Skip to main content

Local Bargaining and Employers' Co-operation Options

  • Conference paper
Collective Bargaining and Wage Formation
  • 423 Accesses

Abstract

Finnish employers want the locally bargained wage share to be approximately half of the total wage rise, which is significantly more than the locally bargained share in the current centralised wage agreement. However, employers' attitudes towards local bargaining vary a lot depending on firm characteristics. The aim of this paper is to explain employers' opinion of the proper locally bargained share of contract wages and also about who they think should decide on this wage share. It is shown that employers in large firms and in the financial services sector demand the largest locally bargained share of contract wages. When low competition in the product market is considered a challenge, employers may favour centralised wage setting instead of local bargaining. Employers are willing to involve employees in local bargaining decisions when the firm size is 30–299 employees or when the firm is profitable and operates in the service sector.

This is part of the research project Rules of the game in the labour market: Industrial relations, the bargaining system and income policies in the 2000s, financed by the Finnish Work Environment Fund, and carried out jointly by ETLA, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, and Labour Institute for Economic Research. We would like to thank Roope Uusitalo and Antti Kauhanen for very helpful comments, and seminar participants at the University of Jyväskylä for comments on an earlier draft. The usual disclaimer applies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alho, K. (1998): Tulospalkkaus — EMU-ajan palkkausmuoto. Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, Series B 146. Taloustieto Oy, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alho, K., Heikkilä, A., Lassila, J., Pekkarinen, J., Piekkola, H. and Sund, R. (2003): Suomalainen sopimusjärjestelmä — työmarkkinaosapuolten näkemykset. Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, Series B 203. Taloustieto Oy, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azfar, O. and Danninger, S. (2001): Profit-Sharing, Employment Stability, and Wage Growth. Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 54, 619–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centralised Income Policy Agreement for Years 2003–2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heikkilä, A. and Piekkola, H. (2004): Desire for Local Bargaining and Divergence of Opinions among Employers and Employees-Evidence from Finnish Survey. The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, Discussion papers. Forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauhanen, A. and Piekkola, H. (2002): Profit Sharing in Finland: Earnings and Productivity Effects. The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, Discussion papers no. 817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, D. L. (1996): Why Do Firms Adopt Profit-Sharing and Employee Ownership Plans? British Journal of Industrial Relations, 34, 515–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marjanen, R. (2002): Palkkaratkaisujen sisältö ja toteutuminen tulopolitiikan aikakaudella. Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, Series B 188. Taloustieto Oy, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekkarinen, J. and Alho, K. (2004): Finnish Bargaining System: Actors' Perceptions. In Piekkola, H. and Snellman, K. (eds.) Collective Bargaining and Wage Formation —Performance and Challenges. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piekkola, H. and Marjanen, R. (2003): Palkoista sopiminen ja palkkaliukuma: Tulopolitiikan uudet kulissit. Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, Series B 202. Taloustieto Oy, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vartiainen, J. (1998): The Labour Market in Finland: Institutions and Outcomes. Prime Minister's Office Publications Series 1998/2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2002): Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Heikkilä, A., Piekkola, H. (2005). Local Bargaining and Employers' Co-operation Options. In: Piekkola, H., Snellman, K. (eds) Collective Bargaining and Wage Formation. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7908-1598-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics