Abstract
Since technological innovation is considered one of the leading factors in maintaining industrial dynamics and national development, this issue remains extremely important for companies, governments, and many other technologyrelated actors, especially when global market competition becomes severe and when the competitiveness of a country is weakening. Technology is understood not simply as mechanical information, but rather as a certain kind of knowledge embodied in people. Hence to understand technological innovation, we have to take into consideration the influence of diverse factors, such as social norms, product-market conditions, regulations, and the quality of education. The techno-governance approach focuses on the way in which innovation depends on the harmonization of diverse technology-related actors, and on the relationship of innovation to the aforementioned institutional and non-institutional contingencies. This approach allows us to examine the dynamic interactions between organizations (as actors) and institutions. These interactions are particularly affected by drastic changes in product-market conditions and by efforts to revive weakening industries by transforming the old techno-governance structure into a new one. Such a comprehensive approach is considered crucial to a proper understanding of the transformation of industries in a turbulent and path-disturbing environment, something that has become a recurrent situation in such high-tech industries as the semiconductor, telecommunications, and biotechnology industries
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Casper, S. (1999) “High technology governance and institutional adaptiveness: Do technology policies usefully promote commercial innovation within the German biotechnology industry?” Paper presented at Conference on National Innovation Systems and the Idea-Innovation Chain, held at The Netherlands Institute of Advanced Study in the Humanities and Social Sciences, Wassenaar, The Netherlands, 27–29 January.
Daiyamondo (2004) “Keitai taikoku ga kawaru! (The leading mobile telephone country is changing!).” 24 January, pp. 30–43.
Hage, J. and Hollingsworth, J.R. (2000) “A strategy for the analysis of idea innovation networks and institutions.” Organization Studies 21(5): 971–1004.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Yoshitaka Okada
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Okada, Y. (2006). Conclusion. In: Okada, Y. (eds) Struggles for Survival. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/4-431-28916-X_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/4-431-28916-X_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-28874-9
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-28916-6
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)