Skip to main content

Strawson on Intended Meaning and Context

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Modeling and Using Context (CONTEXT 1999)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1688))

  • 564 Accesses

Abstract

Strawson proposed in the early seventies an attractive three-fold distinction regarding how context bears on the meaning of ‘what is said’ when a sentence is uttered. The proposed scheme is somewhat crude and, being aware of this aspect, Strawson himself raised various points to make it more adequate. In this paper, we review the scheme of Strawson, note his concerns, and add some of our own. However, our main point is to defend the essence of Strawson’s approach and to recommend it as a starting point for research into intended meaning and context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aitchison, J., The Language Web: The Power and Problem of Words (The 1996 BBC Reith Lectures), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Akman, V., “Ripping the text apart at different seams,” Stanford Humanities Review 4(1): 31–34 (1994). Special Supplement, Bridging the Gap (Where Cognitive Science Meets Literary Criticism), G. Güzeldere and S. Franchi, eds. [Available at http://shr.stanford.edu/shreview/4-1/text/akman.commentary.html]

    Google Scholar 

  3. Akman, V., “Journal of Pragmatics” (1999, to appear).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Austin, J. L., How to Do Things with Words (The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955), J. O. Urmson and M. Sbisá, eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press (1976). [Second edition]

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bach, K., “The semantics-pragmatics distinction: what it is and why it matters,” Linguistische Berichte: 33–50 (1997). Sonderheft 8/1997, Pragmatik: Implikaturen und Sprechakte, E. Rolf, ed. [Available at http://userwww.sfsu.edu/~kbach/semprag.html]

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chierchia, G. and S. McConnell-Ginet, Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Davidson, D., “Radical interpretation,” pp. 125–139 in Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, Oxford: Clarendon Press (1984). [Paper originally appeared in 1973]

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eco, U., The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts, Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grice, P., Studies in the Way of Words, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gumperz, J., “Contextualization and understanding,” pp. 229–252 in A. Duranti and C. Goodwin, eds., Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gumperz, J., “Culture and conversational inference,” pp. 193–214 in W. Foley, ed., The Role of Theory in Language Description, Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gumperz, J., “Communicative competence,” pp. 39–48 in N. Coupland and A. Jaworski, eds., Sociolinguistics: A Reader, New York: St. Martin’s Press (1997). [Abridged version of a paper which originally appeared in 1981]

    Google Scholar 

  13. Halliday, M. A. K., “Language in a social perspective,” pp. 48–71 in Explorations in the Functions of Language, London: Edward Arnold (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Halliday, M. A. K., Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Meaning, London: Edward Arnold (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Heritage, J., Garinkel and Ethnomethodology, Cambridge: Polity Press (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hymes, D., “Models of interaction of language and social life,” pp. 35–71 in J. Gumperz and D. Hymes, eds., Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, Oxford: Blackwell’s (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kent, T., “Language philosophy, writing, and reading: a conversation with Donald Davidson,” JAC: A Journal of Composition Theory 13(1) (1993). [Available at http://www.cas.usf.edu/JAC/131/kent.html]

  18. Leech, G., “Semantics: The Study of Meaning, Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin (1981). [Second edition]

    Google Scholar 

  19. Perry, J., “Indexicals and demonstratives,” pp. 586–612 in C. Wright and R. Hale, eds., A Companion to Philosophy of Language, Oxford: Blackwell’s (1997). [Available at http://www-csli.stanford.edu/~john/PHILPAPERS/shortind.pdf]

    Google Scholar 

  20. Perry, J., “Reflexivity, indexicality, and names,” pp. 3–19 in W. Kunne et al., eds., Direct Reference, Indexicality, and Propositional Attitudes, CSLI Lecture Notes No. 70, Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications (1997). [Available at http://www-csli.stanford.edu/∼john/PHILPAPERS/names.pdf]

    Google Scholar 

  21. Perry, J., “Indexicals, contexts, and unarticulated constituents,” in Proceedings of the 1995 CSLI-Amsterdam Logic, Language, and Computation Conference, Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications (1998). [Available at http://www-csli.stanford.edu/∼john/PHILPAPERS/context.pdf]

    Google Scholar 

  22. Récanati, F., “Contextualism and anti-contextualism in the philosophy of language,” pp. 156–166 in S. L. Tsohatzidis, ed., Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives, London: Routledge (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Récanati, F., “Processing models for non-literal discourse,” pp. 343–356 in R. Casati et al., eds., Philosophy and the Cognitive Sciences, Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Récanati, F., “Contextual domains,” pp. 25–36 in X. Arrazola et al., eds., Discourse, Interaction, and Communication, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Saville-Troike, M., The Ethnography of Communication: An Introduction, Oxford: Basil Blackwell (1989). [Second edition]

    Google Scholar 

  26. Strawson, P. F., “Austin and ‘locutionary meanin’,” pp. 191–215 in Entity and Identity (and Other Essays), Oxford: Clarendon Press (1997). [Paper originally appeared in 1973]

    Google Scholar 

  27. Strawson, P. F., “Meaning and context,” pp. 216–231 in Entity and Identity (and Other Essays), Oxford: Clarendon Press (1997). [A partial translation into French originally appeared in 1970]

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ziff, P., “What is said,” pp. 709–721 in D. Davidson and G. Harman, eds., Semantics of Natural Language, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel (1972).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Akman, V., Alpaslan, F.N. (1999). Strawson on Intended Meaning and Context. In: Bouquet, P., Benerecetti, M., Serafini, L., Brézillon, P., Castellani, F. (eds) Modeling and Using Context. CONTEXT 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1688. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48315-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48315-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66432-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48315-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics