Skip to main content

Plastic Contamination in Brazilian Freshwater and Coastal Environments: A Source-to-Sea Transboundary Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Plastics in the Aquatic Environment - Part I

Abstract

Plastic debris is ubiquitous in aquatic environments. Freshwater and estuarine ecosystems are not different, and plastic contamination is abundant. Despite ecological and socioeconomic importance, previous reviews identified a low number of publications regarding these ecosystems. An organized review to provide a comprehensive qualitative overview of the plastic debris pollution in Brazil was conducted, considering the literature available (n = 37) on Brazilian freshwater and estuarine areas. Literature was reviewed analysing the potential sources, distribution and contamination patterns in different environmental compartments aiming at gathering information that will contribute to the understanding of the status of the plastic pollution in these Brazilian systems. Results indicate that research regarding freshwater systems is almost absent, whilst estuaries present studies considering all-sized plastics. Sources of plastic debris varied according to the environmental compartment. Composition and distribution are also dependent of the compartment investigated; however, there is a clear dominance of plastics. Regarding distribution, it is a clear knowledge gap, considering that most studies analysed describe the levels of pollution without concluding about pathways and trajectories. Interaction between plastic debris and biota was highlighted, including benthos, mammals, reptiles, molluscs, and fishes. The source-to-sea approach might be a key approach to comprehensively understand the plastic debris problems within the Brazilian coast.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Krelling AP, Williams AT, Turra A (2017) Differences in perception and reaction of tourist groups to beach marine debris that can influence a loss of tourism revenue in coastal areas. Mar Policy 85:87–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.08.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Krelling AP, Turra A (2019) Influence of oceanographic and meteorological events on the quantity and quality of marine debris along an estuarine gradient. Mar Pollut Bull 139:282–298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lima ARA, Costa MF, Barletta M (2014) Distribution patterns of microplastics within the plankton of a tropical estuary. Environ Res 132:146–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2014.03.031

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Moreira FT, Prantoni AL, Martini B et al (2016) Small-scale temporal and spatial variability in the abundance of plastic pellets on sandy beaches: methodological considerations for estimating the input of microplastics. Mar Pollut Bull 102:114–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.11.051

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Possatto FE, Spach HL, Cattani AP et al (2015) Marine debris in a World Heritage Listed Brazilian estuary. Mar Pollut Bull 91:548–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.09.032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Possatto FE, Barletta M, Costa MF et al (2011) Plastic debris ingestion by marine catfish: an unexpected fisheries impact. Mar Pollut Bull 62:1098–1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.01.036

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Santos IR, Friedrich AC, Wallner-Kersanach M, Fillmann G (2005) Influence of socio-economic characteristics of beach users on litter generation. Ocean Coast Manag 48:742–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Leite AS, Santos LL, Costa Y, Hatje V (2014) Influence of proximity to an urban center in the pattern of contamination by marine debris. Mar Pollut Bull 81:242–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.01.032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. de Araújo MCB, Costa MF (2007) An analysis of the riverine contribution to the solid wastes contamination of an isolated beach at the Brazilian Northeast. Manag Environ Qual An Int J 18:6–12. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777830710717677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ivar do Sul JA, Costa MF (2013) Plastic pollution risks in an estuarine conservation unit. J Coast Res 65:48–53. https://doi.org/10.2112/si65-009.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Krelling AP, Souza MM, Williams AT, Turra A (2017) Transboundary movement of marine litter in an estuarine gradient: evaluating sources and sinks using hydrodynamic modelling and ground truthing estimates. Mar Pollut Bull 119:48–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.03.034

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Acha EM, Mianzan HW, Iribarne O et al (2003) The role of the Río de la Plata bottom salinity front in accumulating debris. Mar Pollut Bull 46:197–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Walker TR, Grant J, Archambault MC (2006) Accumulation of marine debris on an intertidal beach in an urban park (Halifax Harbour, Nova Scotia). Water Qual Res J Canada 41:256–262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ivar do Sul JA, Costa MF (2007) Marine debris review for Latin America and the Wider Caribbean region: from the 1970s until now, and where do we go from here? Mar Pollut Bull 54:1087–1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.05.004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Araújo CA (2006) Bibliometria: evolução histórica e questões atuais. Em questão 12:11–32

    Google Scholar 

  16. Araújo RF, Alvarenga L (2011) A bibliometria na pesquisa científica da pós-graduação brasileira de 1987 a 2007. Encontros Bibli Rev eletrônica Bibliotecon e ciência da informação 16:51–70

    Google Scholar 

  17. Barletta M, Lima ARA, Costa MF (2019) Distribution, sources and consequences of nutrients, persistent organic pollutants, metals and microplastics in South American estuaries. Sci Total Environ 651:1199–1218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ziajahromi S, Neale PA, Leusch FDL (2016) Wastewater treatment plant effluent as a source of microplastics: review of the fate, chemical interactions and potential risks to aquatic organisms. Water Sci Technol 74:2253–2269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Andrade MC, Winemiller KO, Barbosa PS et al (2019) First account of plastic pollution impacting freshwater fishes in the Amazon: ingestion of plastic debris by piranhas and other serrasalmids with diverse feeding habits. Environ Pollut 244:766–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.10.088

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Silva-Cavalcanti JS, Silva JDB, de França EJ et al (2017) Microplastics ingestion by a common tropical freshwater fishing resource. Environ Pollut 221:218–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.11.068

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Costa MF, Silva-Cavalcanti JS, Barbosa CC et al (2011) Plastics buried in the inter-tidal plain of a tropical estuarine ecosystem. J Coast Res 64:339–343

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ferreira GVB, Barletta M, Lima ARA et al (2018) High intake rates of microplastics in a Western Atlantic predatory fish, and insights of a direct fishery effect. Environ Pollut 236:706–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.095

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Baptista Neto JA, Gaylarde C, Beech I et al (2019) Microplastics and attached microorganisms in sediments of the Vitória bay estuarine system in SE Brazil. Ocean Coast Manag 169:247–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.12.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bernardino D, Franz B (2016) Lixo flutuante na Baía de Guanabara: passado, presente e perspectivas para o futuro. Desenvolv e Meio Ambient 38:231–252. https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v38i0.47024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. de Carvalho DG, Baptista Neto JA (2016) Microplastic pollution of the beaches of Guanabara Bay, Southeast Brazil. Ocean Coast Manag 128:10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.04.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Castro RO, Silva ML, Marques MRC, de Araújo FV (2016) Evaluation of microplastics in Jurujuba Cove, Niterói, RJ, Brazil, an area of mussels farming. Mar Pollut Bull 110:555–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.05.037

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Cordeiro CAMM, Costa TM (2010) Evaluation of solid residues removed from a mangrove swamp in the São Vicente Estuary, SP, Brazil. Mar Pollut Bull 60:1762–1767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.06.010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Fernandino G, Elliff CI, Frutuoso GA et al (2016) Considerations on the effects of tidal regimes in the movement of floating litter in an estuarine environment: case study of the estuarine system of Santos-São Vicente, Brazil. Mar Pollut Bull 110:591–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.05.080

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Blettler MCM, Ulla MA, Rabuffetti AP, Garello N (2017) Plastic pollution in freshwater ecosystems: macro-, meso-, and microplastic debris in a floodplain lake. Environ Monit Assess 189(11):581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6305-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ivar do Sul JA, Costa MF, Silva-Cavalcanti JS, Araújo MCB (2014) Plastic debris retention and exportation by a mangrove forest patch. Mar Pollut Bull 78:252–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.11.011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lima ARA, Barletta M, Costa MF et al (2016) Changes in the composition of ichthyoplankton assemblage and plastic debris in mangrove creeks relative to moon phases. J Fish Biol 89:619–640. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12838

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lima ARA, Barletta M, Costa MF (2015) Seasonal distribution and interactions between plankton and microplastics in a tropical estuary. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 165:213–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2015.05.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Olivatto GP, Martins MCT, Montagner CC et al (2019) Microplastic contamination in surface waters in Guanabara Bay, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Mar Pollut Bull 139:157–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.12.042

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Figueiredo GM, Vianna TMP (2018) Suspended microplastics in a highly polluted bay: abundance, size, and availability for mesozooplankton. Mar Pollut Bull 135:256–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.07.020

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ryan PG (2018) Entanglement of birds in plastics and other synthetic materials. Mar Pollut Bull 135:159–164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Guebert-Bartholo FM, Barletta M, Costa MF, Monteiro-Filho ELA (2011) Using gut contents to assess foraging patterns of juvenile green turtles Chelonia mydas in the Paranaguá Estuary, Brazil. Endanger Species Res 13:131–143. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Attademo FLN, Balensiefer DC, da Bôaviagem Freire AC et al (2015) Debris ingestion by the Antillean Manatee (Trichechus manatus manatus). Mar Pollut Bull 101:284–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.09.040

  38. Rech S, Borrell Y, García-Vazquez E (2016) Marine litter as a vector for non-native species: what we need to know. Mar Pollut Bull 113:40–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.08.032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Silva MM, Maldonado GC, Castro RO et al (2019) Dispersal of potentially pathogenic bacteria by plastic debris in Guanabara Bay, RJ, Brazil. Mar Pollut Bull 141:561–568

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Clemente CCC, Paresque K, Santos PJP (2018) The effects of plastic bags presence on a macrobenthic community in a polluted estuary. Mar Pollut Bull 135:630–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.07.070

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Santana MFM, Ascer LG, Custódio MR et al (2016) Microplastic contamination in natural mussel beds from a Brazilian urbanized coastal region: rapid evaluation through bioassessment. Mar Pollut Bull 106:183–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.02.074

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Birnstiel S, Soares-Gomes A, da Gama BAP (2019) Depuration reduces microplastic content in wild and farmed mussels. Mar Pollut Bull 140:241–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.01.044

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. De Souza e Silva Pegado T, Schmid K, Winemiller KO et al (2018) First evidence of microplastic ingestion by fishes from the Amazon River estuary. Mar Pollut Bull 133:814–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.06.035

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Fisner M, Taniguchi S, Majer AP et al (2013) Concentration and composition of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in plastic pellets: implications for small-scale diagnostic and environmental monitoring. Mar Pollut Bull 76:349–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.09.045

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Alves VEN, Patrício J, Dolbeth M et al (2016) Do different degrees of human activity affect the diet of Brazilian silverside Atherinella brasiliensis? J Fish Biol 89:1239–1257. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13023

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Ferreira GVB, Barletta M, Lima ARA et al (2016) Plastic debris contamination in the life cycle of Acoupa weakfish (Cynoscion acoupa) in a tropical estuary. ICES J Mar Sci J du Cons 73:2695–2707. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsw108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Dantas DV, Ribeiro CIR, Frischknecht CCA et al (2019) Ingestion of plastic fragments by the Guri sea catfish Genidens genidens (Cuvier, 1829) in a subtropical coastal estuarine system. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:8344–8351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04244-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Vendel AL, Bessa F, Alves VEN et al (2017) Widespread microplastic ingestion by fish assemblages in tropical estuaries subjected to anthropogenic pressures. Mar Pollut Bull 117:448–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.01.081

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Ramos JAA, Barletta M, Costa MF (2012) Ingestion of nylon threads by gerreidae while using a tropical estuary as foraging grounds. Aquat Biol 17:29–34. https://doi.org/10.3354/ab00461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Silva MLD, Castro RO, Sales AS, Araújo FVD (2018) Marine debris on beaches of Arraial do Cabo, RJ, Brazil: an important coastal tourist destination. Mar Pollut Bull 130:153–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.03.026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Dantas DV, Barletta M, da Costa MF (2012) The seasonal and spatial patterns of ingestion of polyfilament nylon fragments by estuarine drums (Sciaenidae). Environ Sci Pollut Res 19:600–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-011-0579-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Ferreira GVB, Barletta M, Lima ARA (2019) Use of estuarine resources by top predator fishes. How do ecological patterns affect rates of contamination by microplastics? Sci Total Environ 655:292–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Chen C-L (2015) Regulation and management of marine litter. In: Bergmann M, Gutow L, Klages M (eds) Marine anthropogenic litter. Springer, Cham, pp 395–428

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  54. Schnurr REJ, Alboiu V, Chaudhary M et al (2018) Reducing marine pollution from single-use plastics (SUPs): a review. Mar Pollut Bull 137:157–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.10.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Campos HKT (2014) Recycling in Brazil: challenges and prospects. Resour Conserv Recycl 85:130–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Niaounakis M (2017) Regulatory framework. In: Management of marine plastic debris. Elsevier, Cambridge, pp 361–413

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  57. Huang J, Huang Y, Zhang Z (2014) Coupled effects of natural and anthropogenic controls on seasonal and spatial variations of river water quality during baseflow in a coastal watershed of southeast china. PLoS One 3:e91528

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Costa MF, Barletta M (2016) Special challenges in the conservation of fishes and aquatic environments of South America. J Fish Biol 89:4–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Pereira LCC, Monteiro MC, Guimarães DO et al (2010) Seasonal effects of wastewater to the water quality of the Caeté river estuary, Brazilian Amazon. An Acad Bras Cienc 82:467–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Lebreton LCM, Van der Zwet J, Damsteeg J-W et al (2017) River plastic emissions to the world’s oceans. Nat Commun 8:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15611

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Costa MF, Barletta M (2015) Microplastics in coastal and marine environments of the western tropical and sub-tropical Atlantic Ocean. Environ Sci Process Impacts 17:1868–1879

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Niaounakis M (2017) Prevention and mitigation. In: Management of marine plastic debris. Elsevier, Cambridge, pp 317–359

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  63. Storrier KL, McGlashan DJ (2006) Development and management of a coastal litter campaign: the voluntary coastal partnership approach. Mar Policy 30:189–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2005.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Hidalgo-Ruz V, Honorato-Zimmer D, Gatta-Rosemary M et al (2018) Spatio-temporal variation of anthropogenic marine debris on Chilean beaches. Mar Pollut Bull 126:516–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.11.014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Honorato-Zimmer D, Kruse K, Knickmeier K et al (2019) Inter-hemispherical shoreline surveys of anthropogenic marine debris – a binational citizen science project with schoolchildren. Mar Pollut Bull 138:464–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.11.048

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

APK would like to thank Lucas Gottardello Chierigatti for elaborating map. APK kindly thanks the support from the Federal Institute of Paraná (IFPR, Paranaguá Campus). AL acknowledges the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER) through the Lisbon’s Regional Operational Programme (LISBOA-01-0145-FEDER-032209) and the Portuguese Foundation for Science & Technology (FCT) through the project PTDC/BIA-BMA/32209/2017 (SARDITEMP). AL also thanks FCT through the project UIDB/04292/2020 granted to MARE (Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre) at the ISPA – University Institute (Department of Biosciences). This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) – Brazil – Finance Code 001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Allan P. Krelling .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lima, A.R.A., Silva, M.D., Possatto, F.E., Ferreira, G.V.B., Krelling, A.P. (2020). Plastic Contamination in Brazilian Freshwater and Coastal Environments: A Source-to-Sea Transboundary Approach. In: Stock, F., Reifferscheid, G., Brennholt, N., Kostianaia, E. (eds) Plastics in the Aquatic Environment - Part I. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, vol 111. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2020_514

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics