi, 1960, §9.3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Foster, J., Nightingale, J.D. (2006). Elements of cosmology. In: A Short Course in General Relativity. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-27583-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics