Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Environmental Impact Assessment of Subsurface Drainage Projects

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Unconventional Water Resources and Agriculture in Egypt

Part of the book series: The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry ((HEC,volume 75))

Abstract

Nowadays, Egypt is entering a new phase in which human food needs must harmonize with environmental and sustainable principles. Drainage impacts on the environment have given rise to a lot of concern, so in the future the design and operation of drainage systems should satisfy both agricultural and environmental objectives. Therefore, this study was developed to perform environmental impact assessment (EIA) for the subsurface drainage projects. The study was carried out on Mashtul Pilot Area (MPA) in Egypt as a real case study and the experimental fieldwork. The study was conducted in two main steps: The first one is the experimental fieldwork that was formulated to obtain measured data necessary to evaluate and assess the impact of subsurface drainage projects in the main categories of the environmental issues. The second step is developing an EIA matrix for subsurface drainage projects to qualify and quantify the baseline of environmental setting accompanied with their potential impacts. Expertise advice and help were used to assess these indices based on the degree of each impact and distributed among environmental issues to quantify the overall impacts. It could be concluded that subsurface drainage projects have direct and indirect impacts. These impacts could be positive or negative. The results of the EIA matrix application for subsurface drainage projects according to the expert’s evaluation and expertise prevailed that the environmental impact assessment of subsurface drainage projects according to the environmentally feasible existing situation and substantial benefits is very likely to affect positively 85.50%, zero 6.5%, and negatively 5%. These values indicate that subsurface drainage projects have significant positive impacts on irrigation and drainage environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hefny MM, Mohamed E, Metwali R, Mohamed AI (2013) Assessment of genetic diversity of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) genotypes under saline irrigation water based on some selection indices. Aust J Crop Sci 7(12):1935–1945

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Heather F, Ron Flemg P (2001) Environmental benefits of Tile Drainage. Prepared for LICO-Land Improvement Contractors of Ontario, Ridgetown College, University of Guelph

    Google Scholar 

  3. Van Hoorn JW, Van Alphen JG (1994) Salinity control. In: Ritzema HP (ed) Drainage principles and applications, 2nd edn. ILRI Publication 16

    Google Scholar 

  4. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) (1994) Water policies and agriculture. In: Special chapter of the state of food and agriculture 1993, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abdel-Dayem MS (1994) Concepts of design methods. In: Refreshing course on land drainage in Egypt, Dec 1994, pp 10–19

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gowing JW, Wyseure GC (1992) Dry-drainage a sustainable and cost-effective solution to waterlogging and salinization. In: Proceedings of 5th international drainage workshop, vol 3. ICID-CIID, Lahore, 6.26–6.34

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brahmabhat VS, Dalwadi GB, Chhabra SB, Ray SS, Dadhwal VK (2000) Land use/land cover change mapping in Mahi Canal Command Area, Gujarat, using multitemporal satellite data. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 28:221–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02990813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vlahinic M (1996) Socio-economic and health aspects of drainage in relation to environment and sustainable agriculture. In: Proceeding of the 6th drainage workshop, drainage and the environment, Ljubljana

    Google Scholar 

  9. Irwin RW, Whiteley HR (1983) Effects of land drainage on stream flow. Can Water Resour J 8(2):88–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Abdel-Dayem MS (1993) Agricultural drainage in Egypt. DRI, Water Research Centre, Cairo

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ahmed N (1974) Waterlogging and salinity problems in Pakistan. Appendix E drainage practices adopted in the world. Solution of the problem. Irrigation and Drainage Research Council of Pakistan, Lahore, pp E22–E41

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gilliam JW, Skaggs RW (1986) Controlled agricultural drainage to maintain water quality. J Irrig Drain Eng 112(3):254–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. El-Zawahry A (2004) EIA and public participations, project alternatives, mitigation measures, and Environmental Management Plan (EMP). In: Workshop on environmental impact

    Google Scholar 

  14. APP, Advisory Panel Project on Water Management (2004) Workshop on environmental impact assessment/wetlands management, Cairo, 11–15 Dec 2004

    Google Scholar 

  15. Clark R (1994) Cumulative effects assessment: a tool for sustainable development. Impact Assess 12(3):319–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Edwards M (2007) Environmental impact analysis from community guide to development impact analysis. http://www.lic.wisc.edu/all_resources/impacts

  17. Canter LW, Kamath J (1995) Questionnaire for cumulative impacts. Environ Impact Assess Rev 15(4):311–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. CEQ (Council on Environmental Quality) (1997) Considering cumulative effects under the National Environmental Policy Act. Washington

    Google Scholar 

  19. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) (1995) Environmental impact assessment of irrigation and drainage projects. In: Dougherty TC, Hall AW, Wallingford HR (eds) FAO irrigation and drainage paper 53

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gammal EH, Ali H (2010) Commissioning of abandoned drainage water reuse systems in Egypt. A case study of upgrading the Umoum project, Nile Delta. Irrig Drain 60(1):115–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sallam G, Abdelaty I (2012) Subsurface drainage impacts on the environment in Egypt. In: The 11th international drainage workshop on agricultural drainage needs and future priorities, Cairo

    Google Scholar 

  22. DRI (Drainage Research Institute) (1987) Mashtul Pilot Area, physical description. Technical Report no. 57, Pilot Areas and Drainage Technology Project, Drainage Research Institute

    Google Scholar 

  23. Skaggs RW, Broadhead RG (1982) Drainage strategies and peak flood flows. ASAE, Paper, St. Joseph

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vermont Agency of Agriculture, Food, and Markets (VT AAFM) and the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources (VT ANR) (2017) Vermont Subsurface Agricultural Tile Drainage report. agriculture.vermont.gov/tile-drainage

  25. Hirt U, Wetzig A, Amatya MD, Matranga M (2011) Impact of seasonality on artificial drainage discharge under temperate climate conditions. Int Rev Hydrobiol 96:561–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gardner WK, Drendel MF, McDonald GK (1994) Effects of subsurface drainage, cultivation and stubble retention on soil porosity and crop growth in a high rainfall area. Aust J Exp Agric 34:411–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Baker JL, Johnson HP (1976) Impact of subsurface drainage on water quality. In: Proceedings from the 3rd national drainage symposium, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  28. Azhar AH (2010) Impact of subsurface drainage on soil salinity in Pakistan. J Anim Plant Sci 20(2):94–98

    Google Scholar 

  29. DRI (Drainage Research Institute) (2000) Design criteria for (Mashtul) Pilot Area after 14 years of subsurface drainage system. Technical Report TR 87, Drainage Research Programme Project (DRP). DRI, El-Kanater

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gaynor JD, MacTavish DC, Findlay WI (1995) Atrazine and metolachlor loss in surface runoff from three tillage treatments in corn. J Environ Qual 24:246–256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Loudon TL, Gold AJ, Ferns SE, Yokum W (1986) Tile drainage water quality from shallow tile in heavy soil. ASAE Paper No. 86-2560

    Google Scholar 

  32. Feyereisen GW, Francesconi W, Smith DR, Papiernik SK, Kruger ES, Wente CD (2015) Effect of replacing surface inlets with blind or gravel inlets on sediment and phosphorus subsurface drainage losses. J Environ Qual 44(2):594–604

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. King KW, Williams MR, Fausey NR (2016) Effect of crop type and season on nutrient leaching to tile drainage under a corn-soybean rotation. J Soil Water Conserv 71(1):56–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Christianson LE, Harmel RD, Smith D, Williams MR, King K (2016) Assessment and synthesis of fifty years of published drainage phosphorus losses. J Environ Qual. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2015.12.0593. Accepted paper, posted 5/03/2016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Johnston WR (1976) Drainage installation problems in the San Joaquin Valley, California, USA. In: Proceedings of the international drainage workshop, paper 4.01, publication 25

    Google Scholar 

  36. King KW, Williams MR, Macrae ML, Fausey NR, Frankenberger J, Smith DR, Kleinman PJ, Brown LC (2015) Phosphorus transport in agricultural subsurface drainage: a review. J Environ Qual 44(2):467–485

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Azhar AH, Latif M (2011) Subsurface drainage impact assessment on crop yield. J Anim Plant Sci 21(2):215–219

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Water and Water Structures Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt

    Ismail Abd-Elaty & Abdelazim M. Negm

  2. Drainage Research Institute (DRI), National Water Research Centre (NWRC), Delta Barrages (El Kanater), P.O. Box 1362/5, Cairo, Egypt

    Gehan A. H. Sallam

Authors
  1. Ismail Abd-Elaty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abdelazim M. Negm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gehan A. H. Sallam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ismail Abd-Elaty .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Engineering, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt

    Abdelazim M. Negm

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Abd-Elaty, I., Negm, A.M., Sallam, G.A.H. (2017). Environmental Impact Assessment of Subsurface Drainage Projects. In: Negm, A. (eds) Unconventional Water Resources and Agriculture in Egypt. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, vol 75. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2017_123

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation