Skip to main content

Change Blind Information Display for Ubiquitous Computing Environments

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
UbiComp 2002: Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2498))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Occupants of future computing environments with ubiquitous display devices may feel inundated with changing digital information. One solution is to create a reasoning module that accepts requests to display information from multiple applications and controls how the information is presented to minimize visual disruptions to users. Such a system might use information about what activity is occurring in the space to exploit a powerful phenomenon of the human visual system: change blindness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. G.D. Abowd and E.D. Mynatt. Charting past, present, and future research in ubiquitous computing. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(1):29–58, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. V. Aginsky and M.J. Tarr. How are different properties of a scene encoded in visual memory? Visual Cognition, 7(1/2/3):147–162, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Agostinelli, S.J. Sherman, R.H. Fazio, and E.S. Hearst. Detecting and identifying change: Additions versus deletions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12(4):445–454, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S.J. Blackmore, G. Brelstaff, K. Nelson, and T. Troscianko. Is the richness of our visual world an illusion? Transsaccadic memory for complex scenes. Perception, 24:1075–1081, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J.S. Brown and P. Duguid. Keeping it simple. In Terry Winograd, editor, Bringing Design to Software. Addison-Wesley Pub Co, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. Buxton. Integrating the periphery and context: A new taxonomy of telematics. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface, pages 239–246, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Grimes. On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. In K. Akins, editor, Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science, volume 2: Perception. Oxford University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.M. Heiner, S.E. Hudson, and K. Tanaka. The Information Percolator: Ambient information in a decorative object. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pages 141–148. ACM Press, November 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.M. Henderson. Transsaccadic memory and integration during real-world object perception. Psychonomic Science, 8:51–55, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. E. Horvitz, J. Breese, D. Heckerman, D. Hovel, and K. Rommelse. The Lumiere Project: Bayesian user modeling for inferring the goals and needs of software users. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 256–265, San Francisco, July 1998. Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Hotchberg. Representation of motion and space in video and cinematic displays. In K.R. Boff, L.K. Kaufman, and J.P. Thomas, editors, Handbook of perception and human performance, pages 22.1–22.64, London, 1986. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. Humphreys and P. Hanrahan. A distributed graphics system for large tiled displays. In Proceedings of IEEE Visualization’ 99, October 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  13. N. Jeremijenko. The dangling string. Artistic Exhibit.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Klein, A. Kingstone, and A. Pontefract. Orienting of visual attention. In K. Rayner, editor, Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading, pages 46–65, New York, 1992. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D.T. Levin and D.J. Simons. Perceiving stability in a changing world: Combining shots and integrating views in motion pictures and the real world. Media Psychology, 2:357–380, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. B. MacIntyre, E.D. Mynatt, S. Voida, K.M. Hansen, J. Tullio, and G.M. Corso. Support for multitasking and background awareness using interactive peripheral displays. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pages 41–50, New York, NY, 2001. ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. P.P. Maglio and C.S. Campbell. Tradeoffs in displaying peripheral information. In Proceedings of the CHI 2000 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 241–248, New York, NY, 2000. ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. C.C. Mann. Electronic paper turns the page. Technology Review, March 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  19. G. McConkie and D. Zola. Is visual information integrated across successive fixations in reading? Perception and Psychophysics, 25:221–224, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. S. Mondy and V. Coltheart. Detection and identification of change in naturalistic scenes. Visual Cognition, 7(1/2/3):281–296, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. D.A. Norman. The Design of Everyday Things. Doubleday, New York, NY, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J.K. O’Regan, R.A. Rensink, and J.J. Clark. Change-blindness as a result of “mudsplashes”. Nature, 398:34, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. C. Pinhanez. The Everywhere Displays Projector: A device to create ubiquitous graphical interfaces. In G.D. Abowd, B. Brumitt, and S.A.N. Shafer, editors, Proceedings of the Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, LNCS 2201, pages 315–331, Berlin Heidelberg, September 2001. Springer-Verlag.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. R.A. Rensink. The dynamic representation of scenes. Visual Cognition, 7(1/2/3):17–42, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. R.A. Rensink, J.K. O’Regan, and J.J. Clark. To see or not to see: the need for attention to preceived changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8:368–373, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. J.W. Rohrbaugh. The orienting reflex in humans. In Varieties of Attention, pages 323–373. Orlando Academic Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  27. D. Salber, A.K. Dey, and G.D. Abowd. The Context Toolkit: Aiding the development of context-enabled applications. In Proceeding of the CHI 99 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: the CHI is the Limit, pages 434–441, New York, NY, 1999. ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  28. K.L. Shapiro. Change blindness: theory or paradigm? Visual Cognition, 7(1/2/3):83–92, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. D.J. Simons. Current approaches to change blindness. Visual Cognition, 7(1/2/3):1–15, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. D.J. Simons and D.T. Levin. Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Science, 1(7):261–267, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. D.J. Simons, R.L. Reimer, and S.L. Franconeri. The role of abstract representations and motion signals in change detection. In Proceedings of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, April 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  32. W.S. Sun, R.S. Baker, J.S. Chuke, B.R. Rouholiman, S.A. Hansan, W. Gaza, M.W. Stava, and J.D. Porter. Age related changes in human blinks. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 38(1):92–99, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  33. B. Tversky and T. Sherman. Picture memory improves with longer on time and off time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 104:114–118, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  34. G. Wallis and H. Bülthoff. What’s scene and not seen: Influences of movement and task upon what we see. Visual Cognition, 7(1/2/3):175–190, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. M. Weiser and J. Brown. Designing calm technology. PowerGrid Journal, 1(1), 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Craig Wisneski, Hiroshi Ishii, Andrew Dahley, Matt Gorbet, Scott Brave, Brygg Ullmer, and Paul Yarin. Ambient displays: Turning architectural space into an interface between people and digital information. In N.A. Streitz, S. Konomi, and H-J. Burkhardt, editors, Proceedings of Cooperative Buildings, Integrating Information, Organization and Architecture, First International Workshop, CoBuild’98, LNCS 1370, pages 22–32. Springer, 1998.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Intille, S.S. (2002). Change Blind Information Display for Ubiquitous Computing Environments. In: Borriello, G., Holmquist, L.E. (eds) UbiComp 2002: Ubiquitous Computing. UbiComp 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2498. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45809-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45809-3_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44267-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45809-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics