Abstract
The standard polygenic model of biometrical genetics can be motivated by considering a quantitative trait determined by a large number of loci acting independently and additively [12]. In a pedigree of m people, let X sukini be the contribution of locus k to person i. The trait value X i = Σ kX sukini for person i forms part of a vector X = (X 1,...,X m)t of trait values for the pedigree. If the effects of the various loci are comparable, then the central limit theorem implies that X follows an approximate multivariate normal distribution. (See the references [19, 21] and Appendix B.) Furthermore, independence of the various loci implies Cov(X 1, X j) = Σ k Cov(X sukini , X sukink . From our covariance decomposition for two non-inbred relatives at a single locus, it follows that Cov(X 1, X j) = 2Φijσ su2inα + Δ7ijσ su2ind , where σ su2inα and σ su2ind are the additive and dominance genetic variances summed over all participating loci. These covariances can be expressed collectively in matrix notation as Var(X) = 2σ su2inα Φ + σ su2ind Δ7. Again it is convenient to assume that X has mean E(X) = 0. Although it is an article of faith that the assumptions necessary for the central limit theorem actually hold for any given trait, one can check multivariate normality empirically.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
8.12 References
Amos CI (1994) Robust variance-components approach for assessing genetic linkage in pedigrees. Amer J Hum Genet 54:535–543
Barnholtz JS, de Andrade M, Page GP, King TM, Peterson LE, Amos CI (1999) Assessing linkage of monoamine oxidase B in a genome-wide scan using a variance components approach. Genet Epidemiol 17(Supplement 1):S49–S54
Blangero J, Almasy L (1997) Multipoint oligogenic linkage analysis of quantitative traits. Genet Epidemiol 14:959–964
Boerwinkle E, Chakraborty R, Sing CF (1986) The use of measured genotype information in the analysis of quantitative phenotypes in man. I. Models and analytical methods. Ann Hum Genet 50:181–194
Cannings C, Thompson EA, Skolnick MH (1978) Probability functions on complex pedigrees. Adv Appl Prob 10:26–61
Daiger SP, Miller M, Chakraborty R (1984) Heritability of quantitative variation at the group-specific component (Gc) locus. Amer J Hum Genet 36:663–676
Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB (1977) Maximum likelihood estimation with incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with discussion). J Roy Stat Soc B 39:1–38
Elston RC, Stewart J (1971) A general model for the genetic analysis of pedigree data. Hum Hered 21:523–542
Falconer DS (1965) The inheritance of liability to certain diseases, estimated from the incidences among relatives. Ann Hum Genet 29:51–79
Falconer DS (1967) The inheritance of liability to diseases with variable age of onset, with particular reference to diabetes mellitus. Ann Hum Genet 31:1–20
Fernando RL, Stricker C, Elston RC (1994) The finite polygenic mixed model: An alternative formulation for the mixed model of inheritance. Theor Appl Genet 88:573–580
[12] Fisher RA (1918) The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Trans Roy Soc Edinburgh 52:399–433
Goldgar DE (1990) Multipoint analysis of human quantitative genetic variation. Amer J Hum Genet 47:957–967
Holt SB (1954) Genetics of dermal ridges: Bilateral asymmetry in finger ridge-counts. Ann Eugenics 18:211–231
Hopper JL, Mathews JD (1982) Extensions to multivariate normal models for pedigree analysis. Ann Hum Genet 46:373–383
Horn RA, Johnson CR (1991) Topics in Matrix Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Jennrich RI, Sampson PF (1976) Newton-Raphson and related algorithms for maximum likelihood variance component estimation. Technometrics 18:11–17
Juo S-HH, Pugh EW, Baffoe-Bonnie A, Kingman A, Sorant AJM, Klein AP, O’Neill J, Mathias RA, Wilson AF, Bailey-Wilson JE (1999) Possible linkage of alcoholism, monoamine oxidase activity and P300 amplitude to markers on chromosome 12q24. Genet Epidemiol 17(Supplement 1):S193–S198
Lange K (1978) Central limit theorems for pedigrees. J Math Biol 6:59–66
Lange K (1997) An approximate model of polygenic inheritance. Genetics 147:1423–1430
Lange K, Boehnke M (1983) Extensions to pedigree analysis. IV. Co-variance component models for multivariate traits. Amer J Med Genet 14:513–524
Lange K, Boehnke M, Weeks D (1987) Programs for pedigree analysis: MENDEL, FISHER, and dGENE. Genet Epidemiology 5:473–476
Lange K, Westlake J, Spence MA (1976) Extensions to pedigree analysis. III. Variance components by the scoring method. Ann Hum Genet 39:484–491
Lawley DN, Maxwell AE (1971) Factor Analysis as a Statistical Method, 2nd ed. Butterworth, London
Lunetta KL, Wilcox M, Smoller J, Neuberg D (1999) Exploring linkage for alcoholism using affection status and quantitative event related potentials phenotypes. Genet Epidemiol 17(Supplement 1):S241–S246
MacCluer JW, Blangero J, Dyer TD, Speer MC (1997) GAW10: Simulated family data for a common oligogenic disease with quantitative risk factors. Genet Epidemiology 14: 737–742
Morton NE, MacLean CJ (1974) Analysis of family resemblance. III. Complex segregation analysis of quantitative traits. Amer J Hum Genet 26:489–503
Ott J (1979) Maximum likelihood estimation by counting methods under polygenic and mixed models in human pedigrees. Amer J Hum Genet 31:161–175
Peressini AL, Sullivan FE, Uhl JJ Jr (1988) The Mathematics of Nonlinear Programming. Springer-Verlag, New York
Rao CR (1973) Linear Statistical Inference and its Applications, 2nd ed. Wiley, New York
Scholz M, Schmidt S, Loesgen S, Bickeboller H (1999) Analysis of principal component based quantitative phenotypes for alcoholism. Genet Epidemiol 17(Supplement 1):S313–S318
Schorck NJ (1993) Extended multipoint identity-by-descent analysis of human quantitative traits: efficiency, power, and modeling considerations. Amer J Hum Genet 53:1306–1319
Self SG, Liang K-Y (1987) Asymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimators and likelihood ratio tests under nonstandard conditions. J Amer Stat Assoc 82:605–610
Strieker C, Fernando RL, Elston RC (1995) Linkage analysis with an alternative formulation for the mixed model of inheritance: The finite polygenic mixed model. Genetics 141:1651–1656
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2003). The Polygenic Model. In: Applied Probability. Springer Texts in Statistics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-22711-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-22711-5_8
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-00425-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-22711-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive