Skip to main content

Body Composition in Heavy Smokers: Comparison of Segmental Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis and Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Body Metabolism and Exercise

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((NR,volume 840))

Abstract

Smokers tend to have lower body mass index, on one hand, and increased abdominal obesity, on the other hand. Also, low levels of lean mass (LM) and bone mineral content (BMC) were found among older smokers compared with non-smokers. This altered body composition and its consequences raise the need for simple and reliable methods for assessment of body composition in smokers. This study aimed to compare body composition assessment by segmental bioelectrical impedance analysis (sBIA) with the reference method, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Body composition was measured by sBIA (Tanita BC-545) and DEXA (Hologic) in 49 heavy smokers (>15 cigarettes/day, mean age 43.8 ± 12.0). The comparison included correlations and differences between measurements obtained using the two methods as well as the Blande-Altman analysis. Whole-body fat mass (FM) and LM measured by the two methods were found to be highly correlated (r > 0.9, p < 0.001). Compared with DEXA, sBIA significantly overestimated whole-body LM and BMC (1,126 g and 382 g, respectively, p < 0.01). The Bland-Altman analysis revealed a good agreement for whole-body FM and LM, but a poor agreement for BMC. The segmental FM percentage and LM were also highly correlated (r > 0.9, p < 0.001). However, sBIA significantly overestimated LM of the trunk and legs and underestimated the appendicular FM percentage. Verified by DEXA, sBIA provides reliable measures of whole-body LM, FM, and trunk FM in heavy smokers. A lesser degree of agreement was found for BMC, appendicular LM, and FM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akbartabartoori M, Lean ME, Hankey CR (2005) Relationships between cigarette smoking, body size and body shape. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 29(2):236–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bamia C, Trichopoulou A, Lenas D, Trichopoulos D (2004) Tobacco smoking in relation to body fat mass and distribution in a general population sample. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 28(8):1091–1096

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett-Connor E, Khaw KT (1989) Cigarette smoking and increased central adiposity. Ann Intern Med 111(10):783–787

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beeson WL, Batech M, Schultz E, Salto L, Firek A, Deleon M, Balcazar H, Cordero-Macintyre Z (2010) Comparison of body composition by bioelectrical impedance analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in Hispanic diabetics. Int J Body Compos Res 8(2):45–50

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307–310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Canoy D, Wareham N, Luben R, Welch A, Bingham S, Day N, Khaw KT (2005) Cigarette smoking and fat distribution in 21,828 British men and women: a population-based study. Obes Res 13(8):1466–1475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo EM, Goodman-Gruen D, Kritz-Silverstein D, Morton DJ, Wingard DL, Barrett-Connor E (2003) Sarcopenia in elderly men and women: the Rancho Bernardo study. Am J Prev Med 25:226–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clair C, Chiolero A, Faeh D, Cornuz J, Marques-Vidal P, Paccaud F, Mooser V, Waeber G, Vollenweider P (2011) Dose-dependent positive association between cigarette smoking, abdominal obesity and body fat: cross-sectional data from a population-based survey. BMC Public Health 11:23

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Demirbag D, Ozdemir F, Ture M (2006) Effects of coffee consumption and smoking habit on bone mineral density. Rheumatol Int 26(6):530–535

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elgán C, Samsioe G, Dykes AK (2003) Influence of smoking and oral contraceptives on bone mineral density and bone remodeling in young women: a 2-year study. Contraception 67(6):439–447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Filozof C, Fernández Pinilla MC, Fernández-Cruz A (2004) Smoking cessation and weight gain. Obes Rev 5(2):95–103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fürstenberg A, Davenport A (2011) Comparison of multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry assessments in outpatient hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 57(1):123–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jhun HJ, Seo HG, Lee DH, Sung MW, Kang YD, Syn HC, Jun JK (2010) Self-reported smoking and urinary cotinine levels among pregnant women in Korea and factors associated with smoking during pregnancy. J Korean Med Sci 25(5):752–757

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim JH, Shim KW, Yoon YS, Lee SY, Kim SS, Oh SW (2012) Cigarette smoking increases abdominal and visceral obesity but not overall fatness: an observational study. PLoS One 7(9):e45815

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JS, Auyeung TW, Kwok T, Lau EM, Leung PC, Woo J (2007) Associated factors and health impact of sarcopenia in older Chinese men and women: a cross-sectional study. Gerontology 53:404–410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lloret Linares C, Ciangura C, Bouillot JL, Coupaye M, Declèves X, Poitou C, Basdevant A, Oppert JM (2011) Validity of leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance analysis to estimate body fat in obesity. Obes Surg 21(7):917–923

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Szulc P, Garnero P, Claustrat B, Marchand F, Duboeuf F, Delmas PD (2002) Increased bone resorption in moderate smokers with low body weight: the Minos study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87(2):666–674

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Szulc P, Duboeuf F, Marchand F, Delmas PD (2004) Hormonal and lifestyle determinants of appendicular skeletal muscle mass in men: the MINOS study. Am J Clin Nutr 80:496–503

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thibault R, Genton L, Pichard C (2012) Body composition: why, when and for who? Clin Nutr 31(4):435–447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Borst B, Koster A, Yu B, Gosker HR, Meibohm B, Bauer DC, Kritchevsky SB, Liu Y, Newman AB, Harris TB, Schols AM (2011) Is age-related decline in lean mass and physical function accelerated by obstructive lung disease or smoking? Thorax 66(11):961–969

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grants from the Rappaport Institute, the Krol Foundation of Barnegat N.J., the Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute of Gerontology and Human Development, and ESHEL – the association for planning and development of services for the aged in Israel.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in relation to this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Z. Reznick .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rom, O., Reznick, A.Z., Keidar, Z., Karkabi, K., Aizenbud, D. (2014). Body Composition in Heavy Smokers: Comparison of Segmental Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis and Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry. In: Pokorski, M. (eds) Body Metabolism and Exercise. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology(), vol 840. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/5584_2014_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics