Skip to main content

The role of product involvement in advertising message perception and believability

  • Chapter
International Advertising and Communication

Abstract

This investigation examines the variable product involvement and its relationship to the degree to which consumers perceive and believe advertiser’s claims. The study tests the hypothesis that consumers are more likely to believe the claims made on behalf of high involvement products — particularly for health-related goods and services. A survey revealed that while advertiser’s claims were clearly perceived by the vast majority of respondents, a large percentage also amplified the advertiser’s claims — always to the advertiser’s benefit. Respondent’s were significantly less likely to believe advertiser’s claims for low involvement products (such as shampoo), but were significantly more likely to believe claims made on behalf of a high involvement products, and in particular, claims for health-related products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Advertising Age (1972), Howard’s Research will Draw Debate Until Substantiated. June 19, p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bergerson, S. (1995), “Will the Poof Go Puff for U.S. Advertisers?” in Managing Intellectual Property, London, 53,14, 14.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bowen, L. and S. Chaffee (1974), “Product Involvement and Pertinent Advertising Appeals,” in Journalism Quarterly, 5,14, 613.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bruskin, R. H. & Associates (1981), The Bruskin Report, No. 40, New Brunswick, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hamas, R.S., MD (1999), “The Postoperative Shape of Round and Teardrop Saline-filled Breast Implants,” in Aesthetic Surgery Journal, September/October.

    Google Scholar 

  6. ____ (2000), “The Comparative Dimensions of Round and Anatomical Saline-filled Breast Implants,” in Aesthetic Surgery Journal, July/August.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carter Hawley Hale Stores, Inc. v. Conley (1979), 372 So. 2d 965, 26 UCC Rep. Serv. 860 (Fla. App. 3 Dist.).

    Google Scholar 

  8. John A. Brown Co. v. Shelton (1963) 391 P. 2d 259 (Okl).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kraft vs. FTC (1992) 970 F.2d 311 (7th Cir). Metagenics (1996), unpublished initial decision available from Public Reference Branch, FTC.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mueller, B. (1992), “Implications for the Standardization vs. Specialization Debate: An Examination of Westernization in Japanese Advertising,” in Journal of Advertising Research, 32,1, 15–24.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Preston, I. (1987), “Extrinsic Evidence in Federal Trade Commission Deceptiveness Cases,” in Columbia Business Law Review, 3, 633–94.

    Google Scholar 

  12. ____ (1996), The Great American Blowup: Puffery in Advertising and Selling. University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Preston, I. and S. Scharbach (1971), “Advertising: More than Meets the Eye?” in Journal of Advertising Research, 11, 19–24

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rotfeld, H. and I. Preston (1981), “The Impact of Research on Advertising Law,” in Journal of Advertising Research, 21,2, 9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rotfeld, H. and K. Rotzoll (1980), “Is Advertising Puffery Believed?” in Journal of Advertising, 9,3, 16.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Russel, J. T. and W. R. Lane (2002), Kleppner’s Advertising Procedure, 15th edition, Pearson-Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 633.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zaichkoswky, J. (1986), “Conceptualizing Involvement,” in Journal of Advertising, 15, 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 3_96c.html Advertising Puffery: Current Status.

    Google Scholar 

  19. http://ftc.gov/guides/ad3subst.htm Federal Trade Commission (2003). Policy Statement Regarding Advertising Substantiation.

    Google Scholar 

  20. http://ftc.gov/bcp/policystmt/ad-decept.htm Federal Trade Commission Policy Statement on Deception.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Sandra Diehl Ralf Terlutter

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag ∣ GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mueller, B. (2006). The role of product involvement in advertising message perception and believability. In: Diehl, S., Terlutter, R. (eds) International Advertising and Communication. DUV. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-8350-5702-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics