Skip to main content

Effects of mood and argument strength on product evaluation in a personal sales conversation

  • Chapter
International Advertising and Communication

Abstract

In a personal sales conversation between a customer and a salesperson the salesperson usually presents arguments for purchase alternatives to the customer. In this article we analyse effects of customers’ mood on their product evaluation in a personal sales conversation. In order to determine these effects, we simulated a sales conversation in a role-playing experiment. Other authors analysing mood effects often consider only direct mood effects on the evaluation of environmental stimuli but they do not examine indirect mood effects or moderator variables. The results of our study show that customers’ mood has a direct effect and an indirect effect through the customers’ perception of the strength of the arguments provided by the salesperson on product evaluation. The results also illustrate that the strength of both mood effects depends on customer involvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bagozzi, R. P. and Y. Yi (1991), “Multitrait-Multimethod Matrices in Consumer Research,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 17, No. 4, 426–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R.P.; Yi, Y. and L. Phillips (1991), “Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research,” in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 36, No. 3, 421–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaney, P. H. (1986), “Affect and Memory: A Review,” in: Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 99, 229–246.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bless, H.; Bohner, G.; Schwarz, N. and F. Strack (1990), “Mood and Persuasion: a Cognitive Response Analysis,” in: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 16, No. 2, 331–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bless, H. and N. Schwarz (1999), “Sufficient and Necessary Conditions in Dual-Process Models,” in: Chaiken, S.; Trope, Y. (1999) (eds.): Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology, The Guilford Press, New York, 423–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohner, G.; Moskowitz, G. B. and S. Chaiken (1995), “The Interplay of Heuristic and Systematic Processing of Social Information,” in: Stroebe, W.; Hewstone, M. (1995) (eds.): European Review of Social Psychology, Vol. 6, Wiley, Chichester, 33–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H. (1981), “Mood and Memory,” in: American Psychologist, Vol. 36, 129–148.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Breckler, S. J. (1993), “Emotion and Attitude Change,” in: Lewis, M.; Haviland, J. M. (1993) (eds.): Handbook of Emotions, The Guilford Press, New York, 461–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. S. and A. M. Isen (1982), “Toward Understanding the Relationship between Feeling States and Social Behavior,” in: Hastorf, A. H.; Isen, A. M. (1982) (eds.): Cognitive Social Psychology, Elsevier, New York, 76–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clore, G. L.; Schwarz, N. and M. Conway (1994), “Affective Causes and Consequences of Social Information Processing,” in: Wyer, R. S.; Srull, T. K. (1994) (eds.): Handbook of Social Cognition, 2nd ed., Erlbaum, Hillsdale, 323–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, R. H.; Sanbonmatsu, D. M.; Powell, M. C. and F. R. Kardes (1986), “On the Automatic Activation of Attitudes,” in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 50, 229–238.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forgas, J. P. (1998), “On Feeling Good and Getting Your Way: Mood Effects on Negotiator Cognition and Bargaining Strategies,” in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 74, No. 3, 565–577.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forgas, J. P. (1999), “Feeling and Speaking: Mood Effects on Verbal Communication Strategies,” in: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 25, No. 7, 850–863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forgas, J. P. and G. H. Bower (1988), “Affect in Social and Personal Judgments,” in: Fiedler, K.; Forgas, J. P. (1988) (eds.): Affect, Cognition, and Social Behavior, Hogrefe, Göttingen, 183–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C. and D. F. Larcker (1981), “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,” in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, C. and A. Giering (1996), “Konzeptualisierung und Operationalisierung komplexer Konstrukte,” in: Marketing ZFP, Vol. 18, No. 1, 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A.; Shalker, T.; Clark, M. and L. Karp (1978), “Affect, Accessibility of Material in Memory, and Behavior: A Cognitive Loop?” In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 36, 1–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M.; Means, B.; Patrick, R. and G. Nowicki (1982), “Some Factors Influencing Decision-Making Strategy and Risk Taking,” in: Clark, M. S.; Fiske, S. T. (1982) (eds.): Affect and Cognition, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, 243–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. and D. Sörbom (1997), “LISREL 8: User’s Reference Guide”, Uppsala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klauer, K. C.; Roßnagel, C. and J. Musch (1997), “List Context-Effects in Evaluation Priming,” in: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Vol. 23, No. 1, 246–255.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, D. M.; Asuncion, A. G. and F. Rosselli (1992), “Impact of Positive Affect on Persuasion Processes,” in: Review of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 14, 247–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, M. N. and L. Andrews (1983), “The Effect of Mood and Incentives on Helping: Are There Some Things Money Can’t Buy?” in: Motivation and Emotion, Vol. 7, No. 2, 179–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E. (1994), “Two Routes to Persuasion: State of the Art,” in: d’Ydewalle, G.; Eelen, P.; Bertelson, P. (1994) (eds.): International Perspectives on Psychological Science, Vol. 2, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, 229–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E. and J. T. Cacioppo (1981), “Issue Involvement as a Moderator of the Effects on Attitude of Advertising Content and Context,” in: Monroe, K. B. (1981) (ed.): Advances in Consumer Research, Association for Consumer Research, Valdosta, 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E. and J. T. Cacioppo (1983), “Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion: Application to Advertising,” in: Percy, L. (1983) (ed.): Advertising and Consumer Psychology, Lexington Books, Lexington, 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E. and J. T. Cacioppo (1984), “The Effects of Involvement on Responses to Argument Quantity and Quality: Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion,” in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 46, No. 1, 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E. and J. T. Cacioppo (1986), “The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion,” in: Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 19, 20–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E.; Cacioppo, J. T. and R. Goldman (1981), “Personal Involvement as a Determinant of Argument-Based Persuasion,” in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 41, No. 5, 847–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E.; Cacioppo, J. T. and D. Schumann (1983), “Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 10, 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E.; Haugtvedt, C. P. and S. M. Smith (1995), “Elaboration as a Determinant of Attitude Strength: Creating Attitudes that are Persistent, Resistant, and Predictive of Behavior,” in: Petty, R. E.; Krosnick, J. A. (1995) (eds.): Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, 93–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E.; Schumann, D. W.; Richman, S. A. and A. J. Strathman (1993), “Positive Mood and Persuasion: Different Roles for Affect Under High-and Low-Elaboration Conditions,” in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 64, No. 1, 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E. and D. T. Wegener (1999), “The Elaboration Likelihood Model: Current Status and Controversies,” in: Chaiken, S.; Trope, Y. (1999) (eds.): Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology, The Guilford Press, New York, 41–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ping, R. A. Jr. (1995), “A Parsimonious Estimating Technique for Interaction and Quadratic Latent Variables”, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 32, 336–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusting, C. L. (1998), “Personality, Mood, and Cognitive Processing of Emotional Information: Three Conceptual Frameworks,” in: Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 124, No. 2, 165–199.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N. (1987), “Stimmung als Information: Untersuchungen zum Einfluss von Stimmungen auf die Bewertung des eigenen Lebens [Mood as Information],” Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N. (1990), “Feelings as Information: Informational and Motivational Functions of Affective States,” in: Higgins, E. T.; Sorrentino, R. M. (1990) (eds.): Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior, Vol. 2, The Guilford Press, New York, 527–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N.; Bless, H. and G. Bohner (1991), “Mood and Persuasion: Affective States Influence the Processing of Persuasive Communications,” in: Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 24, 161–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N. and G. L. Clore (1996), “Feelings and Phenomenal Experiences,” in: Higgins, E. T.; Kruglanski, A. (1996) (eds.): Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, The Guilford Press, New York, 433–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberer, G. (1999), “Die Stimmung als Werbewirkungsfaktor,” in: Marketing ZFP, Vol. 21, No. 2, 131–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberer, G. and M. Jaekel (1996), “Marketingfaktor Stimmungen: Grundlagen, Instrumente, Fallbeispiele,” Schäffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegener, D. T.; Petty, R. E. and D. J. Klein (1994), “Effects of Mood on High Elaboration Attitude Change: The Mediating Role of Likelihood Judgments,” in: European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 24, 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Sandra Diehl Ralf Terlutter

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag ∣ GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gierl, H., Bambauer, S. (2006). Effects of mood and argument strength on product evaluation in a personal sales conversation. In: Diehl, S., Terlutter, R. (eds) International Advertising and Communication. DUV. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-8350-5702-2_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics