Skip to main content

Automating Space Allocation in Higher Education

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Simulated Evolution and Learning (SEAL 1998)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1585))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The allocation of office space in any large institution is usually a problematical issue, which often demands a substantial amount of time to perform manually. The result of this allocation affects the lives of whoever makes use of the space. In the higher education sector in the UK, space is becoming an increasingly precious commodity. Student numbers have risen significantly over the last few years and as a result, university departments have grown in size. In addition, universities have come under increasing financial pressure to ensure that space is utilized as efficiently and effectively as possible. However, space utilization is only one issue to take into account when measuring whether or not a particular allocation is of a sufficient high quality. The problem of space allocation is further complicated by the fact that no standard procedure is practiced throughout the higher education sector. Most institutions have their own standards and requirements, which are often very different to other institutions. Different levels of authority control the domains of rooms and resources in different institutions. The most common situation is where a central university office controls a number of faculties, each managing a number of departments. This paper will focus specifically on applying optimization methods to departmental room allocation for non-residential space in the higher education sector. It will look at the use of three methods (hill-climbing, simulated annealing and genetic algorithms) to automatically generate solutions to the problem. The processing power of computers and the repetitive search nature of this problem means that there is great potential for the automation of this process. The paper will conclude by discussing and comparing these methods and showing how they cope with a highly constrained problem.

The author’s names are listed in alphabetical order

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. I Giannikos, E El-Darzi and P Lees, An Integer Goal Programming Model to Allocate Offices to Staff in an Academic Institution in the Journal of the Operational Research Society Vol. 46No. 6. 713–720.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L Rizman, J Bradford and R Jacobs, A Multiple Objective Approach to Space Planning for Academic Facilities in the Journal of Management Science, Vol 25. 895–906.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C Benjamin, I Ehie and Y Omurtag, Planning Facilities at the University of Missouri-Rolia. Journal of Interfaces, Vol. 22No. 4. 95–105.

    Google Scholar 

  4. EK Burke and DB Varley. An Analysis of Space Allocation in British Universities, in Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling It, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1048, Springer-Verlag 1998. Pg 20–33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. KB Yoon. A Constraint Model of Space Planning. Topics in Engineering Vol. 9, Computation Mechanics Publications, Southampton, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  6. F Glover, C McMillan and B Novick, Interactive Decision Software and Computer Graphics for Architectural and Space Planning, Annals of Operations Research 5, Scientific Publishing Company, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E Rich and K Knight, Artificial Intelligence, international Second Edition, McGraw-Hill, Ine, 1991. Pg. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S Martello, P Toth. Knapsack Problems.. Algorithms and Computer Implementations. Wiley-Interscience Series in Discrete Mathematics and Optimization. Pg. 50–52

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Burke, E.K., Varley, D.B. (1999). Automating Space Allocation in Higher Education. In: McKay, B., Yao, X., Newton, C.S., Kim, JH., Furuhashi, T. (eds) Simulated Evolution and Learning. SEAL 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1585. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48873-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48873-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-65907-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48873-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics