Skip to main content

Decommitment in a Competitive Multi-Agent Transportation Setting

  • Conference paper
Software Agent-Based Applications, Platforms and Development Kits

Abstract

Decommitment is the action of foregoing of a contract for another (superior) offer. It has been analytically shown that, using decommitment, agents can reach higher utility levels in case of negotiations with uncertainty about future opportunities. We study the decommitment concept for the novel setting of a large-scale logistics setting with multiple, competing companies. Orders for transportation of loads are acquired by agents of the (competing) companies by bidding in online auctions. We find significant increases in profit when the agents can decommit and postpone the transportation of a load to a more suitable time. Furthermore, we analyze the circumstances for which decommitment has a positive impact if agents are capable of handling multiple contracts simultaneously. Lastly, we present a demonstrator of the developed model in the form of a Java Applet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. Aknine, S. Pinson, and M. F. Shakun. An extended multi-agent negotiation protocol. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 8(1):5–45, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Andersson and T. Sandholm. Leveled commitment contracts with myopic and strategic agents. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 25:615–640, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. H.-J. Bürckert, K. Fischer, and G. Vierke. Teletruck: A holonic fleet management system. In Proceedings of the 14th European Meeting on Cybernetics and Systems Research, pages 695–700, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Byde, C. Preist, and N. R. Jennings. Decision procedures for multiple auctions. In Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems, pages 613–622, part 2. ACM press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Clearwater, editor. Market based Control of Distributed Systems. World Scientific Press, Singapore., 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Dellarocas. Goodwill hunting: An economically efficient online feedback mechanism in environments with variable product quality. In W. Walsh, editor, Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce at AAMAS 2002. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence from Springer-Verlag volume 2531, pages 238–252. Springer, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Epstein and R. Axtell. Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science From The Bottom Up. Brookings Institution, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. K. Fischer, J. P. Müller, and M. Pischel. Cooperative transportation scheduling, an application domain for DAI. Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence, special issue on intelligent agents, 10(1), 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  9. T. R. Fox M. S., Barbuceanu M. Agent-oriented supply-chain management. International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, 12:165–188, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. P. Klemperer. Auction theory: a guide to the literature. Journal of economic surveys, pages 227–286, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Klusch and A. Gerber. Casa: Agent-based integrated services network for timber production and sales. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 17(2), 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. Mui, A. Halberstadt, and M. Mojdeh. Notions of reputation in multi-agents systems: A review. In Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems. ACM press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Ossowski, A. Fernández, J. M. Serrano, J.-L. P. de-la Cruz, M.-V. Belmonte, J. Z. Hernández, A. Garcá-Serrano, and J.-M. Maseda. Designing multiagent decision support system-the case of transportation management. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), New York, pages 1470–1471, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. S. Otter, A. van der Veen, and H. J. de Vriend. ABLOoM: Location behaviour, spatial patterns, and agent-based modelling. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 4(4), 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  15. F. D. P. Keller and D. Precup. Redagent-2003: An autonomous supply-chain management agent. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), New York, pages 1182–1189, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. C. Parkes and L. H. Ungar. An auction-based method for decentralized train scheduling. In Proceedings 5th International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Agents’01), 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. Perugini, D. Lambert, L. Sterling, and A. R. Pearce. Agent-based global transportation scheduling in military logistics. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), New York, pages 1278–1279, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  18. P.J.’ t Hoen and La Poutré, J.A. A decommitment strategy in a competitive multiagent transportation setting. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce at AAMAS 2003, volume 3048 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 56–72. Springer, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Poot, G. Kant, and A. Wagelmans. A savings based method for real-life vehicle routing problems. Technical Report EI 9938/A, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Econometric Institute in its series Econometric Institute Reports, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  20. C. Preist, C. Bartolini, and I. Phillips. Algorithm design for agents which participate in multiple simultaneous auctions. In Proceedings of Agent Mediated E-Commerce, LNAI 2003, page 139 ff, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  21. T. Sandholm. An implementation of the contract net protocol based on marginal cost calculations. In Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Distributed Artificial Intelligence, pages 295–308, Hidden Valley, Pennsylvania, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  22. T. Sandholm. Limitations of the vickrey auction in computational multiagent systems. In 2nd International Conference on Multiagent Systems (ICMAS-96), pages 299–306. AAAI Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  23. T. Sandholm and V. Lesser. Issues in automated negotiation and electronic commerce: Extending the contract net framework. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multiagent Systems., pages 328–335, Menlo park, California, 1995. AAAI Press / MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. T. Sandholm and V. Lesser. Leveled-commitment contracting, a backtracking instrument for multiagent systems. AI Magazine, Fall 2002:89–100, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  25. T. Sandholm and V. R. Lesser. Leveled commitment contracts and strategic breach. Games and Economic Behavior, 35:212–270, 2001. Special issue on AI and Economics. Early version: Advantages of a Leveled Commitment Contracting Protocol in the proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pp. 126–133, Portland, OR, 1996.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. T. Sandholm, T. Suri, S. Gilpin, and A. Levine. CABOB: A fast optimal algorithm for combinatorial auctions. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  27. J. Sauer, T. Freese, and T. Teschke. Towards agent-based multi-site scheduling. In ECAI 2000 European Conference on Artificial Intelligence 14th Workshop, New Results in Planning, Scheduling and Design (PUK2000), 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  28. P. Stone, R. Schapire, J. Csirik, M. Littman, and D. McAllester. ATTac-2001: A learning, autonomous bidding agent. In W. Walsh, editor, Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce at AAMAS 2002. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence from Springer-Verlag volume 2531, pages 143–160. Springer, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  29. E. Tempelman. Daf-trucks-where materials make money. In Second Workshop on Cold and Hot Forging of Light-Weight Materials, Delft, from the ICFG (International Cold Forging Group), 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  30. I. J. Timm, editor. Proceedings of the Workshop on Agent Technologies in Logistics. ECAI, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  31. M. van Dyne. Negotiated Decommitment in a Collaborative Agent Environment. PhD thesis, University of Kansas, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  32. W. Vickrey. Counterspeculation, auctions and competitive sealed tenders. Journal of Finance, 16:8–37, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  33. D. Wolpert, K. Tumer, and J. Frank. Using collective intelligence to route internet traffic. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems-11, pages 952–958, Denver, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Birkhäuser Verlag

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hoen, P.J., Robu, V., La Poutré, H. (2005). Decommitment in a Competitive Multi-Agent Transportation Setting. In: Unland, R., Calisti, M., Klusch, M. (eds) Software Agent-Based Applications, Platforms and Development Kits. Whitestein Series in Software Agent Technologies. Birkhäuser Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7643-7348-2_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7643-7348-2_17

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser Basel

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7643-7347-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7643-7348-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics