Skip to main content

A pragmatic representational approach of context and reference in discourses

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Conceptual Structures: Applications, Implementation and Theory (ICCS 1995)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 954))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Apart from general rules or laws, knowledge must be considered with respect to the agents that manipulate or communicate it. We introduced the notion of discourse space which refers to constructs which are created, updated or evoked by an agent who tries to generate or understand a discourse. Our approach which is based on a generalization of Sowa's conceptual graph theory is used to explain a variety of referential mechanisms such as indexicality, metonymy, referential opacity and transparency.

This research is supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (grant OGP 05518) and by FCAR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, J. F. (1995). Natural Language Understanding. Second Edition. Benjamin.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bar-Hillel, Y. (1954). Indexical Expressions. Mind, 63,359–379.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barwise, J. & Perry, J. (1983). Situations and Attitudes. The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bernth, A. (1989). Treatment of anaphoric problems in referentially opaque contexts. In Natural Language and Logic. Lecture Notes in A.I., n. 459. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dinsmore, J. (1987). Mental spaces from a functional perspective, Cognitive Science, vol 11, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Esch, J. (1993a). Contexts as white box concepts. In proceedings of the First International Conference on Conceptual Structures. Mineau, G. & Moulin, B. (Eds.). Quebec, Canada, August 1993.17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Esch, J. (1993b). The scope of coreference in conceptual graphs. In [24].

    Google Scholar 

  8. Esch, J. (1994a). Contexts and concepts: abstraction duals. In [27].

    Google Scholar 

  9. Esch, J. (1994b). Contexts, canons and coreferent types. In [27].

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fauconnier, G. (1985). Mental Spaces. Cambridge, Mass. The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Grosz, B. J. & Sidner, C. L. (1986). Attention, Intentions, and the Structure of Discourse. Computational Linguistics, Vol. 12, No 3,175–204.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hirschberg, J. & Litman, D. J. (1993). Empirical studies on the desambiguation of cue phrases. Computational Linguistics 19, 3, 501–530.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kamp, H. (1984). A theory of truth and semantic representation. In J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen & M. Stockhof (Eds.), Truth, Interpretation and Information. 277–322. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kuroda, S. Y. (1973). Where epistemology, style and grammar meet. In S. Anderson & P. Kiparsky (Eds.). A Festschrift for Morris Halle. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Langacker R. W. (1987), Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Stanford U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mineau, G. W., Moulin, B. & Sowa, J. F. (Eds.). Conceptual Graphs for Knowledge representation. Lecture Notes in A. I.699. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Moulin, B., Rousseau, D. & Vanderveken, D. (1992). Speech acts in a connected discourse: a computational representation based on conceptual graph theory. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 4,149–165.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Moulin, B. (1993a). Representing temporal knowledge in discourse: an approach extending the conceptual graph theory. In [24].

    Google Scholar 

  19. Moulin, B. (1993b). The representation of linguistic information in an approach used for modelling temporal knowledge in discourses. In [16].

    Google Scholar 

  20. Moulin, B. & Dumas, S. (1994).The temporal structure of a discourse and verb tense determination. In [27].

    Google Scholar 

  21. Moulin, B. (1995). Discourse spaces, a pragmatic interpretation of contexts. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Conceptual Structures ICCS'95, G. Ellis, R.A. Levinson, W. Rich, J. Sowa (Edts.), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nunberg, G. (1978). The Pragmatics of Reference. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Linguistics Club.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Palacas, A. L. (1993). Attribution semantics: linguistic worlds and point of view. Discourse Processes 16,239–277.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pfeiffer, H. & Nagle, T. (Eds.) (1993). Conceptual Graph: Theory and Implementation. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 754. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sowa, J. F. (1984). Conceptual Structures. Reading Mas: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sowa, J. F. (1993). Logical foundations for representing object-oriented systems. In Journ.of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial intelligence. Vol.5, n.2, 237–261.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tepfenhart, W. M., Dick, J. P., & Sowa, J. F. (Edts.) (1994). Conceptual Structures: Current Practices. Lecture Notes in A.I.835. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Gerard Ellis Robert Levinson William Rich John F. Sowa

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Moulin, B. (1995). A pragmatic representational approach of context and reference in discourses. In: Ellis, G., Levinson, R., Rich, W., Sowa, J.F. (eds) Conceptual Structures: Applications, Implementation and Theory. ICCS 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 954. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60161-9_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60161-9_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60161-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49539-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics