Skip to main content

The Role of Organizational Structure in the Control of Corporate Crime and Terrorism

  • Chapter
The Criminology of White-Collar Crime

Abstract

In this chapter, we draw direct comparisons between corporate crime and terrorism in order to improve our understanding on how to better control each. We acknowledge obvious differences between the corporate criminal and the terrorist organization, but also raise important similarities between them. Namely, corporations and terrorist organizations both strive to survive in highly competitive environments and have adopted more complex organizational structures over time to achieve this goal. However, it is this organizational complexity thatmakes it difficult for criminal justice officials to detect and prosecute illicit behavior. After drawing upon the literature in both areas to describe organizational complexity, we offer several (surprisingly similar) recommendations to better control the corporate criminal and the terrorist organization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anthony, Robert W. 2003. Deterrence and the 9–11 Terrorists.IDA Document D-2802 Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, Michael L., Francis T. Cullen and William J. Maakestad. 1990. “Local prosecutors and corporate crime.” Crime and Delinquency36(3): 356–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, Michael L. and Francis T. Cullen. 1998. Combating Corporate Crime: Local Prosecutors at Work. Boston, MA: Northeastern University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, Michael K, Frederick C. Nold, and J. Gregory Sidak. 1981. “The deterrent effect of antitrust enforcement.” Journal of Political Economy89(3): 429–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, John and Toni Makkai. 1991. “Testing an expected utility model of corporate deterrence.” Law and Society Review25(1): 7–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, Ashton B. 2001. “The architecture of government in the face of terrorism.” International Security26: 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, Richard E. 1980. “Industrial organization, corporate strategy and structure.” Journal of Economic Literature18(1): 64–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Intelligence Agency 2007. CIA World Factbook. http://www.cia.gov/library/publications/ the-world-factbook/geos/sf.html

  • Chandler, Alfred D. 1962. Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise.United States: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinard, Marshall B. and Peter C. Yeager. 1980. Corporate Crime.New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooney, John F., Judson W. Starr, Joseph G. Block, Thomas J. Kelly, Jr., Andrew R. Herrup, Valerie K. Mann, and Gregory Braker. 1996. “Criminal enforcement of environmental laws.” Environmental Crimes Deskbook. Washington, DC: Environmental Law Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, Martha. 1985. “An organizational approach to the analysis of political terrorism.” Orbis 29: 465–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, Martha. 2001. “Theories of terrorism: instrumental and organizational approaches.” in D.C. Rapoport (ed.), Inside Terrorism Organizations(pp. 13–29). London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, Audrey Kurth. 2006. “How al-Qaida ends.” International Security31: 7–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Homeland Security. 2007. Department Subcomponents and Agencies, http://www. dhs.gov/xabout/structure/

  • Dugan, Laura, Gary Lafree, and Alex Piquero. (2005) “Testing a rational choice model of airline Hijackings.” Criminology43: 1031–1066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyck, I.J. Alexander, Adair Morse and Luigi Zingales. 2007. “Who blows the whistle on corporate fraud?” AFA 2007 Chicago Meetings Paper Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/ abstract= 891482

  • Enders, Walter, and Todd Sandler. 1993. “The effectiveness of antiterrorism policies: a vectorautoregression- intervention analysis.” American Political Science Review87: 829–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Ian. 2007. “Top official of Hamas is rebuffed over talks.” The New York TimesJune 24, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisse, Brent and John Braithwaite. 1983. The Impact of Publicity on Corporate Offenders?Albany, NY: State University of Albany Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunaratna, Rohan. 2004 “The post-madrid face of Al Qaeda.” The Washington Quarterly27: 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, James T. 1995. “Pollution as news: Media and stock market reactions to the toxics release inventory data.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management28: 98–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, Winston. 1988. “Enforcement leverage when penalties are restricted.” Journal of Public Economics37(1): 29–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, Friedrich. 1945. “The use of knowledge in society.” American Economic Review34(4): 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Charles W.L., Patricia C. Kelley, Bradley R. Agle, Michael A. Hitt, and Robert E. Hoskisson. 1992. “An empirical examination of the causes of corporate wrongdoing in the United States.” Human Relations45(10): 1055–1076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Sean D. and Richard H. Ward. 2002. Extremist Groups an International Compilation of Terrorist Organizations, Violent Political groups, and Issue-Oriented Militant Movements.2nd Ed. Huntsville, TX: Office of International Criminal Justice and the Institute for the Study of Violent Groups.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, Bruce. 1998. Inside Terrorism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, Bruce and Kim Cragin. 2002. “Four lessons from five countries.” Rand Review, Summer 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, Susan and Richard W. Waterman. 1996. Enforcing the Law: The Case of the Clean Water Acts.Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, Katherine M. 1994. The Organization of Corporate Crime: Dynamics of Antitrust Violation. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleckner, Phil and Craig Jackson. 2004. “Sarbanes-Oxley and Whistle Blower protections.” The CPA Journal74(6): 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFree, Gary and Laura Dugan. 2004. “How does studying terrorism compare to studying crime?” in M. DeFlem (ed.), Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism: Criminological Perspectives(pp. 53– 74). New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFree, Gary, Laura Dugan, and Raven Korte. 2007. Is Counter Terrorism Counterproductive? Northern Ireland 1969–1992.” unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laqueur, Walter. 1999. The New Terrorism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCauley, Clark, Julie Huang, Laura Dugan, and Gary LaFree. 2008. “Sudden Desistence from Terrorism: The Armenian Secret Army for the Liberation of Armenia and the Justice Commandos of the Armenian Genocide.” unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKendall, Marie A. and John A. Wagner III. 1997. “Motive, opportunity, choice, and corporate illegality.” Organization Science: A Journal of the Institute of Management Sciences8(6): 624–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mockaitis, Thomas R. 2007. The “New” Terrorism Myths and Reality.Westport, CT: Praeger Security International.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Terrorism Attacks Upon the United States. 2004. The 9/11 Commission Report. New York: W.W.Norton & Company Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paternoster, Raymond and Sally S. Simpson. 1996. “Sanction threats and appeals to morality: testing a rational choice model of corporate crime.” Law and Society Review30(3): 549–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, Frank and Steven Tombs. 1998. Toxic Capitalism: Corporate Crime and the Chemical Industry. Farnborough: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, Frank. 2001. “Crime and capitalist business corporations.” in Neal Shover and John Paul Wright (eds.), Crimes of Privilege: Readings in White-Collar Crime.Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedahzru, Ami. 2005. Suicide Terrorism.Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillar, Paul R. 2004. “Counterterrorism after Al Qaeda.” The Washington Quarterly27: 101–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiman, Jeffrey. 1997. The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, Albert J. Jr. 1984. “Selecting strategies of social control over organizational life.” In Keith Hawkins and John M. Thomas (eds.) Enforcing Regulation. Boston: Klawer-Nijhoff Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Brad. 2007. Deterrence and WMD Terrorism: Calibrating its Potential Contributions to Risk Reduction.IDA Paper P-4231 Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, Sally S. 2003. “The criminological enterprise and corporate crime.” The Criminologist 28: 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, Sally S. 2002. Corporate Crime, Law, and Social Control.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, Sally S. 1998. “Assessing corporate crime control policies: Criminalization versus cooperation.” Kobe University Law Review32: 101–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, Sally S. and Christopher S. Koper. 1992. “Deterring corporate crime.” Criminology 30(3): 347–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Brent L., Kelly R. Dampshousse, Freedom Jackson, and Amy Sellers. 2003. “The prosecution and punishment of international terrorists in federal courts: 1980–1998.” Criminology and Public Policy1: 311–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, John and Juliet Eilperin. 2007. “Bush’s EPA is pursuing fewer polluters: probes and prosecutions have declined sharply.” The Washington Post.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, David. 2001. “What’s new about the new terrorism and how dangerous is it?” Terrorism and Political Violence13: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Institute of Peace. 1999. How Terrorism Ends.Special Report, No. 48, Washington, DC: United States Institute for Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weimann, Gabriel. 2006. Terror on the Internet.Washington, DC: United States Institute for Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • The White House. 2006. “President discusses creation of military commissions to try suspected terrorists.” White House News Release, September 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • The White House. 2001. “Address to a joint session of congress and the American people.” White House News Release, September 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, Dan B. and Richard W.Waterman. 1991. “The dynamics of political control of the Bureaucracy.” American Political Science Review85: 801–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dugan, L., Gibbs, C. (2009). The Role of Organizational Structure in the Control of Corporate Crime and Terrorism. In: Simpson, S.S., Weisburd, D. (eds) The Criminology of White-Collar Crime. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09502-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics