Skip to main content
  • 833 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Diethelm AG, Deierhoi MH, Hudson SL et al (1995) Progress in renal transplantation. A single center study of 3359 patients over 25 years. Ann Surg 221:446–458

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee HM, Posner MP, King AL et al (1993) Status of long-term (25 years) survival of kidney transplant patients. Transplant Proc 25:1336–1337

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Alvarez G, Gonzalez-Molina M, Cabello M et al (1991) Pulsed and continuous Doppler evaluation of renal dysfunction after kidney transplantation. Eur J Radiol 12:108–112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Arima M, Ogino T, Hosokawa S et al (1989) Functional image diagnosis of kidney transplants using ultrasonic Doppler flowmetry and magnetic resonance imaging. Transplant Proc 21:1907–1911

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. De-Gaetano AM, Boldrini G, Nanni G et al (1989) Noninvasive surveillance of allografted kidneys by ultrasonic duplex scanning. Angiology 40:705–715

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fluckner F, Steiner H, Horn S et al (1990) Farbkodierte Duplexsonographie and Widerstandsindex bei Nierentransplantaten mit Dysfunction. RoFo 153:692–697

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grenier N, Douws C, Morel D et al (1991) Detection of vascular complications in renal allografts with color Doppler flow imaging. Radiology 178:217–223

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hollenbeck M (1994) New diagnostic techniques in clinical nephrology. Colour coded duplex sonography of renal transplants — tool or toy for the nephrologist? Nephrol Dial Transplant 9:1822–1828

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Steinberg HV, Nelson RC, Murphy FB et al (1987) Renal allograft rejection: evaluation by Doppler US and MR Imaging. Radiology 162:337–342

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Radermacher J, Mengel M, Ellis S et al. (2003) The renal arterial resistance index and renal allograft survival. N Engl J Med 349:182–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Restrepo-Schafer IK, Schwerk WB, Muller TF et al (1999) Intrarenal doppler flow analysis in patients with kidney transplantation and stable transplant function. Ultraschall Med 20:87–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Letourneau JG, Day DL, Feinberg SB (1987) Ultrasound and computed tomographic evaluation of renal transplantation. Radiol Clin North Am 25:267–79

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dodd GD, Tublin ME, Shah A et al (1991) Imaging of vascular complications associated with renal transplants. AJR Am J Roentgenol 157:449–59

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hollenbeck M, Kutkuhn B, Grabensee B (1994) Colour Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of transplant renal artery stenosis. Bildgebung 61:248–54

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Townsend RR, Tomlanowich SJ, Goldstein RB et al (1990) Combined Doppler and morphologic sonographic evaluation of renal transplant rejection. J Ultrasound Med 9: 199–206

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Weskott HP (1995) Power US: Phantom measurement of slow flow. Radiology 197:337

    Google Scholar 

  17. Waiser J, Schreiber M, Budde K et al (2000) Prognostic value of the Banff classification. Transpl Int 13:106–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bude RO, Rubin JM, Adler ED (1994) Power versus conventionel color Doppler sonography: comparison in the depiction of normal intrarenal vasculature. Radiology 192:777–780

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Genkins SM, Sanfilippo FP, Caroll BA (1989) Duplex Doppler sonography of renal transplants: Lack of sensitivity and specificity in establishing pathologic diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 152:535–539

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hollenbeck M, Hilbert N, Meusel F et al (1994) Increasing sensitivity and specificity of Doppler sonographic detection of renal transplant rejection with serial investigation technique. Clin Investig 72:609–615

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Phillips AO, Deane C, O’Donnell P et al (1994) Evaluation of Doppler ultrasound in primary non-function of renal transplants. Clin Transplant 8:83–86

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rigsby CM, Burns PM, Weltin GG et al (1987) Doppler signal quantitation in renal allografts: comparison in normal and rejecting transplants, with pathologic correlation. Radiology 162:39–42

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mallek R, Mostbeck G, Kain R et al (1990) Vaskuläre Nierentransplantatabstoßung — Ist eine duplexsonographische Diagnose mölich? RoFo 152:283

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hollenbeck M, Stuhrmann M, Trapp R et al (1994) Farbkodierte Dopplersonographie zur Früherkennung von Abstoßungsreaktionen nach allogener Nierentransplantation. Dtsch med Wochenschr 116:921–927

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kuo P, Monaco AP (1993) Chronic rejection and suboptimal immunosuppression. Transplant Proc 25:2082

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Pozniak MA, Dodd GD, Kelcz F (1992) Ultrasonographic evaluation of renal transplantation. Radiol Clin North Am 30:1053–66

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fahlenkamp D, Schöberger B, Lindeke A et al (1993) Laparaskopische Lymphozelendrainage nach Nierentransplantation. Z Urologie 2:55–56

    Google Scholar 

  28. Benoit G, Bensadoun H, Jardin A (1993) Surgical complications of kidney transplantation. European Urology Update Series 2:178–183

    Google Scholar 

  29. Martinoli C, Bertolotto M, Crespi G et al (1998) Duplex Doppler analysis of interlobular arteries in transplanted kidneys. Eur Radiol 8:765–769

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Takano R, Ando Y, Taniguchi N et al (2001) Power Doppler sonography of the kidney: effect of Valsalva’s maneuver. J Clin Ultrasound 29:384–390

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Schwerk WB, Restrepo IK, Prinz H (1993) Semiquantitative analysis of intrarenal arterial Doppler flow spectra in healthy adults. Ultraschall Med 14:117–122

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Delbeke D, Sacks GA, Sandler MP (1989) Diagnosis of allograft renal vein thrombosis. Clin Nucl Med 14:415–420

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Duckett T, Bretan PN, Cochran ST (1991) Noninvasive radiological diagnosis of renal vein thrombosis in renal transplantation. J Urol 46:403–406

    Google Scholar 

  34. Laplante S, Patriquin HB, Robitaille P et al (1993) Renal vein thrombosis in children: evidence of early flow recovery with Doppler US. Radiology 189:37–42

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Birkeland SA, Rohr N, Elbirk A et al (1995) Chronic rejection in kidney transplant patients receiving cytomegalovirus prophylaxis with acyclovir. Transplant Proc 27: 2040–2041

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Jordan ML, Cook GT, Cardelle CJ (1982) Ten years of experience with vascular complications in renal transplants. J Urol 128:689–692

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Baxter GM, Ireland H, Moss JG et al (1995) Colour Doppler ultrasound in renal transplant artery stenosis: which Doppler index? Clin Radiol 50:618–622

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Maia CR, Bittar AE, Goldani JC et al (1992) Doppler ultrasonography for the detection of renal artery stenosis in transplanted kidneys. Hypertension 19:207–209

    Google Scholar 

  39. Snider JF, Hunter DW, Moradian GP et al (1989) Transplant renal artery stenosis: evaluation with duplex sonography. Radiology 172:1027–1030

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Deane C, Cowan N, Giles J et al (1992) Arteriovenous fistulas in renal transplants: color Doppler ultrasound observations. Urol Radiol 13:211–217

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Griffin JF, McNicholas MM (1992) Morphological appearance of renal allografts in transplant failure. J Clin Ultrasound 20:529–537

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Jansen O, Rob PM, Schmidtke V et al (1992) Followup study of renal transplants by duplex Doppler and grey scaleultrasound. Eur J Radiol 15:26–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Renowden SA, Blethyn J, Cochlin DL (1992) Renal transplant sonography: correlation of Doppler and biopsy results in cellular rejection. Clin Radiol 46:265–269

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Blane CE, Gagnadoux MF, Brunelle F et al (1993) Doppler ultrasonography in the early postoperative evaluation of renal transplants in children. Can Assoc Radiol J 44:176–178

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Saarinen O (1991) Diagnostic value of resistive index of renal transplants in the early postoperative period. Acta Radiol 32:166–169

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Di Palo FQ, Rivolta R, Elli A et al (1993) Effect of cyclosporin A on renal cortical resistances measured by color doppler flowmetry on renal grafts. Nephron 65:240–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Stevens PE, Gwyther SJ, Hanson ME et al (1993) Interpretation of duplex Doppler ultrasound in renal transplants in the early postoperative period. Nephrol Dial Transplant 8:255–258

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Hollenbeck M, Hetzel GR, Hilbert N et al (1995) Dopplersonographische Beurteilung der Effektivität einer Abstoßungstherapie nach Nierentransplantation. Dtsch med Wschr 120:277–282

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Häyry P, Yilmaz S (1994) Chronic allograft rejection: An update. Transplant Proc 26:3159–3160

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Saarinen O, Salmela K, Edgren J (1994) Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of renal transplant artery stenosis-value of resistive index. Acta Radiol 35:586–589

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Rubin JM, Bude RO, Carson PL et al (1994) Power Doppler US: potentially useful alternative to mean frequency-based color Doppler US. Radiology 190:853–856

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Mihatsch MJ, Ryffel B, Gudat F (1993) Morphological criteria of chronic rejection: differential diagnosis, including cyclosporine nephropathy. Transplant Proc 25:2031–2037

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Bude RO, Rubin JM, Adler RD (1994) Power versus conventional color Doppler sonography: comparison in the depiction of normal intrarenal vasculature. Radiology 192:777–780

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Mutze S, Overhoff M, Filimonow S et al (1996) Ultraschalldiagnostik der Transplantatniere. Radiologe 36:31–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Pallardó LM, Sánchez J, Puig N et al (1995) Chronic rejection in 500 kidney transplant patients treated with cyclosporine: incidence and risk factors. Transplant Proc 27:2215–2216

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Fischer T, Mühler M, Kröncke TJ et al (2004) Early Postoperative Ultrasound of Kidney Transplants: Evaluation of Contrast Medium Dynamics Using Time-intensity Curves. RoFo 176:472–477

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Pudszuhn A, Marx C, Malich A et al (2003) Prospective Analysis of Quantification of Contrast Media Enhanced Power Doppler Sonography of Equivocal Breast Lesions. RoFo 175:495–501

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Dietrich CF (2002) 3D real time contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, a new technique. RoFo 174:160–163

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Hohmann J, Skrok J, Puls R et al (2003) Characterization of focal liver lesions with contrast-enhanced low MI real time ultrasound and SonoVue. RoFo 175:835–843

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Quaia E, Bertolotto M, Calderan L et al (2003) US characterization of focal hepatic lesions with intermittent high-acoustic-power mode and contrast material. Acad Radiol 10:739–750

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Basilico R, Blomley MJ, Harvey CJ et al (2002) Which continuous US scanning mode is optimal for the detection of vascularity in liver lesions when enhanced with a second generation contrast agent? Eur J Radiol. 41:184–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Schlosser T, Pohl C, Veltmann C (2001) Feasibility of the flash-replenishment concept in renal tissue: which parameters affect the assessment of the contrast replenishment? Ultrasound Med Biol 27:937–944

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Wei K, Le E, Bin JP et al (2001) Quantification of renal blood flow with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:1135–1140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Girard MS, Mattrey RF, Baker KG et al (2000) Comparison of Standard and Second Harmonic B-mode Sonography in the Detection of Segmental Renal Infarction with SonographicContrast in a Rabbit Model. J Ultrasound Med 19:185–192

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Nilsson A (2004) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the kidneys. Eur Radiol 8:104–109

    Google Scholar 

  66. Bokor D, Chambers JB, Rees PJ et al (2001) Clinical safety of SonoVue, a new contrast agent for ultrasound imaging, in healthy volunteers and in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Invest Radiol 36:104–109

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Correas JM, Claudon M, Tranquart F et al (2003) Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: renal applications. J Radiol 84:2041–2054

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Lucidarme O, Franchi-Abella S, Correas JM et al (2003) Blood flow quantification with contrast-enhanced US: “entrance in the section” phenomenon-phantom and rabbit study. Radiology 228:298–299

    Google Scholar 

  69. Nahar T, Li P, Kuersten B et al (2003) Detection of resting myocardial perfusion defects by SonoVue myocardial contrast echocardiography. Echocardiography 20:511–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Schlosser T, Veltmann C, Lohmaier S et al (2004) Determination of the renal blood flow in macro-and microcirculation by means of pulse inversion imaging. RoFo 176:724–730

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Bouakaz A, Krenning BJ, Vletter WB et al (2003) Contrast superharmonic imaging: a feasibility study. Ultrasound Med Biol. 29:547–553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Siracusano S, Quaia E, Bertolotto M et al (2004) The application of ultrasound contrast agents in the charcterization of renal tumors. World J Urol 22:316–322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Lacourciere Y, Levesque J, Onrot JM et al (2002) Impact of Levovist ultrasonographic contrast agent on the diagnosis and management of hypertensive patients with suspected renal artery stenosis: a Canadian multicentre pilot study. Can Assoc Radiol J 53:219–227

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Lefevre F, Correas JM, Briancon S et al (2002) Contrast-enhanced sonography of the renal transplant using triggered pulse-inversion imaging: preliminary results. Ultrasound Med Biol 28:303–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Robbin ML, Lockhart ME, Barr RG (2003) Renal imaging with ultrasound contrast: current status. Radiol Clin North Am 41:963–978

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Krix M, Kauczor HU, Delorme S (2003) Quantification of tissue perfusion with novel ultrasound methods. Radiologe 43:823–830

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Pollard RE, Sadlowski AR, Bloch SH et al (2002) Contrast-assisted destruction-replenishment ultrasound for the assessment of tumor microvasculature in a rat model Technol Cancer Res Treat 1:459–470

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Wei K, Jayaweera AR, Firoozan S et al (1998) Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as aconstant venous infusion. Circulation 97:473–483

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Fischer T, Ebeling V, Giessing M (2006) A new method for standardized diagnosis following renal transplantation: ultrasound loith contrast-enhancement. Urologe A 45(1):38–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Argalia G, Cacciamani L, Fazi R et al (2004) Contrast-enhanced sonography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: comparison with MR-angiography. Radiol Med 107:208–217

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Blebea J, Zickler R, Volteas N et al (2003) Duplex imaging of the renal arteries with contrast-enhancement. Vasc Endovascular Surg 37:429–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Teixeira OU, Bortolotto LA, Silva HB (2004) The contrast-enhanced Doppler ultrasound with perfluorocarbon exposed sonicated albumin does not improve the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis compared with angiography. J Negat Results Biomed 3:3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Ascenti G, Gaeta M, Magno C et al (2004) Contrastenhanced second-harmonic sonography in the detection of pseudocapsule in renal cell carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 182:1525–1530

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Kreft B, Schild HH (2003) Cystic renal lesions. RoFo 175:892–903

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Veltri A, De Fazio G, Malfitana V et al (2004) Percutaneous US-guided RF thermal ablation for malignant renal tumors: preliminary results in 13 patients. Eur Radiol 14:2303–2310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fischer, T. (2006). Renal Transplant Follow-up. In: Lencioni, R. (eds) Enhancing the Role of Ultrasound with Contrast Agents. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/88-470-0476-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/88-470-0476-4_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0475-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-0476-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics