Skip to main content

Integrating rules and cases for the classification task

  • Scientific Sessions
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development (ICCBR 1995)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1010))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The recent progress in Case- Based Reasoning has shown that one of the most important challenges in developing future AI methods will be to combine and synergistically utilize general and case-based knowledge. In this paper a very rudimentary kind of integration for the classification task, based on simple heuristics, is sketched: “To solve a problem, first try to use the conventional rule-based approach. If it does not work, try to remember a similar problem you have solved in the past and adapt the old solution to the new situation”. This heuristic approach is based on the knowledge base that consists of rule base and exception case base. The method of generating this kind of knowledge base from a set of examples is described. The proposed approach is tested, and compared with alternative approaches. The experimental results show that the presented integration method can lead to an improvement in accuracy and comprehensibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aamodt, A. (1991). A Knowledge-Intensive, Integrated Approach to Problem Solving and Sustained Learning. A Doctoral Dissertation-University of Trondheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aamodt, A. (1995). Knowledge Acquisition and Learning by Experience — The Role of Case-Specific Knowledge. In Kodratoff, Y., Tecuci, G. (eds.) On Integration of Knowledge Acquisition and Machine Learning. Academic Press (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aha, D.W. (1992). Tolerating noisy, irrelevant and novel attributes in instance-based learning algorithms. International Journal of Man Machine Studies, vol.36, pp.267–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armengol, E., Plaza, E. (1994). Integrating Induction in a Case-Based Reasoner. In Proceed. of the Second European Conference on Case-Based Reasoning. AcknoSoft Press, Paris, pp.243–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auriol, E., Manago, M., Althoff, K.D., Wess, S., Dittrich, S. (1994). Integration Induction and Case-Based Reasoning: Methodological Approach and First Evaluation. In Proceed. of the Second European Conference on Case-Based Reasoning. AcknoSoft Press, Paris, pp.145–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamberger, S.K., Goos, K. (1993). Integration of Case-Based Reasoning and Inductive Learning Methods. In Proceed. of the First European Conference on Case-Based Reasoning. SEKI Report SR-93-12. University of Keiserslautern, pp. 296–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biberman, Y. (1995). The Role of Prototypicality in Exemplar-Based Learning. In Machine Learning: ECML-95, (Eds.) Lavrac, N., Wrobel, S., Springer Verlag, pp.77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barletta, R. (1994). A Hybrid Indexing and Retrieval Strategy for Advisory Case-Based Reasoning Systems Built with ReMind. In Proceed. of the Second European Conference on Case-Based Reasoning. AcknoSoft Press, Paris, pp.49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardie, C. (1993). Using Decision Trees to Improve Case-Based Learning. In Proceed. of the Tenth International Conference on Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, pp.25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cost, S., Salzberg, S. (1993). A Weighted Nearest Neighbor Algorithm for Learning with Symbolic Features. Machine Learning vol.10, pp.57–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golding, A.R., Rosenbloom, P.S. (1991). Improving Rule-Based System through Case-Based Reasoning. In Proceed. of the 1991 National Conference on AI. The MIT Press, pp.22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, K.J. (1988). Explaining and Repairing Plans That Fails. Artificial Intelligence vol.45, pp.173–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohavi, R., John, G., Long, R., Manley, D., Pfleger, K. (1994). MLC++. A Machine Learning Library in C++. In Tools with Artificial Intelligence Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koton, P.A. (1988). Reasoning about Evidence in Causal Explanations. In Proceed. AAAI-88, Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, pp.256–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenz, M. (1993). Cabata — A hybrid Case-Based Reasoning system. In Proceed. of the First European Conference on Case-Based Reasoning. SEKI Report SR-93-12. University of Keiserslautem, pp. 204–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malek, M., Rialle, V. (1994). A Case-Based Reasoning System Applied to Neuropathy Diagnosis. In Proceed. of the Second European Conference on Case-Based Reasoning. AcknoSoft Press, Paris, pp.329–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manago, M., Althoff, K.D., Auriol, E., Traphoner, R., Wess, S., Conruyt, N., Maurer, F. (1993). Induction and Reasoning from Cases. In Proceed. of the first European Conference on Case-Based Reasoning. SEKI Report SR-93-12. University of Keiserslautern, pp. 204–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matwin, S., Plante, B. (1994). Theory Revision by Analyzing Explanations and Prototypes. In Michalski, R., Tecuci, G. (eds.) Machine Learning vol.4, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan, J.R. (1993). C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riesbéck, C.K., Schank, R.C. (1989). Inside Case-Based Reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rissland, E.L., Skalak D.B. (1991). CABARET: rule integration in a hybrid architecture. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, vol.34, pp.839–887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surma, J. (1994). Enhancing Similarity Measure with Domain Specific Knowledge”. In Proceed. of the Second European Conference on Case-Based Reasoning. AcknoSoft Press, Paris, pp.365–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utgoff, P.E. (1989). Incremental Decision Tress. Machine Learning, vol.4, pp.161–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. (1992). Selecting Typical Instances in Instance-Based Learning. In Proc. of the 9th Int. Conf. on Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, pp.470–479.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Manuela Veloso Agnar Aamodt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Surma, J., Vanhoof, K. (1995). Integrating rules and cases for the classification task. In: Veloso, M., Aamodt, A. (eds) Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development. ICCBR 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1010. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60598-3_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60598-3_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60598-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48446-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics